500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

Any subset within the human body is amazing. The Eye, alone, is an engineering marvel. When an eye is joined by another in Stereo vision, Depth percept results and a clearer picture. Evil lutionist would have you believe it all started with a light sensitive mole on the skin. LOL

The Human body is an amazing thing. It's not perfect, but damn it's good. Whether we have a soul or not, is up to you, but it's undeniable that we are a an engineering marvel. We are self-replicating machines. That we might adapt to certain things isn't an indication of evil ution, but testimony to the greatness and adaptability of the original model.

There For GOD/Creator because I don't know.

A good example of what, in aggregate , is 'Trickle Down' Disclosure .

As we can see here in this thread , the likely truth is far too much for certain groups of people to handle in a balanced way .
For many, change is something very difficult and painful to accommodate and the type of person who fits , for example , the Fundamentalist or 'Bible Literal 'name tags clearly struggle , as their whole world view is threatened .
Rightly or wrongly it has been decided that rather than risk hysteria and violence on a widespread scale , it is better to reveal matters step by step and little by little.
Very understandable unless you are highly impatient and also sufficiently balanced and flexible to absorb fundamental changes in outlook and a revision of history in many areas .

You would 'adapt'
Adaptation refers to the process wherein certain groups or individuals change their ways in order to be better suited to their environment and habitat. This is change is needed so that they can survive and maintain normal functioning in their community. For example, during winters or cold days, individuals learn to alter their homes and personal clothes to be able to live through the chilling temperatures.

Read more: Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution | Difference Between [link to www.differencebetween.net]


Over a very long period of time, your bloodline would 'evolve' :

Evolution, though, takes a long time. It is a process in which the genetic structure and physical anatomy change in relation to the changes happening in the environment. It does not occur overnight, but invokes generations in order to turn out into the best being suitable. Human beings are indeed an example, as evidenced from our ancestors the Homo erectus, to Homo sapiens, or basically, us. We are the proof of evolution.


Hers another example, your nose lol it will eventually change genetically, become broader

[link to www.smithsonianmag.com (secure)]

These laws have held up and served our needs pretty well since being implemented in civilization. I would question whether these are universally built-in laws that were "discovered." Perhaps the universe does tend to behave this way for the most part, but there is probably more to the story.

I never said anything happened by random chance.

The dichotomy between random chance and creation is an example of taking data and arriving at an inevitably short-minded conclusion.

Well said, and that is why most 'truths' will not be revealed.
(and why people get red karma, lol for even daring to consider, that some 'book/s', may be www . rr . o . n . g . .

Everything is, Our current line of life is quiet extensive,

OK I give so we are God's cosmic petri dish of DNA/RNA, amino acid, cells, etc so great I am nothing but his cosmic experiment! If that is so is that any worse than being the latest in evolution? You all are just scared, have answers based only in faith yet we are here and now so one of us is right! 60+ years on this planet I have seen zero evidence
of any God! I don't need to explain things seems I have no choice but witness it and live life best I can! I'll figure it out when I get there!

Peace

I believe you've hit the nail on the head. We know nothing and there is no way to really know anything. The answers in the Bible really aren't satisfactory and it is "channeled" information, so what is left? Nothing.
To me, it's really plain that we are a created mechanism, but, beyond that, ??? Who are we? What are we? Where are we? Who made us?

Laugh, Scoff, Do what you will, but I've never read a better explanation of it all than from reading the Nurse's story in Alien Interview.

[link to exopoliticshongkong.com]


You say that it's impossible that "the alien" could telepathically send it's thoughts to the nurse? Well, that's how we got the Bible.

Last Edited by Bennder on 08/03/2018 10:02 AM

I can agree with all of this, but it does nothing to prove that evolution is the causative mechanism for the origin of new species.

Give me ONE renowned scientist who rejects Evolution, and who isn't also a Bible tard, then I'll listen.

The theory of evolution only comes into play once organisms start reproducing. It's irrelevant before then. It would be like saying a professional race car driver is incompetent because he can't build his own car - his expertise only comes into play once the car is built and ready to drive.

Here (PDF download): [link to www.discovery.org]

If you see the names of any scientists sufficiently "renowned" that you recognize them, please let me know.

