|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Scientists Baffled-New Discoveries-Darwinian Evolution Crumbling-Scientists Abandon Theory
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Spur-Man |
|
Post Content
|
They've gotten blind radiocarbon dating results for several samples of dinosaur remains now and those dates all come in a range of 20K - 40K years in the past. That translates roughly into a planet which is somewhere between a few hundred thousand and a few million years old, but almost certainly less than ten million. And it means that the theory of evolution is a total crock of shit.
*********************************************************
Quoting: Icebear Radiocarbon dating is only accurate for samples 50,000 years or younger. Even if dinosaurs are that young, it doesn't tell you how old the planet is. I won't bother refuting your usual copy/pasted spiel again, it's wrong from the first sentence. Proof, especially in mathematics is objective. The fact that any of those remains radiocarbon date at all says they are under 65k years regardless of any supposed flaws in the rc dating method. Extrapolating to an age for the earth involves two simplifying assumptions which I assume to be roughly reasonable: I assume that the geologists at least have their ratios somewhere ballpark for reality and I assume that the 40K outside figure for dinosaur remains is a begin point for at least most dinosaurs. Given that you can substitute the 40k year figure into the usual little 24 hour clock model for the earths age which has dinosaurs appearing at 10:45 pm. That yields an age of roughly 700,000 tears; if you multiply that by ten to give the evolosers every possible shot, you're still talking about less than ten million years. That's the problem, you assume.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
