500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

Lol.... that's where the theory of evolution completely falls apart though so you guys totally discard that part ... great science there ... lol

where is the list of the 500 Scientists who Reject Darwin's Theory/

I read in something called a 'book' that a long time ago, and far, far away these two guys named Francesco and Louis...

Romans 1:25
They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.

Last Edited by Photina on 08/03/2018 01:30 AM

Or take a look at the amazing complexity of a millipede...how are we supposed to believe this evolved on its own? A millipede can have 100s of pairs of legs, even up to 750 pairs depending on the millipede! And have your ever watched how these legs move...like a wave along the sides of the millipede...to me seems like a robotic entity, with such timed, smooth motion. And we're supposed to believe we share a common single cell ancestry with that?

Micro evolution, the variation amongst species, is possible because the biological framework is already in place to allow such variations to take place - sort of like how microsoft allows different desktop backgrounds, or your cell phone allows you to make changes to the appearance of your user interface and applications. But, does that same process explain how a computer or cell phone came about? No, of course not. Computers and cell phones were created, because such extreme complexity could have never been achieved through gradual changes over time.

Likewise, the same for biological life. Macro evolution, the origin of new species or new organs or cell systems, cannot be explained the same way micro evolution can be explained.

The reason i know, without a doubt in my mind that we were created, is due to irreducible complexity, coined by Dr. M. Behe. Certain biochemical/biocellular systems could not ever have evolved, because all the necessary components, of which there could be hundreds of components, all had to be present from the very start of the system, or the system would crash. Behe points out the coagulation cascade, the biochemical system that prevents certain species from bleeding to death. All components had to be present from the start, or the animal/human would die. This completely destroys gradual mutations over time, because precursor systems of the coagulation cascade would fail, and hence the animal would not have ever survived (survival of the fittest, you know?).

And worse, the separate parts of these irreducibly complex systems themselves are produced by other irreducibly complex systems, and parts of those systems are produced by yet other irreducibly complex systems, and so forth...it is a massive web of complexity that could not ever have happened on its own...therefore, in my opinion, believing in evolution as the origin of the species is a much more enormous leap of faith than even believing in a creator God.

A great video to watch about irreducible complexity is this:

It was very reassuring. At the time.

cmon people


it is not evolution

or creation

it is BOTH

I totally agree with that.

Thanks!

1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV
[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Evolution is God's game

Erasmus Darwin. 33rd degree freemason.

From another science, they have only found mankind and animal kind and other things that we know about, in a big gap between the first created marine life and it dying and a short time in the scheme of thing, we popped into being, nothing seen before hand. I am sure the different sciences talk to each other about these oddities, not so odd if you read about it somewhere else.

See it was the Water before the land.

when the annunaki came here
earth had all ready evolved life up to early hominids

that is when they intervened

Re-read what he said above, which is correct.

You, are totally disregarding that part.
The part that, after life, species inbred, and interbred with other species, of which is 'evolving'.
(even some 'human' type species)

A simple example, many people won't 'breed' with someone whom they perceive to be of lower intelligence, as they believe that to be 'de-volving.

Millions of species have 'evolved' in various ways. Just one example, developing immunity towards things that have killed them in past.

Evolution is a lie

It's all Hydrogen

You are conflating adaptation and evolution

Evolution is driven by adaptation...

Evolution is more philosophy than science

There is no "missing link".

Wherever life sprang from, it sprang in a cornucopia of different forms and flavors.

Evolution within species is not called Evolution it's called adaptation meaning that the human being is still a human and always will be a human it doesn't change into another species. Instead it is written in the Human genome to have the abiñity to adapt to different environmemtal conditions as a means of protección. if I were to go to a hotter climate in Africa my skin would darken but I would still be a human and a part of the human family the DNA is a code whatever it says you are you are.

Even if Darwinian evolution is indeed the general framework that more or less drives life/speciation, there will be intricacies that we humans cannot comprehend. Human's are not very good at context. The idea of change occurring over thousands or millions of years is very difficult to conceive. Nature is vast with many secrets and we have already been caught time and time again as being negligent to how interconnected all species are. Our sciences ultimately form man-made conclusions that are not "fact" or "truth" but rather speculative opinion.

That is to say it is as equally speculative as any other "theory" that man can conclude.

Can you live without having a belief in the matter? Should we not try to live in harmony with nature no matter what the theory?

We have laws of science, such as the laws of thermodynamics, biogenesis, etc

Evolution violates these laws

If you keep studying you will see that the universe is incredibly fine-tuned, and it could not have happened by random chance.

FIFY