Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,362 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 818,139
Pageviews Today: 1,413,899Threads Today: 796Posts Today: 13,854
10:48 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Notes from the Second Earth: "The Greatest Story Never Told" The End of Deception (page 33)
Poster Handle Taom
Post Content
NASA has used up approxiamtely $1.32 trillion USD in its 60-year history (about $22 billion per yar)

Yet, somehow they don't have anyone or any software to process raw images?

It conveniently shifts responsibility (perhaps legal responsibility) for passing off fake images as real.

When you think of Jupiter, do you think about their raw image of Jupiter or the colorful one with the bright red spot? That was CGI.

Here's a release from their website: [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Their description of the image:

The image was taken on Oct. 24, 2017 at 11:11 a.m. PDT (2:11 p.m. EDT), as Juno performed its ninth close flyby of Jupiter. At the time the image was taken, the spacecraft was 20,577 miles (33,115 kilometers) from the tops of the clouds of the planet at a latitude of minus 52.96 degrees. The spatial scale in this image is 13.86 miles/pixel (22.3 kilometers/pixel).

Citizen scientists Gerald Eichstädt and Seán Doran processed this image using data from the JunoCam imager.


They don't say it's CGI. They don't tell you that the image was not actually taken by the Juno craft and that it looks more like [link to d2xkkdgjnsfvb0.cloudfront.net (secure)]

If they can put up a CGI image on their own Instagram and not say it's CGI or even imply it's CGI, then might they do the same with video?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP