Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 795 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 71,756
Pageviews Today: 109,140Threads Today: 28Posts Today: 570
01:44 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

 
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 72690837
United States
08/02/2018 11:49 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools."

And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] )
 Quoting: ToSeek


Just the mere fact that you think the origin of life is settled science shows just how indoctrinated and blind you really are ....


Not a human being on earth knows the origin of life and there are competing theories and understanding of the BASICS OF LIFE ... BUT ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ...

Claiming to know is folly and shows how faulted human beings really are ...
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


The origin of life is a separate issue. Evolution only deals with what happened after life began.
 Quoting: ToSeek


Lol.... that's where the theory of evolution completely falls apart though so you guys totally discard that part ... great science there ... lol
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
HowlinMadMurphy

User ID: 75196460
United States
08/02/2018 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this?
 Quoting: Q33


putin-thiss
-Fig nuts
seadog 36

User ID: 76809044
United States
08/02/2018 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
The religion of evolution is losing members fast.

Praise God
 Quoting: Expose ALL Shills


where is the list of the 500 Scientists who Reject Darwin's Theory/
judahbenhuer

User ID: 75047855
United States
08/02/2018 11:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
I read in something called a 'book' that a long time ago, and far, far away these two guys named Francesco and Louis...
“My religious belief teaches me to feel as safe in battle as in bed. God has fixed the time for my death. I do not concern myself about that, but to be always ready, no matter when it may overtake me. That is the way all men should live, and then all would be equally brave.”
-Stonewall Jackson

"The Bible that is falling apart usually belongs to a person who is not." - Charles Spurgeon

“I apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe . . . Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing. Make them intelligent, and they will be vigilant; give them the means of detecting the wrong, and they will apply the remedy.”

“If we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go on prospering and to prosper; but if we and our posterity neglect its instructions and authority, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us and bury all our glory in profound obscurity.” -Daniel Webster
Photina

User ID: 12642910
Canada
08/03/2018 12:08 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Romans 1:25
They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.

Last Edited by Photina on 08/03/2018 01:30 AM
Many years you bore with them and warned them by your Spirit through your prophets. Yet they would not give ear. Therefore you gave them into the hand of the peoples of the lands. You gave your good Spirit to instruct them and did not withhold your manna from their mouth and gave them water for their thirst. Nevertheless, they were disobedient and rebelled against you and cast your law behind their back and killed your prophets, who had warned them in order to turn them back to you, and they committed great blasphemies.
Nehemiah 9:30,20,26, ESV
resicaF9+0E

User ID: 76782051
United States
08/03/2018 12:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this?
 Quoting: Q33


Or take a look at the amazing complexity of a millipede...how are we supposed to believe this evolved on its own? A millipede can have 100s of pairs of legs, even up to 750 pairs depending on the millipede! And have your ever watched how these legs move...like a wave along the sides of the millipede...to me seems like a robotic entity, with such timed, smooth motion. And we're supposed to believe we share a common single cell ancestry with that?

Micro evolution, the variation amongst species, is possible because the biological framework is already in place to allow such variations to take place - sort of like how microsoft allows different desktop backgrounds, or your cell phone allows you to make changes to the appearance of your user interface and applications. But, does that same process explain how a computer or cell phone came about? No, of course not. Computers and cell phones were created, because such extreme complexity could have never been achieved through gradual changes over time.

Likewise, the same for biological life. Macro evolution, the origin of new species or new organs or cell systems, cannot be explained the same way micro evolution can be explained.

The reason i know, without a doubt in my mind that we were created, is due to irreducible complexity, coined by Dr. M. Behe. Certain biochemical/biocellular systems could not ever have evolved, because all the necessary components, of which there could be hundreds of components, all had to be present from the very start of the system, or the system would crash. Behe points out the coagulation cascade, the biochemical system that prevents certain species from bleeding to death. All components had to be present from the start, or the animal/human would die. This completely destroys gradual mutations over time, because precursor systems of the coagulation cascade would fail, and hence the animal would not have ever survived (survival of the fittest, you know?).

And worse, the separate parts of these irreducibly complex systems themselves are produced by other irreducibly complex systems, and parts of those systems are produced by yet other irreducibly complex systems, and so forth...it is a massive web of complexity that could not ever have happened on its own...therefore, in my opinion, believing in evolution as the origin of the species is a much more enormous leap of faith than even believing in a creator God.

