Professor Darwin's dark ages Sci-Fy Cult of 'Evolution', how did plants live before photosynthesis evolved?

I've gone to both. I sincerely doubt what you're saying is true. Darwin wrote origin of species decades before a catholic priest came up with the big bang. Neither of them are 'atheistic' ideas. Theists and atheists both reject/ accept evolution/big bang.

Why won't you tell me how plants were made? See, you need to lie about evolution in order to make it look silly. I don't need to lie about your position.

Young earth Creationists believe that 6000 years ago, an eternal supernatural entity, used magic to create a fully formed adult man out of non-living dirt. Then he took a rib out of the man and made a woman out of of it. After a talking snake tricked them into eating a magic apple, the children of these two committed incest for 2000 years until the entire earth was covered by a flood. All animals and humans today descend from the occupants of a single boat.

the before-plants
some other form of energy
slow process of millions of years
the new method
not very complicated
Professor Darwin, is this you still pitching your Sci-Fy hoax from the dark ages before science into the twenty first century from the grave?

DGN, the book of Genesis says that plants were created before the sun. YOU believe in 'before-plants' that didn't require the sun, and used 'some other' energy.

And by the way, the dark ages were before Darwin. Back when Christians said the earth was flat and burnt people alive for disagreeing.

The first plants evolved from eukaryotes. They were already eating sunlight before they became plants. Is that what you were asking?

stop posting retarded evolution questions when you haven't bothered to learn evolution

The before-plants had some other form of energy, probably from the soil, and a slow process of millions of years the plants used more and more of the photosynthesis, which probably had started as some kind of benign cancer lol - over the millions of years it slowly shifts more and more to the new method, relying less on the content of the soil so being more hardy and able to spread... not very complicated.

No, explain the complex bio-molecular intelligent design/assembly/operation/replication of eukaryotes, without a mind.

No, the universe came about by random chance expansion.
Somehow earth showed up out of this with accidental constants leading to the possibility of life.

Then at some point, non-life became alive for no/all reasons.Then simple stuff started to gradually evolve into slightly more complicated stuff.
Ofcourse all the stuff looks designed, but it really isn't designed. Eventually primates evolved into more hardcore primates which we call humans.

We humans destroy our environment and within the next 1 million years, humans will gradually evolve into T-1000's. We are already evolving every day, we haven't substantially changed or evolved in 250-350k years according to all gathered scientific knowledge and history, but I can assure you, in the light of biology we are evolving.

Very soon, non humans will be born out of humans.

For science.

Yes this is so true, in fact some humans are upgrading as we speak because mutation = sophistication.

I just think team australia's point of view is mighty interesting.

Everything evolves, all the time, since the beginning of time. And everything that doesnt evolve, didnt need to evolve, therefore evolution and stasis go hand in hand as another miracle of life/nature/other/(but surely not a creative hand).

Yes this is so true, in fact some humans are upgrading as we speak because mutation = sophistication.

There is zero record of any species ever turning into a different one, just a sfi-Fy hoax on the gullible.

There is zero record of any species ever turning into a different one, just a sfi-Fy hoax on the gullible.

I just think team australia's point of view is mighty interesting.

Everything evolves, all the time, since the beginning of time. And everything that doesnt evolve, didnt need to evolve, therefore evolution and stasis go hand in hand as another miracle of life/nature/other/(but surely not a creative hand).

the before-plants
some other form of energy
slow process of millions of years
the new method
not very complicated
Professor Darwin, is this you still pitching your Sci-Fy hoax from the dark ages before science into the twenty first century from the grave?

DGN, the book of Genesis says that plants were created before the sun. YOU believe in 'before-plants' that didn't require the sun, and used 'some other' energy.

And by the way, the dark ages were before Darwin. Back when Christians said the earth was flat and burnt people alive for disagreeing.

Basic biology is interesting.

Dogs came from wolves, yet there are still wolves. The wolves have as you put it 'remained in stasis.' You have a problem with this?

You are wanting 80% this 20% that 60% this 40% that fossils/animals, because you can't be bothered researching what evolution is. After 10 years you have been on here you could have been an expert evolutionary biologist by now.

Please share how and when the first wolves originated.

Let me make a quick scientific guess, they evolved from proto-wolves aka miacids and then stasis kicked in?