Notes from the Second Earth: "The Greatest Story Never Told" The End of Deception (page 33)

Next year, they will wear tights and constantly touch each other on their butts.

Oh, wait.

It reminds me of the website that people think is an alternative to Reddit and a free speech haven.

From our current perspective, it would probably be seen as a well-organized society where nothing much happens and no 'progress' is made.

I suppose we would consider it an 'uncivilized' society.

We'd be bored out of our minds without a balance of Chaos.

I suppose that might be the 'chaos' that the other Earth has chosen, but perhaps now they realize the effects that androgyny has on population growth. It would be interesting to find out what's going on.


Indeed. They all ready accept our ways (that they see as evil). We just have yet to accept theirs (that they see as good).

Maybe they searched the entire population on both planets for the craziest person they could find and could only find me lol

But, yes, a crazy and counter-intuitive solution might be needed for the never-ending battle between 'good' and 'evil'

Please send a self-addressed, stamped envelope with three pounds to:

Her Majesty the King of England
c/o Buckinghalal Palace roundabout guard tower (no. 3)
London MF6A 6A6
United Kingddom

Perhaps, to acknowledge that we desire to be deceived.

Of course, we can say that we do not want to be deceived. But those are not shown in the choices that we make as humans.

We are, really, fooling ourselves.

"Facebook is evil, let's talk on Instagram!"

"Google is evil. I'm changing to DuckDuckGo."

"Starbucks is evil. I'm making my own coffee at home."

"The NFL is evil. Let's see what's on Netflix."

The list goes on, and we rarely want to make 'local' choices because our non-local choices have changed our thinking so much that we see little benefit.

We are the ones that chose those 'evil' things in the first place. Very little was forced on us.

And that is why the 'evil' is first in our own perspective. The people that we see doing it are also in our perspective and do it because we have accepted it as part of our society.

wow.. thanks to all of you!

Anything begins as a seed, so to speak. How much attention it gets depends on our thoughts and actions.

Radically different things still relate to everything else. Otherwise it would not exist at the same time, nor be seen as being radically different.

'Waking up' I suppose is the best analogy. Once you wake up and see how you've been looking at things the whole time, it's hard to go back to sleep.

Yes. Think of it like fear. As humans, we 'fear evil' but continue to choose evil.

The fear keeps us focused on it, bringing it more into our perspective. It's not magic, of course. When we focus on something we are more likely to interpret future things in the same way.

"When you've got a hammer, everything becomes a nail"

We don't realize that, for example, if we were Mark Zuckerberg and had his experiences we would make the same choices that he had made. We'd have the same website and service, and would be 'violating' users in the same way and would appear just as robotic.

We're trying to see everything as though everything has our perspective, not realizing that everything is in our perspective.

We see 'bad' things but fail to understand that they're not actually bad (or good), but are different parts of our own perspective. Things are nothing-in-particular until we interpret them.

Yes. At first, I was myself resisting the concept. I didn't really know what "love your enemies" meant when I asked Maria why she was talking to me. But now it makes a lot more sense when I re-member the chaos and evil in my own self.

When I first realized this personally, it was when I thought about all the actors who weren't just acting on-screen but all the time, from birth or childhood to their (real or fake) deaths. We think the 'Oscars' are a celebration of acting achievement (or an idolized tribute to Satan) but the acting is the world stage. They win for their ability to deceive on multiple levels, and we have no idea what's going on because we generally don't want to accept the reality. Nobel Prizes are an other example.

We think of this 'evil' as evil, which allows it to continue. We think we are against it, but it still goes on. So, are we really against it? Certainly, we are against slavery, for example. But do we really care about the 20+ million slaves that we heard are around the world right now? No, we prefer to focus on other non-local deceptions that are served to us, and whatever other nonsense fills the airwaves. We might spend 50x more time watching fictional characters develop on a television program rather than an 'evil' that is happening to our own kind.

We ignore it, so it continues. So, how 'good' are we, really?

From 2017:


I think for 'free will' you can choose from among your entire perspective. Yet, you will experience that which is most relative.

Something you 'want' could require a lot of interactions (energy) to experience it, so there's that limitation.

By, 'Let each be themselves, and we exercise our 'free will' to choose the path we want.' I mean, for example:

Now
Thing #1 pretends it is 'good' and beneficial when it is actually harmful
Thing #2 might be beneficial but is not promoted and no one knows about it

Then
Thing #1 comes out as evil and illustrates its degeneracy in a more open way. It knows it can be harmful but, like alcohol, people still choose it for their own reasons.
Thing #2 is more known because thing #1 no longer needs to deceive

Then it is up to each person to choose their own path, rather than being tricked into making a choice. People will need to learn how they can be deceived, and learn the ways in which the agents of chaos communicate their deception.

Each 'side' gets more devout followers. The Chaos side works to attract more people, while the Order side has less people but stronger relationships.

There's no need to produce it, as they are in abundance in the evening. I don't know if they can be stored, though. But perhaps if they are needed with some technology the technology would have been just used at night.

The temples of the body were mostly meeting places where people could gather (inside and out). The 'recharge' part was quite simple, meant to re-align molecular structure after emotional distress, ill health, a stressful day, etc. Stretching does the same thing, in a way, but chemically. This would have been electromagnetically, similar to putting epsom salts in a warm bath.

Most ancient structures, from what I see, were not high-tech. High tech was certainly known about and possible, but the people didn't care for it. It was an undeveloped as mental technology is today, something which we could easily do but choose not to focus on.

An 'advanced' human civilization would not focus on physical technology, but mental and emotional. We believe that it would because that's what Chaos wants us to believe, thinking that 'high tech' is good and is progress (when the opposite is so).

