| Users Online Now: 1,291 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 253,315 | |
| Pageviews Today: 338,683 | Threads Today: 99 | Posts Today: 1,511 |
| 02:52 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,291 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 253,315 | |
| Pageviews Today: 338,683 | Threads Today: 99 | Posts Today: 1,511 |
| 02:52 AM | ||
Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. | |
| NikM755 Offer Upgrade  User ID: 76887486  United States08/30/2018 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| El Pato User ID: 74481879 United States08/30/2018 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Dinosaurs “created” by Fallen angel DNA manipulation. He changes God’s creations. Lift up the transgender. Worship them like they are special. Put that ugly ass Caitlyn on the cover. El Pato |
| NikM755 (OP) User ID: 71632887 United States08/30/2018 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. 1. Up until 2014, scientist believed that earths water came from comets and asteroids. This theory was debunked when enough water was found within the earths crust to fill the oceans 4x over in ringwoodite. Quoting: NikM755 The Old Testament written over 3300 years ago States exactly that God sealed the water underneath the depths after the flood. How many of you remember Athiest claiming where did all the water come from? 2. Blood and Tissue exist in fossils records including the T-rex. These should not be possible if young earth creationist are wrong. They would both be destroyed over hundreds of millions of years (evolutionary theory). 3. There is still not a single transitional fossil in existence. Only two years ago, did evolutionist start claiming one existed. Except, they lied. They don't. The fossils they claim are transitional, are actually unique, but are not transitional. 4. Obviously, creation (the big bang), God created man from the dust (abiogenis), are all theories that were taken and corrupted from the Bible to support evolution. The older I get the more I believe that young earth creationist are...right and Darwinism which has now been changed to evolution...is a flat out lie. 5. If you look at the Mount Hellen eruption, layers were formed in minutes/hours not millions of years. Even the Grand Canyon, wasn't formed over millions of years, but from a catastrophe. The river at Mount Hellen formed in hours. The Grand Canyon slopes are so radical that it would be impossible for a river or rain to form it. It was a catastrophy. Bump as it got three positive votes without many views or responses. Just gonna bump it once. |
| burneracct User ID: 1712129 United States08/30/2018 02:07 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74482595 United States08/30/2018 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. [link to www.livescience.com (secure)] At least hundreds, possibly thousands, of transitional fossils have been found so far by researchers. The exact count is unclear because some lineages of organisms are continuously evolving. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74482595 United States08/30/2018 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. A New Transitional Bird Fossil Has Been Found This bird skull Ichthyornis adds new dates for when key features of modern birds appeared [link to ncse.com (secure)] Transitional Fossils Are Not Rare Fossils with transitional morphology are not rare. Fossils illustrating the gradual origin of humans, horses, rhinos, whales, seacows, mammals, birds, tetrapods, and various major Cambrian "phyla" have been discovered and are well-known to scientists. Explore Evolution's claims to the contrary are just a rehash of older creationist arguments on this point, relying on out-of-context quotes, confusion over terminology and classification, and ignoring inconvenient evidence. |
| Cozzy User ID: 75833507 United States08/30/2018 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. The Institute for Creation Research has a great website and convincing arguments. I went to a weekend seminar in the early 90s and was blown away by the evidence for a young earth and lack of evidence for evolution by ICR scientists. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74482595 United States08/30/2018 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. [link to r.search.yahoo.com (secure)] Mosaic evolution is a scientific theory that states traits can evolve independently from each other and at a different rate. This phenomenon is also the reason not every ancestral species has the same morphological traits. Another definition is the 'evolution of characters at various rates both within and between species'. It is a trend that can only be observed at the macro-scale and over thousands of years, as the evolution of different morphological traits can take hundreds of generations to manifest. There are several known examples in nature. These include: The early evolution of bipedalism - walking on two legs - in an early hominid species took place well before there was any significant change in the skull, or brain size. Evolution of the horse, in which the major changes took place at different times, not all simultaneously. Sea turtles evolved beaks and shells at around the same time but completely independently. Some species had a beak but not a shell and vice versa. This led to the modern-day species we see with both features. |