A great video to watch about irreducible complexity is this:

SoberLife

User ID: 15013876
United States
08/03/2018 12:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this?
 Quoting: Q33


this2
Asmodée

User ID: 76764840
United States
08/03/2018 01:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
It was very reassuring. At the time.
Crowley rhymes with "owl fleas"
(:-DeeZe  (OP)

User ID: 75458263
United States
08/03/2018 01:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this?
 Quoting: Q33


Or take a look at the amazing complexity of a millipede...how are we supposed to believe this evolved on its own? A millipede can have 100s of pairs of legs, even up to 750 pairs depending on the millipede! And have your ever watched how these legs move...like a wave along the sides of the millipede...to me seems like a robotic entity, with such timed, smooth motion. And we're supposed to believe we share a common single cell ancestry with that?

Micro evolution, the variation amongst species, is possible because the biological framework is already in place to allow such variations to take place - sort of like how microsoft allows different desktop backgrounds, or your cell phone allows you to make changes to the appearance of your user interface and applications. But, does that same process explain how a computer or cell phone came about? No, of course not. Computers and cell phones were created, because such extreme complexity could have never been achieved through gradual changes over time.

Likewise, the same for biological life. Macro evolution, the origin of new species or new organs or cell systems, cannot be explained the same way micro evolution can be explained.

The reason i know, without a doubt in my mind that we were created, is due to irreducible complexity, coined by Dr. M. Behe. Certain biochemical/biocellular systems could not ever have evolved, because all the necessary components, of which there could be hundreds of components, all had to be present from the very start of the system, or the system would crash. Behe points out the coagulation cascade, the biochemical system that prevents certain species from bleeding to death. All components had to be present from the start, or the animal/human would die. This completely destroys gradual mutations over time, because precursor systems of the coagulation cascade would fail, and hence the animal would not have ever survived (survival of the fittest, you know?).

And worse, the separate parts of these irreducibly complex systems themselves are produced by other irreducibly complex systems, and parts of those systems are produced by yet other irreducibly complex systems, and so forth...it is a massive web of complexity that could not ever have happened on its own...therefore, in my opinion, believing in evolution as the origin of the species is a much more enormous leap of faith than even believing in a creator God.

A great video to watch about irreducible complexity is this:


 Quoting: resicaF9+0E


bump
(:-DeeZe

"The love that you withhold is the pain that you carry"

“To live content with small means; to seek elegance rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion, to be worthy, not respectable, and wealthy, not rich; to study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act frankly, to listen to stars and birds, to babes and sages, with open heart, to bear all cheerfully, to all bravely await occasions, hurry never. In a word, to let the spiritual unbidden and unconscious grow up through the common. This is to be my symphony.”
.........William Henry Channing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74482595
Canada
08/03/2018 01:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
cmon people


it is not evolution

or creation

it is BOTH
(:-DeeZe  (OP)

User ID: 75458263
United States
08/03/2018 01:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
cmon people


it is not evolution

or creation

it is BOTH
 Quoting: infinitymindbox


I totally agree with that.

Thanks!
(:-DeeZe

"The love that you withhold is the pain that you carry"

“To live content with small means; to seek elegance rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion, to be worthy, not respectable, and wealthy, not rich; to study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act frankly, to listen to stars and birds, to babes and sages, with open heart, to bear all cheerfully, to all bravely await occasions, hurry never. In a word, to let the spiritual unbidden and unconscious grow up through the common. This is to be my symphony.”
.........William Henry Channing
Bagel_Dog

User ID: 72878112
United States
08/03/2018 01:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV
[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
Stand your ground, find the strength within and battle on.
Starburne

User ID: 76804005
South Africa
08/03/2018 01:23 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
And my largest frustration in any debate is how the subject matter gets framed.

Darwin's book was titled "The Origin Of Species." He postulated that evolution within a species somehow leads to THE CREATION OF NEW SPECIES. Over time we have all accepted that EVOLUTION is real. AND IT IS! Humans in sunny, hot environments are very different from humans in cold, sun-starved environments.

Evolution within species is undeniable; however, evolution as a means of explaining origins of new species is ludicrous.
 Quoting: Harry The Dog


Evolution is God's game tounge
Photina

User ID: 57941573
Canada
08/03/2018 01:26 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Erasmus Darwin. 33rd degree freemason.
Many years you bore with them and warned them by your Spirit through your prophets. Yet they would not give ear. Therefore you gave them into the hand of the peoples of the lands. You gave your good Spirit to instruct them and did not withhold your manna from their mouth and gave them water for their thirst. Nevertheless, they were disobedient and rebelled against you and cast your law behind their back and killed your prophets, who had warned them in order to turn them back to you, and they committed great blasphemies.
Nehemiah 9:30,20,26, ESV
hankie

User ID: 75555467
United States
08/03/2018 01:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
From another science, they have only found mankind and animal kind and other things that we know about, in a big gap between the first created marine life and it dying and a short time in the scheme of thing, we popped into being, nothing seen before hand. I am sure the different sciences talk to each other about these oddities, not so odd if you read about it somewhere else.