This is cyclic, so it's based on an assumption that the cycle hasn't stopped. (Cyclic in terms of a process, not years, though.)

Church = Religion
State = Science

They are not really separated today, just in appearances. The State uses 'the science of managing populations', otherwise known as politics, but it uses the same principles as religion. (That might be why there was a less apparent separation between the two in past.)

Last Edited by The Builder on 02/05/2019 05:34 AM

Perhaps even smaller numbers determine the fate of the 9 billion.

Even with one, much can be changed.

You could be making it as we speak!

Curious. Would you say that your interpretation of things is pre-ordained?

I see.

Outside of what?

But we all ready know those new ways, don't we?

Those are actually the old ways that we have replaced with the 'new' ways.

Could we really move in a different direction without some destruction? It's interesting to consider.

From here:


Rather than darkness being better, our concept of 'good' and 'bad' is inverted (like so much else).

It might be a hard pill to swallow but much of the 'love and light' material of the 80's and 90's was a psyop from the agents of chaos.

Satan is the 'lord of light' and all that.

More Chaos = more light. Think of how fast atoms would need to move around to produce more light. That's chaos at work.

The Void is darkness. It is nothing-in-particular. It is silence and the Absolute.

We are not secure with this kind of being (or non-being), so that's where Chaos comes in. It makes our existence exciting, but the meaning is all ways the darkness of the Void from whence we come.

Even Christianity has been perverted in this way, with KRSNA (Kristna) meaning 'black'. Basically, the 'law of the void' was changed to 'the law of the light' (Satanic worship).

"Black" (the void) used to be worshipped. Now it's considered 'evil'. That's the work of the agents of chaos, distorting reality.

Yes, we rely on the Sun. We rely on Chaos for our existence, of course. But Order is at our core. Both are needed.


An absence of any major force can encourage depression. It can also encourage happiness. But what kind of 'light' is needed? Are blind people depressed, for example? I suppose it depends on the way our society is structured and how we interpret things.

We are led to believe that the sun is essential for life on Earth. Personally, I do not believe that is true (though I have not seen anything in the metaphysical world about it). That is because the 'energy' that organic life relies on (calvin cycle, photosynthesis, heat, etc.) I think can come from other places, not just the sun. I think the energy is natural to the atmosphere, and the 'night time energy' is just as important.

Would we all die if there was a supervolcano that blocked out the sun completely for a few years? Probably not, and there is evidence to suggest it has happened more than once in the past 50,000 years or so. We are still here.

Last Edited by The Builder on 02/04/2019 10:51 PM

Perhaps there are neither particles nor waves.

But, if we had the appropriate instruments, such could be interpreted. In that way, a particle would always exhibit wave-like qualities, and vice versa. (That is to say, a photon would be less-particle-more-wave or move-wave-less-particle.)

Thanks for the video :)

Does thinking require the psychoanalyses of Sigmund Freud? Perhaps not.

It would seem that 'quantum mechanics' just wants to insert itself into consciousness. They're all ways on the lookout for more funding, so why not? :)

I wonder if the agents of chaos have a school that teaches 'magic' hand gestures? It would certainly be interesting!

The old maps are nice to look at. There was a time, though, that all of Antarctica was called 'Australis'.

If I wanted to access to information in the metaphysical way you do?, What would you suggest?

Curious... what would be the first thing you would try to find out?

Something I find interesting is how far VR is coming along, and to think of what that will be like in the future.

But very few have been taught about lucid dreaming, and how it makes Current VR (which is fairly impressive) look like a child’s toy.

VR will still be controlled / limited by those who have the knowledge to create them, and the experiences will be shaped by them. And ofc need constant investment in both time and money for those who use it.

Lucid dreaming on the other had can engage all the senses, is free, and can be done every night in current “wasted” time. And be far more personal and exciting (surprising) than something some else can dream up for us.

What other mental technology do you think there is?

Yes. And nobody makes a profit with lucid dreaming... yet.

Are we be better off as a society with the profit motives of yoga teachers? Probably. The spread of yoga to the average person can mostly be attributed to them, I think. It's not the original yoga, but it's better than nothing.

That would be 'physical technology'.

It could be the same for mental and emotional technology. When profit can be found, the effectiveness of marketing persuasion and propaganda can help spread awareness. The same factors that help spread it contribute to its perversion and demise, though.

People aren't just going to waltz into things like this. They would need to be told by media and other authorities to do it.

It would be nice if we lived in a different kind of world where we did things for the sake of exploration or because of their benefits, but that's not the world we live in for now.


Anything that can be imagined, really.

Personally, I prefer the 'neuronics' approach where I use my own alphabet as a type of natural language-based virtual computer. (The language here being thoughts.)

It's much easier than might be assumed, I think. The hard part is realizing that you're looking at a room full of real gold rather than polished bronze.

We've made some attempts at explaining this but perhaps the language and concepts are not there yet.

OP you stated earlier that 'a part of us' keeps on returning things that we push away back to us until we recognise that what we are pushing away is actually a part of us. And that once we accept this/that then it no longer has a need to return to us. And then once we've no longer any forces working against us we become a better part of ourselves. This suggests to me that there is a part of us that is striving for perfection and by using your method we can achieve this. Am I right?

I've adopted this method of yours in my everyday life and I'm recognising my self in others, good and bad. There has been some pleasantly surprising effects so far. So thank you for your advice.


You said that you are the King of Chaos and that you intend to bring down the AOCs with a method which will first be adopted by a '100th monkey' and then by many others. Is the aforementioned method the thing that will change the world? Or is it something else?

How do they see our ways as evil?

What does accepting their evil, look like?

LOL

We should be seeking balance and not battles, right? Battling feels like wasted energy.