| hankie Everything User ID: 75555467 United States08/30/2018 02:23 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Evolution theory bite the dust sometime ago, to continue believing a lie is a fallacy of the mind, you lying to yourself, no one else. All other science know it fake as can be, does not compute. DNA proves it, natural science proved it, how many others to you need before you understand the Theory was a hoax to begin with, it was not evolution it was survival of a group of people and they were atheist. They declare themselves above others pure and simple. This is just part of their ways, put it out there they will eat it up. Now there is evidence in DNA and the geology records and the fact not one person existed until all of a sudden the modern mankind and animal came to be not just evolved full grown and just there, out of nothing they came to be. It how things seem to works. The first age of plants and a types of sea life and then land life and it was here for many thousand of years, the bibles also mention all this before man, then he cleaned the slate and made man. More evidence of this every day. Why do you think this nutcase decide we live in a matrix or hologram of a type? Sorry I got a headache These are the times that tries men's and women's souls! May we come though it victorious! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74482595 United States08/30/2018 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. think DIFFERENTLY there is an unseen mechanism behind it all Genesis 3:14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life [link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)] The ancestors of today’s slithery snakes once sported full-fledged arms and legs, but genetic mutations caused the reptiles to lose all four of their limbs about 150 million years ago, according to two new studies. The findings are welcome news to herpetologists, who have long wondered what genetic changes caused snakes to lose their arms and legs, the researchers said. It is NOT evolution Vs. Creation it is BOTH. Evolution is the MEANS. the PAINTBRUSH. |
| NikM755 (OP) User ID: 71632887 United States08/30/2018 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| NikM755 (OP) User ID: 71632887 United States08/30/2018 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Evolution theory bite the dust sometime ago, to continue believing a lie is a fallacy of the mind, you lying to yourself, no one else. Quoting: hankie All other science know it fake as can be, does not compute. DNA proves it, natural science proved it, how many others to you need before you understand the Theory was a hoax to begin with, it was not evolution it was survival of a group of people and they were atheist. They declare themselves above others pure and simple. This is just part of their ways, put it out there they will eat it up. Now there is evidence in DNA and the geology records and the fact not one person existed until all of a sudden the modern mankind and animal came to be not just evolved full grown and just there, out of nothing they came to be. It how things seem to works. The first age of plants and a types of sea life and then land life and it was here for many thousand of years, the bibles also mention all this before man, then he cleaned the slate and made man. More evidence of this every day. Why do you think this nutcase decide we live in a matrix or hologram of a type? Agreed. |
| Kakarot_ User ID: 13262209  Australia08/31/2018 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41173011 United States08/31/2018 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| NikM755 (OP) User ID: 71632887 United States08/31/2018 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Evolution itself is how life changes over time. The theory of evolution explains evolution. The mechanisms of evolution are a fact, observable and repeatable. Quoting: Kakarot_ Wrong. Darwinism (micro-evolution) which is now included in the word "evolution" is observable. That's where theres dogs and they all came from two dogs. That is observable evidence of creation not evolution. |
| glp-smilies User ID: 18811905 United States08/31/2018 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. 1. Up until 2014, scientist believed that earths water came from comets and asteroids. This theory was debunked when enough water was found within the earths crust to fill the oceans 4x over in ringwoodite. Quoting: NikM755 The Old Testament written over 3300 years ago States exactly that God sealed the water underneath the depths after the flood. How many of you remember Athiest claiming where did all the water come from? Water from space is a scientific thing already and explains several aspects of the Bible. 3. There is still not a single transitional fossil in existence. Only two years ago, did evolutionist start claiming one existed. Except, they lied. They don't. The fossils they claim are transitional, are actually unique, but are not transitional. Quoting: NikM755 Futurama explained this perfectly, with examples. 