Chemtrails?

Nope, not chemtrails. They are standard issue contrails.

No Shit Sherlock.
These have been around for over 25 years/you're just noticing them now?

We all gotta start somewhere. It's a safe bet you weren't born with infinite wisdom so why not give OP a break? There could be several reasons for being 25 years behind.


Just waking up?
Young age?
Never before looked up and said, "wtf!"?
Just got access to the internet and traveled further than silly pet tricks on youtube?

yep, standard chemtrails.

Exactly right!

Actually, DeeAnn, no need to be ugly about this. If you think contrails only showed up around 25 years ago you are not well informed, either. They've been documented since around the time aircraft could reach the altitude necessary for them to form...circa 1916-18.

This is a topic with much acrimony on these forums. Let's, please, be gentle trying to provide some real education and information on this issue.

something that bunch of planes lay down in the sky and what lingers for hours spreading by wind and white out the entire visible sky, i lived long before late 90's when 'contrails' began to do that.

[link to www.gpo.gov (secure)]

Chem Trail Patent
[link to patents.google.com (secure)]

hundreds of related patents.

Pleased re-read the patent and explore the fact that this method of geoengineering has never been implemented, and is not considered to be a viable option by geoengineering experts.

Current opinions indicate such methods "might" be considered in the future using sulfate aerosols at much higher altitudes...altitudes well above theoretical aircraft dispersal...but has not been tested.

I know exactly what they are Sherlock Holmes. I wanted to see what GLP thinks.

Looks exactly like Atlanta, Georgia today.

DARPA don't need no Stink'in Patents

here is why forests burn like crazy and hard to stop, everything saturated with Al.

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

OP, I stuck up for you a few posts up the thread. I'm hoping some real and civil conversation and trading of fact-backed opinions evolve from this thread. Thank you for posting on the subject in a way that leaves it open to thoughtful and reasoned response,

Too often, the contrail/chemtrail controversy descends into name calling, insults and chaos. Perhaps, this time, it will remain amiable and reasonable...

"Current Opinions"? Scientific.

[link to carnicominstitute.org (secure)]

[link to carnicominstitute.org (secure)]

from above article:
"If the dissipation of an observed contrail does not conform to the
model above, and the corresponding physics and chemistry and math of
same, then the logical conclusion that can be drawn is that the
material of emission is not likely to be water vapor."

[link to carnicominstitute.org (secure)]
Cornicom Institute has a lot of reference materials.

If "everything" is saturated with Al as you imply, and is responsible for forests to "burn like crazy" ...shouldn't any fire (forest or not) that starts anywhere consume everything and be virtually unstoppable?

I'm not being sarcastic but am asking for your logic in saying so.

i watching this since 1999. look around on the ground, cats trees and bushes... [link to carnicominstitute.org (secure)]

you can be sarcastic if you wish, i was arguing with debunkers in 1999 on Carnicom forum. i try not to do it any more, i have my studies and it is convincing for me.

Thank you, Ole...it's refreshing to be able to exchange opinions here in a civil and respectful way. My best to you...

same to you, thanks

Youtube changed alittle bit when you enter chemtrails into the search bar, it comes up with some note that says:

picture
IMAGE ( [link to image.ibb.co (secure)] )


Last Edited by ControllingTransmission1986 on 10/24/2018 12:07 AM

we shall see

None here is Escondido Ca for a week!

I have zero respect for this "chemtrail" crowd. Everything they see is a chemtrail.