Fox News: Judge Napolitano says "We learned today that prosecutors have evidence that the President of the United States committed a felony"

LOL

Again with the stripper.

From the Prosecutors Point Of View, it may appear to them its evidence, but is it really ? They can also fabricate it to look as though its evidence.

So, we have hard evidence that Oblahblah and company committed multiple felonies. They even acknowledged same by paying the largest fine in US history (for doing much worse, and that assumes the President actually directed the use of campaign funds to pay off horse face).

So, we now have an acknowledged liar testifying that is what happened (which is the “evidence”) while facing countless other charges that would otherwise put him in prison for life. Hmmmmm...

Last Edited by SaveUSa on 12/13/2018 09:38 AM

Judge Nap was reading the charge. The main point being overlooked is that Trump used personal money and not campaign funds! Ergo Not Illegal!

that little traitorous cunt obviously didn't do his homework on Hitlery and Osuckbag

He said the same thing about Obama and Hillary, numerous times and we see where that went....


.

Last Edited by ~kpm~ on 12/13/2018 09:42 AM

Of course this is BS, but the deep state will move to indict President Trump for the BS charges, and they will not wait until he is out of office.

They have no choice because their time is almost up. They know Trump is moving to expose them.

If the deep state doesn't try anything they can now, it will be too late for them.

So buckle up. This is it. The fate of our nation and civilization gets decided in the next 2 years.

Well you can tell the judge has flipped and is now a Lefty as he is talking so much shit.

So last week, Tucker Carlson said that Trump was incapable of being president, has no fundamental understanding of how the system works and has not kept his promises.

This week Andrew Napolitano says that there is evidence that Trump committed a felony.

What's up with Fox News?

Judge Napolitano's Cheese has slipped off his Cracker.


" I order you" when words become Felonies.

BINGO!

Trump has a long history of paying people out of his own pocket to say or not say stuff, do or not do stuff. Just like all people with big money do.

Even if Trump ordered Cohen to pay the stripper to be silent, that's not a campaign finance crime if the Trump private funding streams were used. Only if the account where campaign money was keep, and there is hard evidence that Trump ordered Cohen to use campaign funds, were used to silence a critic is there a felony.

Judge Napolitano does not report news. He has become biased against Trump. He should leave Fox News and look for job with CNN or MSNBC.

They have always said that Trump knows nothing about how government and the political process works.

Now they are saying he knew exactly what he was doing, and he knew he was breaking the law, by ordering his attorney to pay these two women. And, they are saying they know that his intent was to do this to help his campaign and NOT to save his family any embarrassment.

Their whole argument is based on several guesses. Many other people have done similar and received a slap on the wrist to nothing.

Is this the new user id you are going to be using instead of the Fifth and a Half Element?

You really keep busy switching between different logins.

OK, the bottom line...

Cohen pleaded guilty to two counts of criminality that doesn't exist anywhere in the Campaign Finance Law or criminal statues.

Why would he do this? I assume it may be because Mueller said if he pleaded guilty to a non crime, he would not prosecute Cohen for his other fraudulent activities, and in return his sentence would be severely reduced. He probably made Cohen sign an NDA on this too. The goal was to once again make Trump look like he is guilty. And the MSM is going crazy over it.

Trump is in the clear because a campaign expenditure under U.S. campaign finance law is explicitly defined as a expenditure “solely for campaign activity. Any supposed reimbursement Trump paid to Cohen with his own money after Cohen formed an NDA with Stormy Daniels or, any other woman whom Trump may have something embarrassing, is perfectly legal.

The key here is "Solely for Campaign Activity." If his personal reputation, business or marriage could be severely impacted. An NDA is the way to legally pay off a blackmailer.

So get over it!

Not quite.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Trump has hundreds of millions of dollars as discretionary/who gives a fuck money at his personal disposal. To throw a few hundred thousand at someone itching to defame him is no biggie. All celebrities and rich people get targeted by gold digger scum. All of them.
A truly smart guy like Trump would never in a million years use campaign money for this garbage. Never.

why would they pay her off unless she REQUESTED to be payed off.

in other words, SHE WAS BLACKMAILING him, no doubt about it.

which is, in fact Illegal

you can't blackmail people for this sort of thing.
they do it all the famous gentiles, all the time

david letterman showed the whole world how to deal with it,


i'm a little surprised they let Letterman do this on air, as the blackmailer was a cbs executive. the network execs are mafia like this, but I think Letterman is actually sort of connected or something.

Napolitano changed a few years ago and wonder if it is simply due to him being anti-Trump or due to some change in his personal life - death of husband. Loss sometimes changes a persons beliefs.

Tucker is not against Trump but rather just speaking the truth about Trump not being capable of meeting his promises. I want to see Trump succeed but I am not going to lie to myself about reality.

Some pressure needs to be put on Trump from the supporters end that we are not simply going to approve of him being an establishment Republican and going along with the globalists/Neocons. Rather we want the platform he ran on.

Last Edited by mikerock on 12/13/2018 10:30 PM

Didn't Disney buy Fox? Fox has changed recently.

Prosecutors fake and trump up BS all the time. Why do you think most political hacks are former prosecutors.

Interesting isn't it? So the script has changed, yes.. but now you can see that there is, and was, a script they had to follow

They told that to the federal judge.\

Under the rules, they can’t tell that to the federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence.

sounds to me like whoever "THEY" is broke the rules.

Boy, ole Judge Nap is sure sore he never got a call for any judicial nomination, isn't he?

That used to be kind of a thing here.

Thread: Lets Start a Twitter Campaign to promote Judge Napolitano For the Supreme Court

Including Obama who used 2 Million dollars illegally!
His punishment... a little over 300k in fines.

The other "tell" in all of this is Cohen wasn't prosecuted on or found guilty on "campaign finance" law. He just made the statement to get them off his ass and get a lesser sentence.

The money Cohen used was reimbursed to Cohen and Cohen had a fund for stuff such as this. This was Trumps personal money, not campaign money. Therefore it couldn't be an illegal campaign contribution either.

All this media hype is them simply pushing a false narrative they want to push to harm the President. They don't have any evidence of what they claim. Right now all they have is a guy who has already been proven a liar, talking shit to get his sentence reduced.

Besides, Trump didn't direct a "lawyer" to break laws. He directed him to do his job and when you hire lawyers to do work for you, YOU EXPECT THEM TO DO IT LAWFULLY! Otherwise, why not just hire the damn MOB?

I’m sick of them!! I only watch Hannity and Gutfeld...sometimes Laura!

i always hated that neopolitan ice cream