|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
11/14/2018 :Nasa Scientist warns : Lack of sunspots to bring Space Age Record Cold, matter of months...// UPDATE 11 jan 2019 ... IT HAS BEGUN P7
|
|
Poster Handle
|
jake |
|
Post Content
|
...He is basing his argument on the number of spotless days. We had more spotless days in 2009 and 2008 (recent history). Spotless Days 2018 total: 190 days (60%) 2009 total: 260 days (71%)
2008 total: 268 days (73%) 2009 the Second Warmest Year on Record---> A NASA ARTICLE [ link to www.nasa.gov (secure)] 2008 Calendar year 2008 was the coolest year since 2000, but it was still in the top ten warmest years since the start of record-keeping in 1880.-----> Another NASA ARTICLE [ link to earthobservatory.nasa.gov (secure)] So, his argument holds ZERO water. Again, this is pure BULLSHIT Quoting: jake warmest year on record because of Fukushima dummy coast off of Japan is still in a full rolling boil Prove it. And please refrain from calling me "dummy", I'm not a dummy. I've been studying space weather for 30 years and have NEVER seen anyone attribute solar minimums and maximums to weather. This is absurd and ridiculous. If this theory was true, then our weather would fluctuate like a son of a bitch, based on the amount of sunspots we've had some years, we'd be french fried by now. So if you want to find "reasons" to justify it, go ahead. I'm done on this thread. 2018 total: 190 days (60%) 2017 total: 104 days (28%) 2016 total: 32 days (9%) 2015 total: 0 days (0%) 2014 total: 1 day (<1%) 2013 total: 0 days (0%) 2012 total: 0 days (0%) 2011 total: 2 days (<1%) 2010 total: 51 days (14%) 2009 total: 260 days (71%) 2008 total: 268 days (73%) 2007 total: 152 days (42%) 2006 total: 70 days (19%) Runs the most accurate weather prediction center in the US
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