4. Obviously, creation (the big bang), God created man from the dust (abiogenis), are all theories that were taken and corrupted from the Bible to support evolution. Quoting: NikM755 The Big Bang requires some better understanding of the purpose of science. No one knows for sure that the Big Bang is correct. We don't know the explanation for why we exist, but there HAS TO BE ONE. There has to be SOMETHING to set in motion how all the rest of the stuff science has accurately explained came to be. The Big Bang is the result of an observation, that all celestial bodies appear to be moving away from a central spot. Maybe the creation of the universe and everything expanding are unrelated, but we have no other alternative reason to believe that. Humans are infatuated with beginning and end, and time. Those things MUST exist in order for us to rationalize something. The Big Bang is *only* the best explanation we have to explain the beginning of existence. And even then we know it doesn't actually explain the beginning, because we still can't wrap our minds around the idea that nothing existed before that. But that is a limitation of our ability to rationalize the universe and correlate everything with time. |
| Kakarot_ User ID: 13262209 Australia09/01/2018 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Evolution itself is how life changes over time. The theory of evolution explains evolution. The mechanisms of evolution are a fact, observable and repeatable. Quoting: Kakarot_ Wrong. Darwinism (micro-evolution) which is now included in the word "evolution" is observable. That's where theres dogs and they all came from two dogs. That is observable evidence of creation not evolution. Evolution is change. The theory of evolution explains how the change happens, which are the observed mechanisms of evolution. "Macroevolution" does not have different mechanisms, there is only evolution. Macroevolution is simply speciation, the result of microevolution. Dogs did not come from just two dogs, dogs have evolved from dog-like species according to the fossil record. Don't you realize how many extinct species they have found in the fossil record? And fossilization is extremely rare and most that get fossilized get destroyed by earth or will never be found. |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 8385450 United States09/01/2018 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... ...who am I to stop them?        TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator.     I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| Kakarot_ User ID: 13262209 Australia09/01/2018 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... Quoting: TheLordsServant ...who am I to stop them? TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator. We did not evolve from monkeys or gorillas or chimps, only people who say that are creationists because they have no idea what evolution is. Humans ARE apes. Endogenous Retroviruses have already 100% proven we share common ancestors with all the other ape species and old world monkeys. |
| Spur-Man User ID: 75814481 Australia09/01/2018 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... Quoting: TheLordsServant ...who am I to stop them? TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator. Unlike you, I understand that what I want has no impact on reality. Scientists don't want to believe they came from apes, they just follow the evidence where it leads. You on the other hand, have blind faith in what ever story makes you feel good. Most people who accept evolution believe in God. You foolishly dismiss them all as 'God-haters' because you want that to be the case. It's a lot easier to just attack someone's character then it is to actually evaluate their argument and question your own beliefs. Creationism is for simpletons. |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 76896371 United States09/02/2018 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... Quoting: TheLordsServant ...who am I to stop them? TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator. Unlike you, I understand that what I want has no impact on reality. Scientists don't want to believe they came from apes, they just follow the evidence where it leads. You on the other hand, have blind faith in what ever story makes you feel good. Most people who accept evolution believe in God. You foolishly dismiss them all as 'God-haters' because you want that to be the case. It's a lot easier to just attack someone's character then it is to actually evaluate their argument and question your own beliefs. Creationism is for simpletons. 1. There's no PROOF to this remark. If anything, evolution has been forced down the throats of every public school child since the Scopes Monkey Trial. That, and the fact that Creationism is BANNED from being taught in public schools pretty much dooms your azzumption. The removal of prayer from classrooms broadened Darwinism's affects. 