Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 625 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 83,683
Pageviews Today: 146,005Threads Today: 100Posts Today: 1,239
03:01 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77248045
United States
01/02/2019 07:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
This is good:

So there's a race between America and Russia to get to the moon. America supposedly gets their first and Russia throws up their hands and says fuck it. No reason to go now. LOL


===

So once a country wins the moon, how do they enforce their domain there? Send up troops?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


Who says they have domain? International treaty prevents claiming of the Moon. Another basic thing you should already know.
 Quoting: LHP598


Apparently, after their success, they've stopped going to the moon. When will they go again? Ever? :alientransformat:

Can we view the trash that was left behind with a telescope? (the base of apollo, that it blasted off from?)
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/02/2019 07:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Another view found here
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
which also has a 3 frame animated gif
 Quoting: LHP598


So it's called the SEQ Bay.

Did that have the amazing cameras, microphones, and super transmitter that beamed video and sound back to earth in real time?
The transmitter and antenna needed to transmit video and sounds back to earth (!) - wouldn't they be too big and heavy to bring along on a space trip? Back then, that powerful of a transmitter must have been huge!
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


well, they had transistors and and basic integrated circuits.

so, they could get it all into a bread box.
 Quoting: Colloidal Peanut Butter


Is there a photo of the transmitter and battery that they took to the moon available to view?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.

Here's a photo of the dish antenna: where did they store it in apollo? Did it fold up?
[link to www.ab9il.net (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?

Here's apollo's camera: Is this the camera that stayed on the moon? Is it the one that tracked followed Apollo as it blasted off from the moon?
[link to upload.wikimedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon. rolleyes
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77248045
United States
01/02/2019 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


So it's called the SEQ Bay.

Did that have the amazing cameras, microphones, and super transmitter that beamed video and sound back to earth in real time?
The transmitter and antenna needed to transmit video and sounds back to earth (!) - wouldn't they be too big and heavy to bring along on a space trip? Back then, that powerful of a transmitter must have been huge!
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


well, they had transistors and and basic integrated circuits.

so, they could get it all into a bread box.
 Quoting: Colloidal Peanut Butter


Is there a photo of the transmitter and battery that they took to the moon available to view?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.

Here's a photo of the dish antenna: where did they store it in apollo? Did it fold up?
[link to www.ab9il.net (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?

Here's apollo's camera: Is this the camera that stayed on the moon? Is it the one that tracked followed Apollo as it blasted off from the moon?
[link to upload.wikimedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon. rolleyes
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?
 Quoting: LHP598


Seems there's a video showing apollo blasting off from the moon, and the camera follows apollo as it goes up. Were there robotics that moved the camera, to follow apollo as it blasted into the moon's atmosphere?
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/02/2019 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
This is good:

So there's a race between America and Russia to get to the moon. America supposedly gets their first and Russia throws up their hands and says fuck it. No reason to go now. LOL


===

So once a country wins the moon, how do they enforce their domain there? Send up troops?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


Who says they have domain? International treaty prevents claiming of the Moon. Another basic thing you should already know.
 Quoting: LHP598


Apparently, after their success, they've stopped going to the moon. When will they go again? Ever?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Ask Congress. They are the ones that cut funding to the Apollo program while it was still in progress. They are the ones that control the budget.

Can we view the trash that was left behind with a telescope? (the base of apollo, that it blasted off from?)
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


Do you have a telescope with a mirror a few hundred feet across? That is the only way you'll view it from Earth. The Dawes' limit shows that
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
The stuff left behind has been imaged from lunar orbit.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/02/2019 08:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


well, they had transistors and and basic integrated circuits.

so, they could get it all into a bread box.
 Quoting: Colloidal Peanut Butter


Is there a photo of the transmitter and battery that they took to the moon available to view?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.

Here's a photo of the dish antenna: where did they store it in apollo? Did it fold up?
[link to www.ab9il.net (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?

