What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings

But if you look at all the footage, the collapse of both towers start very close to the impact points.

I have read and watched various documentaries on this subject, still seems little evidence of control demolition. I think the jury is still out on this one.

Please explain to us how the three towers came down in free fall i.e no resistance. These buildings were steel framed. How were all the structural elements removed instantly to allow free fall collapse? Explosive charges seems a reasonable suggestion. Do you have a better explanation other than steel being heated and weakened by fire?

no

the jury convicted the Saud and Bush families
treason death by public hanging

but a zombie apocalypse of public stupidity allowed them to live

No, no better explanation, the heat and fire weakened the steel, therefor collapsing the buildings; seems the most logical explanation.

Why would they demolish the buildings? Look at the slow motion of the collapse, it started at the impact point, weakness by impact and fire, weight of remaining top part of structure forced the collapse.


We all saw the collapse live on the TV, I see collapse at point of weakness, no more than that..

God knows who knew or set the whole thing up...

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

thermite residue
bldg 7 not hit by anything

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2
, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4
, Frank M. Legge5
,
Daniel Farnsworth2
, Gregg Roberts6
, James R. Gourley7
and Bradley R. Larsen3
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3
S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
4
9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5
Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7
International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA



ONLY THERMITE CAN DO WHAT HAPPENED ON 911
NO FUEL BURNS HOT ENOUGH





the hillbillies who sell the attack story are below zombie IQ


we cant afford to have ppl that stupid on board they are a threat to all mankind


HULSEY’S WTC 7 EVALUATION
The most confounding discrepancy in the events that took place on 9/11 is the collapse of World Trade Center tower number seven, or WTC 7. If there is any evidence of a more sinister, underlying plot, WTC 7 is the smoking gun. While the official story behind the collapse of the main towers is similarly suspicious, the fact that they were hit by planes lends slightly more credence to the official narrative. However, WTC 7 was never struck by a plane, instead it caught fire after the collapse of towers one and two.


“Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams,” has been an aphorism used by those who believe that the events on 9/11 were a false flag operation. It is also used pejoratively by those who believe that several steel-framed buildings fell in on themselves in Manhattan that day, due primarily to intense heat from fires, defying all historical precedence for structures of that magnitude and level of engineering.

If you think there's more to it than that plain physics, that's your opinion my Auzzie friend, but slow I am not....

Is this just distraction?

thermite residue
bldg 7 not hit by anything

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2
, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4
, Frank M. Legge5
,
Daniel Farnsworth2
, Gregg Roberts6
, James R. Gourley7
and Bradley R. Larsen3
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3
S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
4
9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5
Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7
International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA



ONLY THERMITE CAN DO WHAT HAPPENED ON 911
NO FUEL BURNS HOT ENOUGH





the hillbillies who sell the attack story are below zombie IQ


we cant afford to have ppl that stupid on board they are a threat to all mankind


HULSEY’S WTC 7 EVALUATION
The most confounding discrepancy in the events that took place on 9/11 is the collapse of World Trade Center tower number seven, or WTC 7. If there is any evidence of a more sinister, underlying plot, WTC 7 is the smoking gun. While the official story behind the collapse of the main towers is similarly suspicious, the fact that they were hit by planes lends slightly more credence to the official narrative. However, WTC 7 was never struck by a plane, instead it caught fire after the collapse of towers one and two.


“Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams,” has been an aphorism used by those who believe that the events on 9/11 were a false flag operation. It is also used pejoratively by those who believe that several steel-framed buildings fell in on themselves in Manhattan that day, due primarily to intense heat from fires, defying all historical precedence for structures of that magnitude and level of engineering.

WHAT HIT BUILDING 7 ??????????????/
NOTHING

I have read about the fuel and steel issue, I agree there is some doubt about whether jet fuel would be enough to melt the steel, but would you agree that the collapse of the towers started at the point of impact?

YOU'VE ALL SEEN THE EXPLODING CAR THAT CRASHES IN MOVIES
BUT GASOLINE ISN'T EXPLOSIVE UNLESS UNDER EXTREME PRESSURE
ALL THOSE EXPLODING HOLLYWOOD CARS ARE FOR STUPID PEOPLE
THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE PLANES CAUSED 3 BUILDINGS TO COLLAPSE STRAIGHT DOWN AND ONE OF THE 3 WASN'T EVEN HIT SO IT HAD NO JET FUEL INSIDE

THERE WEREN'T 2 TWIN TOWERS THAT COLLAPSED
THERE WERE 3 BUILDINGS
GET YOUR STUPID STORY STRAIGHT !!!!!!

i WANT THE STUPID PPL OUT OF MY LIFE/WORLD IMMEDIATELY.