How many of the 1400 would anyone consider as "renowned"?



It would also be interesting to see how many of these 1400 are "devout atheists".

How many of them are afraid to sign the other list based on previous attempts by "devout Darwinists" to blacklist anyone who disagrees with the Darwin "theory"?

Darwinsim is a religion unto itself.

No one claimed that the "Project Steve" list was composed of renowned scientists, unlike the OP and the list of 500. But there are some, anyway:

Stephen Hawking (Steve #300)
Steven Weinberg (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1979)
Steven Chu (Nobel Prize in Physics, 1997)

Pointless thread as Endogenous Retroviruses have already proven evolution 100%.

here is a one page speech that Hawking gave that
addresses what you say.

[link to www.hawking.org.uk]

They are called laws for a reason, not because they serve human needs.

We should be teaching Biogenesis in the schools as fact, not abiogenesis.

Evolution is a tax-funded religion and nothing more.

Did the ERV spontaneously arise from mud and rocks?

You are back where you started, with nothing.

Totally disagree

ERVs are indirect evidence of evolution, common descent. Retroviruses make a DNA copy of their RNA genome and then insert it into a random position in the host out of 3 billion positions, if its in a germline cell the host's offspring will have the ERV instead and if this offspring reproduces, its offspring will also have the ERV in the exact same position, this will keep repeating over and over every generation, which is why humans and chimps share 99.9% of their ERV insertions in the exact same position with the exact same mutations. It is literally impossible for evolution to not exist due to this. (99.9% is 203,000 ERV insertions shared between humans and chimps)

Last Edited by Kakarot_ on 08/04/2018 08:57 AM

The ERV still has genetic material, right?

I believe you are confusing amino acids with nucleic acids. They are not the same.

Wow, 500 scientists? lol

I can give you a list of 500 scientists named Peter who accept evolution.

Do it, provide some names and you will see them backtracking away from some of the things which are still taught as fact in the public schools.

The most common excuse is 'evolution only deals with what happened after life appeared' or some form of that.

the 4 basic Amino Acids are basic for all DNA

ERVs contain the retrovirus genes GAG POL ENV. As well as the Long Terminal Repeats, LTRs, which are formed during reverse transcription, the process retroviruses use to make a DNA copy of their RNA genome. The LTRs are both sides of the ERVs, just like they see today when todays retroviruses do the same thing.

The 2 LTRs in each ERV have to be completely, 100% identical at the time of insertion. So when they look at the LTRs in each ERV, they are able to see the how old the ERVs are compared to the other ERVs. The more divergence of the mutations between the 2 LTRs in each ERV shows how old they are compared to the other pairs of LTRs in the other ERVs.

The more divergence of the LTRs, the older they are, the more mutation difference between each LTR in each ERV. When they look at the same LTRs in multiple species, it shows how closely related the species are. Since the LTRs are more identical in chimps with humans, than with gorillas and humans, they know chimps and humans are more closely related than with gorillas and humans. And that gorillas and humans are more closely related than with old world monkeys and humans. It shows chimps and humans share a common ancestor more recently than with gorillas and humans.

This proves evolution as it is impossible for humans and chimps to share ERVs without evolution, as ERVs are retrovirus insertions and that they KNOW they are retrovirus insertions due to the LTRs which are formed during reverse transcription, the process retroviruses use to make a DNA copy of their RNA genome. And that, they contain retrovirus genes..

This is the old tired argument of common design vs common descent.

Once you are able to show that genetic material can arise magically from a few non-chiral amino acids, then come back and say evolution is possible. Until then you still have nothing.

This is not common design, these are retrovirus insertions. They KNOW they are insertions, not from an original design. They see the exact same thing still happening today in person. LTRs form during reverse transcription. All the ERVs have LTRs both sides of the ERVs. They see the same thing happening today with todays retroviruses. It is literally the best single evidence of evolution. Humans and chimps share 99.9% (203,000 insertions) of their ERVs in the exact same position with the exact same mutations, you have to be mentally retarded to reject it. Retroviruses insert into 1 of 3 billion places, this ERV will stay in that same position generation after generation and that is what we see in all the apes. It is impossible for there to be no evolution/common descent.

Its wistful thinking.