Here's apollo's camera: Is this the camera that stayed on the moon? Is it the one that tracked followed Apollo as it blasted off from the moon?
[link to upload.wikimedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon. rolleyes
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?
 Quoting: LHP598


Seems there's a video showing apollo blasting off from the moon, and the camera follows apollo as it goes up. Were there robotics that moved the camera, to follow apollo as it blasted into the moon's atmosphere?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


It was remotely controlled from Houston by Ed Fendell, the same guy that controlled it during the EVAs previously.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77248045
United States
01/02/2019 08:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


Is there a photo of the transmitter and battery that they took to the moon available to view?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.

Here's a photo of the dish antenna: where did they store it in apollo? Did it fold up?
[link to www.ab9il.net (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?

Here's apollo's camera: Is this the camera that stayed on the moon? Is it the one that tracked followed Apollo as it blasted off from the moon?
[link to upload.wikimedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon. rolleyes
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?
 Quoting: LHP598


Seems there's a video showing apollo blasting off from the moon, and the camera follows apollo as it goes up. Were there robotics that moved the camera, to follow apollo as it blasted into the moon's atmosphere?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


It was remotely controlled from Houston by Ed Fendell, the same guy that controlled it during the EVAs previously.
 Quoting: LHP598


It must be a LONG ways to the moon from the earth. Apollo must have been going FAST. How did they survive?

All these things that you know about going to the moon - how do you know what you researched wasn't fiction or faked to begin with? What if they fed you a detailed line of bull?

I gotta get off this forum for tonight. See you tomorrow!
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/02/2019 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.

...

Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?

...

Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon. rolleyes
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?
 Quoting: LHP598


Seems there's a video showing apollo blasting off from the moon, and the camera follows apollo as it goes up. Were there robotics that moved the camera, to follow apollo as it blasted into the moon's atmosphere?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


It was remotely controlled from Houston by Ed Fendell, the same guy that controlled it during the EVAs previously.
 Quoting: LHP598


It must be a LONG ways to the moon from the earth. Apollo must have been going FAST. How did they survive?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

How would they not? There is no speed more dangerous than another. It is acceleration that is dangerous in high amounts. How can you not even know the distance to the Moon? Have you done ANY research at all?

All these things that you know about going to the moon - how do you know what you researched wasn't fiction or faked to begin with? What if they fed you a detailed line of bull?
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

Multiple sources agreeing with each tends to hold more weight then hoaxies that can't come up with a claim that stands up to scrutiny in 40 years and often make claims that show they don't even understand basic science.

I gotta get off this forum for tonight. See you tomorrow!
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk

So you can gish gallop some more? You mentioned in another thread you think the moon is a hologram. And it is clear your research skills are nonexistent. Perhaps you should read before you throw out more baseless claims.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
hillbilly

User ID: 75829441
United States
01/02/2019 08:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
But they couldn't get there because they couldn't get their heavy lifting rocket, the N-1, to work.
 Quoting: LHP598
Their heavy-lift anti-grav Cosmospheres with DEWs ruled by the time our space planes were ready in the 80's.

Last Edited by hillbilly on 01/02/2019 08:47 PM
Water is the only drink for a wise man.
Call me a pot but heat me not.-Putin
Silence is where God speaks. Anything else is but a poor translation. -Rumi
Wanna hear God laugh? Just talk about your plans.
An old broom knows all the corners.
Slow is steady; steady is smooth; smooth is fast.
Success has a thousand fathers but failure only one son.
The deeper that sorrow carves into your being, the more joy you can contain.-Gibran
Drone#6

User ID: 77248107
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 06:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL


 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


This is an interesting video.

1. Go to 1:30 in it.
2. Then look at the picture - spot anything missing?

What is missing is The Moon. Where has it gone? If the moon was a 50 yard cube I'd accept that picture, but it's a great big thing, bigger even than a football field. So why can't we see it?
 Quoting: Drone#6


Yeah, why is it totally smooth in at 1:30, but earlier we see detailed craters, etc? I guess that is weird unless there was a sand dune on the moon looking the other direction.

