|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Sci-Fy Cult, how did the first embryo survive waiting a million years for mindless 'evolution' to design/construct/connect it's umbilic
|
|
Poster Handle
|
DGN |
|
Post Content
|
...
How can an embryo live without it? The same way they do today. Not all animals have umbilical cords.
How did it come about? I haven't done any research into this, but I'll tell you what I know.
The umbilical cord attaches an embryo to the placenta in mammals. Evidence suggests that mammals evolved from reptiles in the Triassic. The first mammals laid eggs, like modern montremes (platypus and echidnas). After this, Therian mammals appear, which no longer lay eggs. Then Therians diverge into two groups, marsupials (which have a yolk sac, rather than a placenta) and placental mammals.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481 Evidence suggests there are reptiles and mammals,they are specifically designed for their role in the biosphere and neither are now or ever in the past turned into each other, everwhat's your point? It's easy to just say things, but the difference is I can show you evidence for my position. You can't. Reptiles appear in the fossil record first. Then a series of increasingly mammal-like reptiles (synapsids), followed by true mammals. [ link to www2.palomar.edu (secure)] The genetic evidence, including ERVs, corroborate this sequence. My point is that according to Evolution theory, modern species -with umbilical cords- always had them. They weren't waiting around for the umbilical cord to evolve. In reality it is futile to talk to DGN about this. He is a cult member who believes evolution is from Satan. I was raised in that cult and laughed at evolutionists myself until college when I took biology courses and followed up with my own reading. As pointed out by Dawkins, creationist think life around them is too complex to have evolved without a designer. Yet uncritically they accept the existence of an all powerful all intelligent being that is far more complex than any life on earth. And that far more complex being exists without a designer itself according to their beliefs. Really? Lol Dawkin's scientifically illiterate pout is a misery loves company ploy by an unthankful tantruming hollow depressed soul expressing intellectual contempt for intelligence superior to his own. "For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way, 19 because what may be known about God is clearly evident among them, for God made it clear to them. 20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable. 21 For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God nor did they thank him, but they became empty-headed in their reasonings and their senseless hearts became darkened. 22 Although claiming they were wise, they became foolish 23 and turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and birds and four-footed creatures and reptiles." Ro1:18 "
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
