|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Kakarot_ |
|
Post Content
|
Ask Dr Psychenheimer he has a grand scroll of my weekly visits but he'll charge $100 for a printout. NOTE: He did however extend Professor Darwin's 100 year search limit to find at least one transitional fossil trail to 200 years. This is highly applauded by his Church of Evolution and their faith in mutation makes it better no matter what is observed.  This is what darwin actually said: Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record. Charles Darwin (1859), The Origin of Species, p. 280. Quoting: Fossilization is extremely rare. It takes natural disasters for fossilization to occur, in general. Like volcanos or flooding or mudslides. They don't normally just fossilize when they die. So how is there supposed to be a "fossil trail"? If you think evolution needs fossil trails, where is the fossil trail of wolves to chihuahuas? That is not how evolution works. "better"? if you mean adaptation to their environments yes but there is no "absolute" better, it is only subjective. Fish are "better" than humans at living under water. There are even fish that can live in water or on land for 6 days. Mutations are not about making them absolute better. If a species change to a different environment they might die.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
