British physicist, microwave weapons expert warns of extreme health danger of 5G; says those pushing it should be executed

So is the evidence to the contrary supplied by 5G interests. We have to ask that question too.

Rather than to discredit the messenger, why not try to establish the veracity in his claims? That would seem to me to be a better and more productive course of action.

It's no secret that there have been many studies done primarily in Europe pointing to damage done to living beings by microwaves at different frequencies.

Putting Trower aside, here is a peer reviewed article for you:

International Appeal: Scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure
Article (PDF Available)  in European Journal of Oncology Volume 20(n. 3/4):pp. 180-182 · December 2015 

We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).

(PDF) International Appeal: Scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure. Available from: [link to www.researchgate.net (secure)] [accessed Sep 13 2018].

From cancer.org:

"A study by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) exposed large groups of lab rats and mice to types of RF energy used in cell phones. The animals were exposed over their entire bodies for about 9 hours a day, starting before birth and continuing for up to 2 years. In a draft report of the final results (issued in February 2018), the study found an increased risk of rare heart tumors called malignant schwannomas in the male rats exposed to RF radiation, although there was no increased risk among female rats or among male or female mice in the study. The male rats also lived longer than rats who were not exposed to RF radiation, for unclear reasons. Some aspects of this study make it hard to know what these results might mean for people, but the results add evidence to the idea that RF radiation might potentially impact human health."

This study suggests that microwaves can cause cancer (due to DNA mutations) in rats subjected to low-mid frequency microwaves. It would be interesting if the study had been done in two parts, one with rats being subjected to radiation for their entire life cycle and the other being done only after reaching maturity. That would provide evidence immature cells are more susceptible.

Other studies indicate the same. Once you move away from the political science and start looking into research on rats the evidence for DNA mutation becomes more evident.

search: "microwave radiation on rats"

If it is established that high levels of microwaves can cause non-heating effects then it follows that risk decreases with exposure but that it never reaches zero.

Therefore, a proper experiment would entail a multi-generational study of rats using various frequencies. In addition to a control group there would need to be a variety of test groups, some with single targeted frequencies, some with a full band, some with traditional levels of non-natural radiation and some with the various planned for the future levels/frequencies. It would result in an expensive study requiring a large facility and a testing time of 5-20 years, the longer the better. Only then could we establish the risk of such systems.

To suggest that because microwaves are non-ionizing they cannot damage the human species at levels below the heating threshold is an ignorant argument based on the idea that we know everything there is to know about the effects of non-ionizing radiation. Small scale studies suggest this is not the case.

Last Edited by Sciencefan on 09/13/2018 12:14 PM

Many people are saying the same! IF he were the only one I would say yeah crackpot BUT even IT people at my job has said the same. The more this stuff cranks up the more health issues will occur with man and animal. Behaviors will become more erratic as well. You know how when some one says a house is haunted but it is proven its the energy coming off the appliances and people see and hear things? You don't think the higher this stuff cranks up the worse health issues will be?

BIG money behind microwave weapons, black Ops... my own country, the USA I'm sure.

The main age death of my cities obituaries are 50s and 60s, Truly it is the end.

Actual tin foil does relay insulate against microwaves, etc. so, it isn't far off that tin foil hat co.'s will be doing gangbusters.

I see tin foil roofing material, wallpaper, etc.

MI5 agent Dr. Barrie Trower: About Mind Control
[link to www.mindcontrol.se]

for those of you idiots who would like to discredit this stuff because your authoritarian educational systems have no studies, Heil Hitler. All the evidence i need is my direct experience where i used to live in an apartment where the microwave oven was situated between the wifi router and my laptop; every time the thing was on, i had no internet....that's all the evidence i need to see the frequencies in action....do us all a favor and stare into your microwave oven, while cooking your food, maybe you're brains will come out well done and you will have more IQ points.