The planes were CGI.
I'm afraid I'm useless at keeping track of links, so I can't point you to the evidence. But I can tell you there's a video taken from a helicopter that show the towers at a wide angle, then zooms in, and then the plane enters the frame and hits the tower. The thing is, there was no plane in the zoomed out part of the clip, which it would have to be if the plane was real!
Another thing is that a lot of people who were there report that they didn't see the planes personally, but someone nearby yelled out "OMG, a plane just hit the tower!" or something like that. Seems they had hired people to plant the idea so people would think they saw it, or at least not question those who say they did.
Quoting: The Monk pretty cheap theory to be honest. Aren't you aware how many thousands of eyes were fixed on these towers as soon the initial smoke became visible to the public? The 2nd plane hit after that.
I'm not saying that I believe everything I see on tv let alone news channels
but there were more than enough eye witnesses around that day. Why would they lie to us?I'm Sydney based, and bro-inlaw is high banker wanker and was in NY on the day of 911 with delegation of roughly 30 folks from his company. He remembers the second plane hitting and saw the explosion from their vantage point, and so did the others apparently.
At a bbq at their place, in I think 2002, someone mentioned my interest in the 911 saga, and how I believed it was not planes and terrorists who brought down the three buildings.
Firstly 3 buildings? Err there were only two... well that blew their minds when they realised building 7 also fell, with no plane hit.
Then, when I questioned them on the second plane hit, they all recalled the explosion. But they described what they saw on TV, not any descriptions of any planes they actually saw. Not one of them actually saw a plane, despite staring at the unfolding disaster the whole time. But their stories always start with "I saw this Boeing come flying in and smash into the building, with this massive fire ball".
My point is,
they were there, they saw an explosion and all the fires and people running, and debris, and the first building fall, and then they left the city like most folks and watched it all again and again, and again, and again on TV.
There is a term for it, but I cant recall it for the life of me. None of them were lying, they just merged what they saw, what they felt and what they saw on TV together.
But they're still all evil fuck banker wankers in my book!
CaptDan, you remind me of a talk I had with a gentleman recently beside a lake.
Quoting: Sicksent Hi SS! havent sen you around for a while mate.
I posted your amazing links to all the good stuff on Dufontain's master thread of GLP classics.
Cheers, BHD
--------------------------------
And Cap'n Dan, wow, thanks mate for taking the time to tell your story and share your incites of the day and beyond.
Have you seen or read much of Rebekah Roth's info on the day, from a flight attendent's perspective?
That is fascinating also, and would link in well to a lot of what you are saying. Indeed she mentions a lot of pilots corroborate what she has been saying.
Her take on the flight attendent's calls is that they were on the ground and in a hanger, likely ina room being prompted in those calls.
No engine noise in the bgnd for starters, and in Betty Ong's call, she mentions a hijacker standing at the top of the stairs. 747 maybe, but not 757 or 767! Only stairs are the mobile ones that lead up to the plane, or to a mezz level inside a hanger.
Food for thought.
I also have no issues with planes being inserted into video footage on the hop. It would have been harder back then, but easy now, and with all technology, that is the case. Photoshop used to be a heavily guarded 1980's tech, out of Israel, but every kid has it now! LOL
My initial post above regarding how folks recall things, especially under extreme conditions is fascinating.
That most of the people being interviewed on the TV networks were nearly all affiliated with the stations or in the video industry is not a surprise. It's a pretty crazy list when you go through who was on air that morning, and amazingly coincidental eh?
Who can forget the baseball cap wearing A-typical American guy who "saw the plane slam into the side of the building and then watched it collapse, mostly due to the intense fire from the jet fuel melting the steel beams". What an analysis only minutes after the event.....
They did find him you know, and he is a known bit part actor. If only they could find out who paid him and who gave him the script.....
This event is far from being over in people's minds, and whilst a horrible subject, is weirdly uniting (no pun) on a global scale. It may have happened in NY, and most of the folks who perished on the day at the sites were US citizens, but the rest of us watching instinctively knew something was off. I know I did, and I wont stop researching, watching, talking, listening and theorising until the day the truth comes to light.
Thanks again for sharing Cap'n Dan.
BTW, do you know/talk to J Lear? He's a very interesting fella, and is very easy to contact. He also believes it was impossible, and that CGI planes were used.
