Notes from the Second Earth: "The Greatest Story Never Told" The End of Deception (page 33)

Side notes?? On my points? Women used to just be quiet.

Being on point is a thing..

Although i did also learn from the side table

My spies keep me up to date.

But do I know you under any other username?

I thought I was seated at the discussion table! ;)

Spies, huh?

Always an ac till recently.

Maybe!?!?!?!

test

No, that was what is known in the industry as an assumption. ;) ;)

Do you talk about this on any other platforms? If not you might be new to me. If so Hi, I'm Lk. Playground Shit Stirrer and Genius.

Message came through.

Oh, I was just thinking side notes belonged with side tables.

It was either that or posting, "I just made hot chocolate, ask me a question!"

In regards to the never-ending space deception, I just found someone who appears to be a CGI designer for NASA and the European Space Agency.

On his YouTube uploads page he has what looks like his CGI work: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

His CGI is good. Very good, as you can see in this video:



Just scroll down his video list and you'll find some pretty interesting stuff. All CGI.

One video is supposedly a video of the MS-10 rocket launch from space, and is the same video used on the European Space Agency's channel.

Supposedly, it is "made from 2,050 individual time-lapse photographs". NASA says about the freelancers it uses to process the images: "raw images returned are processed by citizens with a passion for space exploration"



The 'rocket' appears at 1m36s screen bottom left. It's spectacular CGI, though the stars were obviously really difficult to get right.

This one he describes as "Curiosity climbs Vera Rubin Ridge".



Again. All CGI.

Here's one titled, "ISS Earth Orbit in real time"



There is one titled "All Alone in the Night - Time-lapse footage of the Earth as seen from the ISS" from another 'creator' with 18M views.

For images, supposedly NASA gives them a raw image like this one: [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

Then the "citizen processors" return this image: [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

These are the "NASA images" you see on websites and news articles

This particular 'citizen' turned it into a movie:



To recap:

-Motion graphics designer takes blurry, indistinct images and transforms them into Jupiter, which NASA then passes off as actual images on their Instagram [link to www.instagram.com (secure)]
(Notice that in their long description they fail to mention it is CGI)

-Motion graphics designer then admits to using 2,000 raw images for a 6-minute, 4K video (making for greater than 90% CGI.. or perhaps even 100%)

-Same motion graphics designer releases tons of very convincing CGI movies of 'Earth from Space', some of which appear to be 'taken from the ISS'

When you search for 'Earth from the ISS" on YouTube you will get results of CGI videos passed off as the real thing.

NASA has used up approxiamtely $1.32 trillion USD in its 60-year history (about $22 billion per yar)

Yet, somehow they don't have anyone or any software to process raw images?

It conveniently shifts responsibility (perhaps legal responsibility) for passing off fake images as real.

When you think of Jupiter, do you think about their raw image of Jupiter or the colorful one with the bright red spot? That was CGI.

Here's a release from their website: [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Their description of the image:

The image was taken on Oct. 24, 2017 at 11:11 a.m. PDT (2:11 p.m. EDT), as Juno performed its ninth close flyby of Jupiter. At the time the image was taken, the spacecraft was 20,577 miles (33,115 kilometers) from the tops of the clouds of the planet at a latitude of minus 52.96 degrees. The spatial scale in this image is 13.86 miles/pixel (22.3 kilometers/pixel).

Citizen scientists Gerald Eichstädt and Seán Doran processed this image using data from the JunoCam imager.

They don't say it's CGI. They don't tell you that the image was not actually taken by the Juno craft and that it looks more like [link to d2xkkdgjnsfvb0.cloudfront.net (secure)]

If they can put up a CGI image on their own Instagram and not say it's CGI or even imply it's CGI, then might they do the same with video?

The 'fish eye' lens effect.

As you can see from the following video, the camera's fish-eye lens makes the Earth look concave, convex, and also flat, depending on whether the center of the image is below the horizon.

From minute 1:00 to 2:00



So, what does Earth look like without this type of lens?



NASA is known to tint images "from Mars" to from blue to brown. (This might be because they film on Earth)

Why would they not distort an image or video of the Earth to make it look more round than it is?

An explanation for how these lenses work

;)

Nice to "meet" you...;)

Last Edited by Lady of Stars on 12/12/2018 11:06 AM

@ Taom

What does all this mean to you?

Fish eye lenses, CGI, Flat Earth...

Where is this leading? and what's the point? Why are they perpetrating these deceptions?

And, what can we do about it?

Some interesting parallels to an 'Upper Earth' could be in myths of 'Shambala' or 'Agartha' or other legends

In order to dismantle the deception and move beyond it, we need a logical narrative.

This is part of the logical narrative.


It's explained on the website :)

...to distance people from 'the truth' so that they remain in power, basically.


Continue opening our eyes, seeing with new perspectives.

Baby steps.

These are the steps.

Do you foresee the totality of where this leads?

Say we break the programming. See more of the ‘truth’ than we see now, what then?

Where does the final step lead? To a completely new orbit for those who see?

To realize more of who and what we really are.

As we probably all ways do (and 'have done')

Continuing a natural cycle. There would be no final step.

What kind? And how warm makes it hot?

It would seem that they have 'sensed a disturbance in the force'.

Thread: antarctica dry valleys

Too bad they're on the wrong side.

They cannot run from what they cannot see.

All their resources mean nothing now.

Yes Yes, Of Course.

Have you seen me? Lol. I'm incredible.

What are you saying Lady Of The Stars? Are you a confident person?

Are you hot to the idea of a flar earth? Or are you a curvy round kinda star? ;)

The agents of Chaos might be "kings" of the 3rd and 4th dimension.

But the King of all dimensions is back.

[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

The nastiest, most bitter and pure hot chocolate you've ever had.

It will make you scream "sugar!" to satiate your chaos molecules.

Glad to have a front seat to be following along.

I'm totally down for an expedition or a high altitude balloon launches from the bottom of South America. My current narratives dictates that in a few years I will have a 7 figure salary and ample free time. If there is a conspiracy, I will surely find a way to reclaim my personal power.


That said, apart from you some how always being one step ahead of me in metaphysical understanding, the manifestation aspect remains lacking.


Number of classic cars owned? 0
Number of Fenn treasures/lottos won? 0
"Last Thread" promises kept? 0


Extraordinary claim require extraordinary evidence. Don't get lazy on me, either we are mapping out this narrative or we aren't, time for some big moves.



Any thoughts on finding a way to Shambhala?

I’m sure you are incredible.

Flat earth makes me a little uncomfortable. That’s the point though, right?!

I’m a light star. Pure light. Focus hard or you might miss me. ;)

Interesting.

4 The first time in 6 months of hardcore dieting I added sugar to my oats today.

Oh lord...

Enjoy the Drank!