See it was the Water before the land.
Sorry I got a headache

These are the times that tries men's and
women's souls!

May we come though it victorious!
SmoothSailing

User ID: 71448021
United States
08/03/2018 01:30 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Evolution is only a theory not a fact. Climate change is a stupid term for natural atmospheric patterns.
 Quoting: FlashBuzzkill


bump
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."
Marcus Tullius Cicero
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74482595
Canada
08/03/2018 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
when the annunaki came here
earth had all ready evolved life up to early hominids

that is when they intervened
Osmium76
Intrepid searcher.

User ID: 76791292
United States
08/03/2018 01:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


Fuck darwin fuck everything nothing not even the bible explains what the fuck we are or anything i seen a small fly the other day it was so fucking small there is no way in HELL that shit just made it self out of nothing its so deep and complicated i dunno what the hell to believe what the hell is the sun what is space what the hell is water why are we even here what is this?
 Quoting: Q33


Please remain seated and keep your hands in the cart at all times.

When the ride is over, please exit the cart on one or the other side and follow one of the two paths that the attendant indicates is proper for you.

Enjoy the ride an remember to be respectful to your fellow passengers along the way. Thank you!

Chasing the dream....realizing the Revelation.

"AS FOR ME AND MY HOUSE....WE WILL SERVE THE LORD!" [link to www.sabbathtruth.com]

ECCLESIASTES 12:13 LET US HEAR THE CONCLUSION OF THE WHOLE MATTER: FEAR GOD, AND KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS: FOR THIS IS THE WHOLE DUTY OF MAN.(KJV)

The Rime of the Ancient Mariner.
"It is an ancient Mariner,
And he stoppeth one of three.
'By thy long grey beard and glittering eye,
Now wherefore stopp'st thou me?"
SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE

Don't be an agent of Satan, instead wouldn't you rather be a scribe of Truth?!

If it seems like I edit everything I post, it's because I am constantly revising my understanding of the world around me. I find it difficult to resist my compulsion for accuracy and truth.
plzxplain

User ID: 76795396
Australia
08/03/2018 01:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
...


Yes, they were able to get 500 scientists - most of them obscure - to sign this mealy-mouthed proclamation: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

Meanwhile, the National Center for Science Education asked scientists to sign up to this statement: "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools."

And to make things a little harder on themselves, they only asked scientists named "Steve." They're up to 1427 signatures and counting. ( [link to ncse.com (secure)] )
 Quoting: ToSeek


Just the mere fact that you think the origin of life is settled science shows just how indoctrinated and blind you really are ....


Not a human being on earth knows the origin of life and there are competing theories and understanding of the BASICS OF LIFE ... BUT ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ...

Claiming to know is folly and shows how faulted human beings really are ...
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


The origin of life is a separate issue. Evolution only deals with what happened after life began.
 Quoting: ToSeek


Lol.... that's where the theory of evolution completely falls apart though so you guys totally discard that part ... great science there ... lol
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


Re-read what he said above, which is correct.

You, are totally disregarding that part.
The part that, after life, species inbred, and interbred with other species, of which is 'evolving'.
(even some 'human' type species)

A simple example, many people won't 'breed' with someone whom they perceive to be of lower intelligence, as they believe that to be 'de-volving.

Millions of species have 'evolved' in various ways. Just one example, developing immunity towards things that have killed them in past.
Urban Mythbuster

User ID: 76711413
United Kingdom
08/03/2018 01:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Evolution is a lie
The chariots of God are tens of thousands, and thousands of thousands.
C. K. Dexter Haven

User ID: 76620454
Sweden
08/03/2018 01:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
It's all Hydrogen
The Patriot Mind

User ID: 73507507
United States
08/03/2018 02:05 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
...


Just the mere fact that you think the origin of life is settled science shows just how indoctrinated and blind you really are ....


Not a human being on earth knows the origin of life and there are competing theories and understanding of the BASICS OF LIFE ... BUT ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ...