2. This comment only solidifies my previous comments. Atheists latched onto Darwinism like flies on dung when it first came out. Only in the last 30 years or so have the tides begin turning, with more and more scientists seeing the vast complexity of the universe, which points to Intelligent Design and thus, a Creator. Many more are afraid of stating such for fear of being ostracized by the atheistic scientific community. Last Edited by Servant-of-the-LORD on 09/02/2018 11:55 AM I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| Broomsgoat User ID: 61909697 United States09/02/2018 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Obviously, creation (the big bang), God created man from the dust (abiogenis), are all theories that were taken and corrupted from the Bible to support evolution. One thing i can believe is, when GOD said "let there be light", there was a very BIG BANG. |
| Spur-Man User ID: 75814481 Australia09/03/2018 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... Quoting: TheLordsServant ...who am I to stop them? TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator. Unlike you, I understand that what I want has no impact on reality. Scientists don't want to believe they came from apes, they just follow the evidence where it leads. You on the other hand, have blind faith in what ever story makes you feel good. Most people who accept evolution believe in God. You foolishly dismiss them all as 'God-haters' because you want that to be the case. It's a lot easier to just attack someone's character then it is to actually evaluate their argument and question your own beliefs. Creationism is for simpletons. 1. There's no PROOF to this remark. If anything, evolution has been forced down the throats of every public school child since the Scopes Monkey Trial. That, and the fact that Creationism is BANNED from being taught in public schools pretty much dooms your azzumption. The removal of prayer from classrooms broadened Darwinism's affects. 2. This comment only solidifies my previous comments. Atheists latched onto Darwinism like flies on dung when it first came out. Only in the last 30 years or so have the tides begin turning, with more and more scientists seeing the vast complexity of the universe, which points to Intelligent Design and thus, a Creator. Many more are afraid of stating such for fear of being ostracized by the atheistic scientific community. Surveys indicate that most scientists are theists. What you fail to consider is that people can believe in evolution and God at the same time. Not all Christians are Creationists. Creationism isn't merely the assertion that an intelligence created the universe, it's the assertion that animals were created fully formed in their current state by magic. Creationists state that the earth is about 6000 years old and that Noah's flood happened 4000 years ago. These things conflict with the evidence, not just evolution theory. Creationism shouldn't be taught in science class because it's not science. |
| King of Karaoke User ID: 75021383 United States09/03/2018 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Ancient Aliens called, and invites you to watch. Meanwhile...  Last Edited by King of Karaoke on 09/03/2018 12:27 AM I'm a driver, I'm a winner. Things are going to change, I can feel it. |
| ToSeek User ID: 9653749 United States09/03/2018 12:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. If Darwinists want to believe that they evolved from monkeys and apes... Quoting: TheLordsServant ...who am I to stop them? TEACHING that crap as fact is an entirely different matter. Those who vigorously push the theory are just God-haters & deniers of a Creator. Unlike you, I understand that what I want has no impact on reality. Scientists don't want to believe they came from apes, they just follow the evidence where it leads. You on the other hand, have blind faith in what ever story makes you feel good. Most people who accept evolution believe in God. You foolishly dismiss them all as 'God-haters' because you want that to be the case. It's a lot easier to just attack someone's character then it is to actually evaluate their argument and question your own beliefs. Creationism is for simpletons. 1. There's no PROOF to this remark. If anything, evolution has been forced down the throats of every public school child since the Scopes Monkey Trial. Apparently you don't realize that Scopes was convicted. It wasn't until 1968 that the Supreme Court overturned an Arkansas law that prohibited the teaching of evolution. Even now surveys of science teachers show that many of them dodge the topic to avoid creating a controversy. |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 51993462 United States09/03/2018 12:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. 1. There's no PROOF to this remark. If anything, evolution has been forced down the throats of every public school child since the Scopes Monkey Trial. Quoting: TheLordsServant That, and the fact that Creationism is BANNED from being taught in public schools pretty much dooms your azzumption. The removal of prayer from classrooms broadened Darwinism's affects. 