The only way to know is for one of us GLPers to personally go to the moon, and come back and tell us as a witness. Then we could believe.
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


different angle and lighting. craters are less visible in the part at 1:30 as the light is from behind the camera and we don't see the shadowed part of the crater.
 Quoting: LHP598


Different lighting?
How? did they screw a different sun in?
Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space?
billetman

User ID: 75364480
United States
01/03/2019 06:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
How did they go to the Moon 50 years ago? Try reading up on it, it's all out there, to whatever level of detail you desire...
 Quoting: hotdogg

Just check the telemetry data. Oh wait, NASA lost it. My bad.
MogwaiHunter

User ID: 74501514
United States
01/03/2019 07:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
The moon is a giant antennae and if you could see the back you would see the concave part with the antennae pointing out the center. That is why MTV made the VMA award in the shape of a moon man. lol ;)
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


This is an interesting video.

1. Go to 1:30 in it.
2. Then look at the picture - spot anything missing?

What is missing is The Moon. Where has it gone? If the moon was a 50 yard cube I'd accept that picture, but it's a great big thing, bigger even than a football field. So why can't we see it?
 Quoting: Drone#6


Yeah, why is it totally smooth in at 1:30, but earlier we see detailed craters, etc? I guess that is weird unless there was a sand dune on the moon looking the other direction.

The only way to know is for one of us GLPers to personally go to the moon, and come back and tell us as a witness. Then we could believe.
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


different angle and lighting. craters are less visible in the part at 1:30 as the light is from behind the camera and we don't see the shadowed part of the crater.
 Quoting: LHP598


Different lighting?
How? did they screw a different sun in?
Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space?
 Quoting: Drone#6


Learn to read. I explained it in the post that the sun is from a different direction. The camera has been moved between the two different shots being discussed.

Last Edited by LHP598 on 01/03/2019 08:11 AM
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Trey_is_Wilson

User ID: 76131739
United States
01/03/2019 08:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
The temp on the moon ranges from -280 to +220...

How did those suits regulate their temperature without emitting any vapor?
rosicrucian1

User ID: 76960994
Canada
01/03/2019 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Yawn the Koran is always right.
“the devil is a foe to the blood” Prof. Minor
graff2

User ID: 75758325
United States
01/03/2019 08:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
UPDATE: Since I never expected the response to my original post about the Chinese Moon Rover to be so great, and the topic naturally turned to the alarming facts arising of whether the Apollo mission in the summer of 1969 was a "hoax" or not, I decided to re-head this thread with an actual, OFFICIAL N.A.S.A. ("Never.A.Straight.Answer") VIDEO which PROVES we never went to the moon. Their project "Orion" to Mars with humans aboard will 'have to solve the problems of the Van Allen Belts..before we can send humans to Mars'...

How the F did they go to the friggin MOON almost 50 yrs ago then?








===============================================














ORIGINAL POST:

The horizon line and the smaller curvature of the moon is well defined, MUCH different than any of the apollo mission photos, which they couldn't fake on a soundstage with fake backdrop photos.

Here's just one photo:

[link to www.forbes.com (secure)]

WE MIGHT HAVE GONE TO THE MOON ALREADY, JUST NOT VIA APOLLO MISSIONS, WHICH WERE P.R. STUNTS.






hiding
 Quoting: Truth 1818


When confronted with questions about how they got to the Moon, NASA informs everybody that 'we don't have that technology anymore'

