Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,218 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,225,046
Pageviews Today: 2,045,859Threads Today: 840Posts Today: 14,625
07:36 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Soham Murders: Huntley & Carr Innocent?

 
SovereignMe

User ID: 65833029
United Kingdom
10/16/2018 08:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Soham Murders: Huntley & Carr Innocent?
I followed the actual case. And the reporting, both mainstream and otherwise.

He may have been convicted, but the whole thing stank.

His lawyer helped convict him. So you were never going to see an appeal.

You can bang on about Lexis Nexis all you want, but it won’t change my opinion that he was stitched up.
Cognitive_Dissident  (OP)

User ID: 71265287
United Kingdom
10/16/2018 08:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Soham Murders: Huntley & Carr Innocent?
The hairs were huntleys.

What about the finger prints and hand prints? Whats your opinion on them?

What about the prior knowledge before it was announced?

It is good to question everything. But im not sure if you are doing it just troll.

Again...ill ask you to go to Nexus Lexus and sign up so you will have access to the whole court proceedings.

You dont need to read what others are speculating. You dont need to read newspapers and you dont need to watch youtube videos. There you will see the whole case and the circumstances around. You will go through the evidence in an impartial manner using the exact same information which convicted him.

Each piece of evidence has a legal eye questioned who is impartial and explains the for and against and is questioned by both parties.

Use the actual case to make your case.

You are clearly asking questions about it. So do yourself a favour and get access to the actual facts.
 Quoting: Shirtless Kirk


List of forensic evidence found;

[link to webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk]

What hand prints?

And it's naive to think the whole picture of this case lies in the court proceedings. Commentary from other sources are not hearsay, rather sound findings based on irregularities in media coverage and how the case was handled.
“Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance” - Einstein

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" - Voltaire
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77025702
United Kingdom
10/16/2018 10:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Soham Murders: Huntley & Carr Innocent?
...


EXACTLY
 Quoting: lurcher1


That's what appeals are for.
 Quoting: Shirtless Kirk


There is no automatic right to appeal.
 Quoting: lurcher1


Of course there isnt.

But if there was any doubt legally then an appeal could be granted.

For instance, the person they put away for killing Jill Dando.

Michael Mansfield QC managed to prove the doubts for an appeal and finally got him out.

If there was any doubt, then someone help him launch an appeal.

At this moment, rather than proclaim innocence, he has instead changed his name to nicola and asking to seen as a woman.

I would expect this course of action is to get himself moved to a womens prison.

I dont think there was a cover up. I dont think he is innocent at all.

You can make a conspiracy out of anything.

You could even look at the Saville case and see how many of the claims against him have been thrown out of court due to the fact that many of the claims did not add up.

Such as one person saying they were taken to the dressing rooms behind the set to be abused. But the the actual set in question did not have dressing rooms as it was the BBC studio which has big doors to allow all kinds of vehicles on the set and the dressing rooms were actually outside of the studio and in another across the road.

Others claims alleged he did stuff when he couldnt have even been in the country at the time.

So maybe he was innocent all along? Maybe they chose to use him as a distraction after death so he could not prove that he never did it. Maybe someone still living did those things and they put them on saville to avoid the truth?

No of course he did it.

Just like Huntley did it.

Maybe Huntley knew of perverts at the USAF Lakenheath. Maybe he even had contact with them as we know pedos stick together.

Perhaps he thought by dumping the bodies there, that someone would assume that a USAF Serviceman did it?

They found fingerprints, palm prints, dna from hair, fibers which showed contact.

Not to mention that Huntley said on camera that he was probably the last person to see them alive, despite not yet knowing if they were dead.

He also asked if the police had found the clothes after the bodies were found. At that time no information had been released about them having their clothes removed.

Was all that forced out of him? Because at that stage he had not been charged and was helping the police on his own initiative.

He did it.
 Quoting: Shirtless Kirk


Dando was different, she was an English Rose and there were many TV programmes made casting doubt on Barry George being the perpetrator. THEN and only then, the hudiciary were effectively forced to reopen the case, which is when mansfield finally got on board.

These are very different circumstances. Ask the families of the servicemen who were blamed for flying a Chinook that should have been grounded into the Mull of Kintyre. It took twenty five years for the MOD to even admit the US fleet was inoperable. They got the retraction of 'pilot error' only by the skin of their teeth.

Then Sandra Uttley and Dunblane, No chance!

The state is happier to bury people alive and especially certain people and things. Are you going to convince a TV programme, or newspaper to investigate Huntley? No chance, the people of the UK would not be too impressed either.

It's no good just repeating 'He did it' over and over again. If you are basing that on what happened and what you know, you might realise that if YOU were the judge, you might want to see better evidence an a better administration of law.

The rules of law are skewed in the UK. Our judiciary is regarded the most corrupt of any developed nation in the West. I dont know if you have any personal experience of coming up against the crown, or civil law, or whatever, but it is a sobering experience to see corruption in plain sight.

Having looked at where the bodies were left, I would have to say that it would have made no sense for Huntley (deranged or otherwise) to have taken them towards a monitored and patrolled military base, when anywhere else in a 360 circle would have been far, far easier. Also, the distance from the point where you could not drive anymore to where the bodies were found is considerbale. It would have taken some time to move those bodies one at a time and at any time, he's vehicle and he could have been observed.

Interesting to see that there is a through way, or a main road that passes right through Soham to Lakenheath. Soham must have been very familiar as an aterial route to the base passed through it.
Truth Geeza

User ID: 75326451
United Kingdom
10/16/2018 04:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Soham Murders: Huntley & Carr Innocent?
It was a kangaroo court and the bodies were dumped right by RAF Lakenheath in full view of the control tower. Blair didn't want any big scandal just before the start of the war on terror with Bush





GLP