Claiming to know is folly and shows how faulted human beings really are ...
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


The origin of life is a separate issue. Evolution only deals with what happened after life began.
 Quoting: ToSeek


Lol.... that's where the theory of evolution completely falls apart though so you guys totally discard that part ... great science there ... lol
 Quoting: The Patriot Mind


Re-read what he said above, which is correct.

You, are totally disregarding that part.
The part that, after life, species inbred, and interbred with other species, of which is 'evolving'.
(even some 'human' type species)

A simple example, many people won't 'breed' with someone whom they perceive to be of lower intelligence, as they believe that to be 'de-volving.

Millions of species have 'evolved' in various ways. Just one example, developing immunity towards things that have killed them in past.
 Quoting: plzxplain


You are conflating adaptation and evolution
Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014

Signed,

The Patriot Mind
BYM

User ID: 71689189
United States
08/03/2018 02:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Evolution is driven by adaptation...
Expose ALL Shills

User ID: 75409848
United States
08/03/2018 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Evolution is a lie
 Quoting: Urban Mythbuster


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74636699
Netherlands
08/03/2018 02:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Evolution is more philosophy than science
C. K. Dexter Haven

User ID: 76620454
Sweden
08/03/2018 02:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
There is no "missing link".

Wherever life sprang from, it sprang in a cornucopia of different forms and flavors.
Muscles

User ID: 76809254
United States
08/03/2018 02:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
And my largest frustration in any debate is how the subject matter gets framed.

Darwin's book was titled "The Origin Of Species." He postulated that evolution within a species somehow leads to THE CREATION OF NEW SPECIES. Over time we have all accepted that EVOLUTION is real. AND IT IS! Humans in sunny, hot environments are very different from humans in cold, sun-starved environments.

Evolution within species is undeniable; however, evolution as a means of explaining origins of new species is ludicrous.
 Quoting: Harry The Dog


Evolution within species is not called Evolution it's called adaptation meaning that the human being is still a human and always will be a human it doesn't change into another species. Instead it is written in the Human genome to have the abiñity to adapt to different environmemtal conditions as a means of protección. if I were to go to a hotter climate in Africa my skin would darken but I would still be a human and a part of the human family the DNA is a code whatever it says you are you are.
Muscles
mushufasa11

User ID: 76590430
Canada
08/03/2018 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Even if Darwinian evolution is indeed the general framework that more or less drives life/speciation, there will be intricacies that we humans cannot comprehend. Human's are not very good at context. The idea of change occurring over thousands or millions of years is very difficult to conceive. Nature is vast with many secrets and we have already been caught time and time again as being negligent to how interconnected all species are. Our sciences ultimately form man-made conclusions that are not "fact" or "truth" but rather speculative opinion.

That is to say it is as equally speculative as any other "theory" that man can conclude.

Can you live without having a belief in the matter? Should we not try to live in harmony with nature no matter what the theory?
Expose ALL Shills

User ID: 75409848
United States
08/03/2018 02:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Even if Darwinian evolution is indeed the general framework that more or less drives life/speciation, there will be intricacies that we humans cannot comprehend. Human's are not very good at context. The idea of change occurring over thousands or millions of years is very difficult to conceive. Nature is vast with many secrets and we have already been caught time and time again as being negligent to how interconnected all species are. Our sciences ultimately form man-made conclusions that are not "fact" or "truth" but rather speculative opinion.

That is to say it is as equally speculative as any other "theory" that man can conclude.

Can you live without having a belief in the matter? Should we not try to live in harmony with nature no matter what the theory?
 Quoting: mushufasa11


We have laws of science, such as the laws of thermodynamics, biogenesis, etc

Evolution violates these laws

If you keep studying you will see that the universe is incredibly fine-tuned, and it could not have happened by random chance.
Pilgrim001

User ID: 75732347
United States
08/03/2018 02:45 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of EvIl ution

snip....

"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."

[link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)]
 Quoting: (:-DeeZe


FIFY
Funny how 'social security' has a shortfall...but never WELFARE!
Gimme a break.
Somehow, we can always afford ALL types of welfare (even for millions of illegal immigrants!), plus billions in foreign aid to nations that hate us...BUT...social security is a "problem".

Nah, the problem is the goobermint...Unknown AC.


Blame it on my ADD, baby...Sail


The election of Donald Trump didn't cause the hatred displayed by the progressive liberal left and democratic party. The election of Donald Trump exposed it.
Donald Isaacson

Don't forget to have your Liberals spayed or neutered....Stolen