I'm sorry to say that your and mine opinions are neither here or there when compared to the scientists, architects, structural engineers, fighter pilots, commercial pilots, trainers, demolition contractors, metalurgists, and a hundred other experts in their thousands who say in all events that day, something was very, very wrong.

The jury you refer to was recalled and is not out. It the was few people who could be mustered to echo state sentiment without any practical or scientific answers for the muliple issues of that day.

1/ Can you explain the velocity of WTC buildings collapse?

2/ Can you explain the uniform collapse into their own footprint without slewing to one side due to un-equal resistance.

3/ Can you explain WTC7 implosion with the center collapsing before the exterior and damaged parts of the building?

If you cannott see any evidence of demolition, why do you think the jury is still out on this one?

looks like fake airplanes (holograms) crashing into the towers at the floors that the charges are placed. charges probably placed at other strategic locations in the buildings too.
it starts with charges going off in the sub basement to weaken the center structure. then charges going off at the level where the fake plane is striking the building. eventually causing the heavy portion of the building above the explosions to collapse, and pancake down the rest of the way. that's what it looked like to me.

THOSE BUILDINGS ALL CONTAINED FINANCIAL RECORDS

LUCKY LARRY

REVELATION SAYS THE WHOLE WORLD WATCHES THE BURNING OF THE CITY THAT MADE KINGS RICH

AND CRIED

WHY ?


BECAUSE IT SIGNALS THE COMING FINAL JUDGEMENT OF EVERY LIAR AND THIEF ON EARTH

THEY HAVEN'T LOST THEIR MONEY
ITS IN DUBAI

BUT THE SIGN OF THEIR TERMINATION HAS BEEN WRITTEN

NYC WAS THE CAPITAL CITY OF USA

IT SIGNALS THE END OF MYSTERY BABYLON

THE IRRADIATION OF USA

AND OF EARTH

Knowing metal the way I do, and the amount of time it took, I say the metal structures got soft, not melted, and collapsed downward...the flow of least resistance...it would take additional energy to make them fall over. Metal gets soft when heated long before it melts.

just explain building 7 as a start

Forget about buildings 1& 2. I've never shown a video of #7 to anybody that said that was possible from the planes or from 1&2 collapse. That tells you the entire operation was planned.

Remember the iceman documentary. Once you kill one person, the jump to killing the next 1, or 5, or 3000 is easy. Once you kill one person the gate of your moral objections is forever open. People become chattel and each one has a dollar value tied to its head.

OK....you tell me how the uber fragile aluminum wing tips of the plane cut threw 1/2" thick stainless steal boxes filled with cement.

EVEN AT 1000 MPH an equal thickness of stainless steal will destroy aluminum when met head on....so how did aluminum less than 1/16" thick cut threw the 1/2" thick BOXED stainless steal????

Last Edited by Not in my mind on 12/23/2018 08:29 AM

Sorry but that explanation is totally illogical. It is not for me to explain why the buildings were demolished.If you are to accept the official narrative then you need to explain how three steel framed buildings fell at free fall into their own footprint with no resistance. You have chosen to ignore this. A weakened structure does not explain how all structural elements were instantly removed.

Zombies were in there eating the steel.

It may be much bigger than you think. 9/11 truthers are simply not paranoid enough:

[link to theplanforthefuture.org (secure)]

"A BBC Scotland article from 5 April 2001 was headlined ‘Twin towers to be demolished’."

"On 11 September 2001 a British television reporter for BBC reported that World Trade Center building seven had collapsed 26 minutes before it happened."

Last Edited by niphtrique on 12/23/2018 08:42 AM

Asbestos was the biggest problem so demolition had been ruled out.....Silverstein leased the Towers knowing full well they needed to have ALL of the asbestos safely removed and it was going to cost him a fortune and take years....or would it?



Last Edited by Not in my mind on 12/23/2018 08:50 AM

I know a little about metal as well and how it reacts to force. WTC7 was designed to house a Con Ed electrical substation at one end. The steel framing at that end of the building was completely different than the framing at the other end, because a large open space was needed for the transformers and switchgear inside.

Due to the difference in the structure of the building from one end to the other, there is no way it would have dropped straight down if the collapse was caused by fire. It would have topped over one way or the other.

Of course they were.


But the truth will never eradicate the popular mythology.




And mud they had for mortar...


The truth does not always win out.


Not in this world.



But there is another.


There is no perfect justice in this world.

"A zombie apocalypse of public stupidity." Truer words were never spoken.