2. This comment only solidifies my previous comments. Atheists latched onto Darwinism like flies on dung when it first came out. Only in the last 30 years or so have the tides begin turning, with more and more scientists seeing the vast complexity of the universe, which points to Intelligent Design and thus, a Creator. Many more are afraid of stating such for fear of being ostracized by the atheistic scientific community. Surveys indicate that most scientists are theists. What you fail to consider is that people can believe in evolution and God at the same time. Not all Christians are Creationists. Creationism isn't merely the assertion that an intelligence created the universe, it's the assertion that animals were created fully formed in their current state by magic. Creationists state that the earth is about 6000 years old and that Noah's flood happened 4000 years ago. These things conflict with the evidence, not just evolution theory. Creationism shouldn't be taught in science class because it's not science. "most scientists are theists"? Got a link to prove that statement? "fully formed in their current state by magic"? Not by magic...but by God / Yahuah and His Son Jesus / Yeshua. Evolution is nothing more than a theory. There's no proof that the dating of fossils is accurate. Dinosaur tissue is a major problem for "old earth" and those against the discovery are for the most part just attacking the scientists. Apparently you don't realize that Scopes was convicted. It wasn't until 1968 that the Supreme Court overturned an Arkansas law that prohibited the teaching of evolution. Even now surveys of science teachers show that many of them dodge the topic to avoid creating a controversy. Quoting: ToSeek Regardless of the outcome of the original trial, it's clear to see that the theory evolution as a "scientific fact" had it's roots in that trial. Dodge what topic? Evolution? Sure is odd then that it remains to be taught as fact versus theory. I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| Kakarot_ User ID: 13262209 Australia09/03/2018 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. 1. There's no PROOF to this remark. If anything, evolution has been forced down the throats of every public school child since the Scopes Monkey Trial. Quoting: TheLordsServant That, and the fact that Creationism is BANNED from being taught in public schools pretty much dooms your azzumption. The removal of prayer from classrooms broadened Darwinism's affects. 2. This comment only solidifies my previous comments. Atheists latched onto Darwinism like flies on dung when it first came out. Only in the last 30 years or so have the tides begin turning, with more and more scientists seeing the vast complexity of the universe, which points to Intelligent Design and thus, a Creator. Many more are afraid of stating such for fear of being ostracized by the atheistic scientific community. Surveys indicate that most scientists are theists. What you fail to consider is that people can believe in evolution and God at the same time. Not all Christians are Creationists. Creationism isn't merely the assertion that an intelligence created the universe, it's the assertion that animals were created fully formed in their current state by magic. Creationists state that the earth is about 6000 years old and that Noah's flood happened 4000 years ago. These things conflict with the evidence, not just evolution theory. Creationism shouldn't be taught in science class because it's not science. "most scientists are theists"? Got a link to prove that statement? "fully formed in their current state by magic"? Not by magic...but by God / Yahuah and His Son Jesus / Yeshua. Evolution is nothing more than a theory. There's no proof that the dating of fossils is accurate. Dinosaur tissue is a major problem for "old earth" and those against the discovery are for the most part just attacking the scientists. Apparently you don't realize that Scopes was convicted. It wasn't until 1968 that the Supreme Court overturned an Arkansas law that prohibited the teaching of evolution. Even now surveys of science teachers show that many of them dodge the topic to avoid creating a controversy. Quoting: ToSeek Regardless of the outcome of the original trial, it's clear to see that the theory evolution as a "scientific fact" had it's roots in that trial. Dodge what topic? Evolution? Sure is odd then that it remains to be taught as fact versus theory. Evolution is a fact. Life changes over time. The theory of evolution explains how life changes over time, the mechanisms of evolution. Mutation, Natural Selection, Genetic Drift, Gene Flow. These are all observed and reproducible. That is why evolution is considered fact and theory. Theories in science do not become law or fact, theory in science is as high as it gets. If its a scientific theory, its based on a lot of evidence. Cell theory isn't going anywhere, neither is evolution theory. Last Edited by Kakarot_ on 09/03/2018 12:40 PM |
