|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Expose ALL Shills |
|
Post Content
|
...
Did the ERV spontaneously arise from mud and rocks?
You are back where you started, with nothing.
Quoting: Expose ALL Shills ERVs are indirect evidence of evolution, common descent. Retroviruses make a DNA copy of their RNA genome and then insert it into a random position in the host out of 3 billion positions, if its in a germline cell the host's offspring will have the ERV instead and if this offspring reproduces, its offspring will also have the ERV in the exact same position, this will keep repeating over and over every generation, which is why humans and chimps share 99.9% of their ERV insertions in the exact same position with the exact same mutations. It is literally impossible for evolution to not exist due to this. (99.9% is 203,000 ERV insertions shared between humans and chimps) The ERV still has genetic material, right? I believe you are confusing amino acids with nucleic acids. They are not the same. ERVs contain the retrovirus genes GAG POL ENV. As well as the Long Terminal Repeats, LTRs, which are formed during reverse transcription, the process retroviruses use to make a DNA copy of their RNA genome. The LTRs are both sides of the ERVs, just like they see today when todays retroviruses do the same thing. The 2 LTRs in each ERV have to be completely, 100% identical at the time of insertion. So when they look at the LTRs in each ERV, they are able to see the how old the ERVs are compared to the other ERVs. The more divergence of the mutations between the 2 LTRs in each ERV shows how old they are compared to the other pairs of LTRs in the other ERVs. The more divergence of the LTRs, the older they are, the more mutation difference between each LTR in each ERV. When they look at the same LTRs in multiple species, it shows how closely related the species are. Since the LTRs are more identical in chimps with humans, than with gorillas and humans, they know chimps and humans are more closely related than with gorillas and humans. And that gorillas and humans are more closely related than with old world monkeys and humans. It shows chimps and humans share a common ancestor more recently than with gorillas and humans. This proves evolution as it is impossible for humans and chimps to share ERVs without evolution, as ERVs are retrovirus insertions and that they KNOW they are retrovirus insertions due to the LTRs which are formed during reverse transcription, the process retroviruses use to make a DNA copy of their RNA genome. And that, they contain retrovirus genes.. This is the old tired argument of common design vs common descent. Once you are able to show that genetic material can arise magically from a few non-chiral amino acids, then come back and say evolution is possible. Until then you still have nothing.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