| Shaell User ID: 43159436 United States09/03/2018 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. Don't forget the fact that the only way a fossil can be made is if the organism is buried in a flood deposit. As in - every dinosaur or other fossil found was wiped out in a catastrophic flood. Last Edited by Shaell on 09/03/2018 12:43 PM |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 51993462 United States09/03/2018 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. "most scientists are theists"? Got a link to prove that statement? Quoting: TheLordsServant "fully formed in their current state by magic"? Not by magic...but by God / Yahuah and His Son Jesus / Yeshua. Evolution is nothing more than a theory. There's no proof that the dating of fossils is accurate. Dinosaur tissue is a major problem for "old earth" and those against the discovery are for the most part just attacking the scientists. Regardless of the outcome of the original trial, it's clear to see that the theory evolution as a "scientific fact" had it's roots in that trial. Dodge what topic? Evolution? Sure is odd then that it remains to be taught as fact versus theory. Evolution is a fact. Life changes over time. The theory of evolution explains how life changes over time, the mechanisms of evolution. Mutation, Natural Selection, Genetic Drift, Gene Flow. These are all observed and reproducible. That is why evolution is considered fact and theory. Theories in science do not become law or fact, theory in science is as high as it gets. If its a scientific theory, its based on a lot of evidence. Cell theory isn't going anywhere, neither is evolution theory.  The basis for evolution...that ALL life came from primordial soup...is NOT a fact. Look at how intricate EVERYTHING is. The solar system, the position of the earth, the size and distance of the sun. The earth's magnetic field, weather and the rain cycle, the seasons. DNA ALL that....happened by chance? As far as the scientific community is, Ben Stein's documentary "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" is telling, and the denial by the community at large is nothing more than a whitewash of the facts.  Last Edited by Servant-of-the-LORD on 09/03/2018 01:06 PM I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 51993462 United States09/03/2018 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Spur-Man User ID: 75814481 Australia09/04/2018 07:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Young Earth Creationist vs Evolution: Global Flood, tissue in T-rex, not a single transitional fossil has been found. "most scientists are theists"? Got a link to prove that statement? Quoting: TheLordsServant "fully formed in their current state by magic"? Not by magic...but by God / Yahuah and His Son Jesus / Yeshua. Evolution is nothing more than a theory. There's no proof that the dating of fossils is accurate. Dinosaur tissue is a major problem for "old earth" and those against the discovery are for the most part just attacking the scientists. Regardless of the outcome of the original trial, it's clear to see that the theory evolution as a "scientific fact" had it's roots in that trial. Dodge what topic? Evolution? Sure is odd then that it remains to be taught as fact versus theory. Evolution is a fact. Life changes over time. The theory of evolution explains how life changes over time, the mechanisms of evolution. Mutation, Natural Selection, Genetic Drift, Gene Flow. These are all observed and reproducible. That is why evolution is considered fact and theory. Theories in science do not become law or fact, theory in science is as high as it gets. If its a scientific theory, its based on a lot of evidence. Cell theory isn't going anywhere, neither is evolution theory. The basis for evolution...that ALL life came from primordial soup...is NOT a fact. The primordial soup is not the 'basis of evolution' what ever that means. No one even uses that term anymore, except for Creationists. Today, the RNA world hypothesis is probably the most popular idea about the beginning of life, and not all evolutionary biologists think there was a single common ancestor for all life. You should stop learning about evolution from Creationists because they have an agenda to misinform you. Look at how intricate EVERYTHING is. Quoting: TheLordsServant The solar system, the position of the earth, the size and distance of the sun. The earth's magnetic field, weather and the rain cycle, the seasons. DNA ALL that....happened by chance? If the universe was created by an omnipotent, omniscient god, then there is no such thing as chance. Every leaf that falls from a tree was part of his plan. LIkewise, all of nature -including evolution- is part of his plan too. The position of the solar system has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution describes how lifeforms change. Saying 'the solar system is intricate, therefor lifeforms do not change over time' makes no sense what so ever. Do you understand that? As far as the scientific community is, Ben Stein's documentary "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" is telling, and the denial by the community at large is nothing more than a whitewash of the facts. Quoting: TheLordsServant Ben Stein's expelled is exactly the kind of dishonest, propaganda that creates misinformed people like you. Most Scientists believe in God. Theists are not being persecuted. Creationism is not accepted by the scientific community because it's not science. It's as simple as that. |