Last Edited by graff2 on 01/03/2019 08:52 AM
SiTeS a sNaRe, sPiTEful & bArE


Safety Disclaimer: Nothing I've ever said on this profile or any profile ever connected to or in communication with this profile or IP address, or any IP address affiliated with this profile or IP address, is meant to be construed as fact. Everything I say or appear to suggest is 100% satire or only meant for entertainment purposes. I dont believe anything I ever say here because it's all a joke and should all be considered as such. Assuming anything I've ever said is true or meant to be education, or anything any account ever, in any way whatsoever, remotely associated with this account or IP address is true or meant to be educational, would result in you assuming something on your own accord knowing what you are assuming is not based on fact. Every communication to and from this account is satire and/or entertainment only, always.
Drone#6

User ID: 77248107
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 09:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


Yeah, why is it totally smooth in at 1:30, but earlier we see detailed craters, etc? I guess that is weird unless there was a sand dune on the moon looking the other direction.

The only way to know is for one of us GLPers to personally go to the moon, and come back and tell us as a witness. Then we could believe.
 Quoting: BremertonHardcorePunk


different angle and lighting. craters are less visible in the part at 1:30 as the light is from behind the camera and we don't see the shadowed part of the crater.
 Quoting: LHP598


Different lighting?
How? did they screw a different sun in?
Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space?
 Quoting: Drone#6


Learn to read. I explained it in the post that the sun is from a different direction. The camera has been moved between the two different shots being discussed.
 Quoting: LHP598


Actually you said 'different angle and lighting'.
The photo may be from a different angle but the lighting must the same, even between the beginning and end of the mission the suns angle didn't change that much.

But hey, can you explain what angle of the sun will cause the nearby ground to be clearly lit but the other few million hectares and horizon to completely disappear?
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
The temp on the moon ranges from -280 to +220...

How did those suits regulate their temperature without emitting any vapor?
 Quoting: Trey_is_Wilson


the temperature of the surface is in those ranges. A vacuum has no temperature. And it takes time for the surface to heat up to max and cool down to min. they landed in lunar morning so it was at neither of those extremes when they were there.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
UPDATE: Since I never expected the response to my original post about the Chinese Moon Rover to be so great, and the topic naturally turned to the alarming facts arising of whether the Apollo mission in the summer of 1969 was a "hoax" or not, I decided to re-head this thread with an actual, OFFICIAL N.A.S.A. ("Never.A.Straight.Answer") VIDEO which PROVES we never went to the moon. Their project "Orion" to Mars with humans aboard will 'have to solve the problems of the Van Allen Belts..before we can send humans to Mars'...

How the F did they go to the friggin MOON almost 50 yrs ago then?








===============================================














ORIGINAL POST:

The horizon line and the smaller curvature of the moon is well defined, MUCH different than any of the apollo mission photos, which they couldn't fake on a soundstage with fake backdrop photos.

Here's just one photo:

[link to www.forbes.com (secure)]

WE MIGHT HAVE GONE TO THE MOON ALREADY, JUST NOT VIA APOLLO MISSIONS, WHICH WERE P.R. STUNTS.






hiding
 Quoting: Truth 1818


When confronted with questions about how they got to the Moon, NASA informs everybody that 'we don't have that technology anymore'
 Quoting: graff2


Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used?
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Nerio

User ID: 77246629
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 10:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Somebody filmed those first steps
Nerio

User ID: 77246629
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 10:03 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Didn't even have colour television at that time
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 10:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
...


different angle and lighting. craters are less visible in the part at 1:30 as the light is from behind the camera and we don't see the shadowed part of the crater.
 Quoting: LHP598


Different lighting?
How? did they screw a different sun in?
Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space?
 Quoting: Drone#6


Learn to read. I explained it in the post that the sun is from a different direction. The camera has been moved between the two different shots being discussed.
 Quoting: LHP598


Actually you said 'different angle and lighting'.
The photo may be from a different angle but the lighting must the same, even between the beginning and end of the mission the suns angle didn't change that much.
 Quoting: Drone#6

since the camera is not pointing the same direction then the angle of lighting relative to the camera is different. One is from the side and one is from behind. Perhaps I should have said "of" instead of "and" but I bet most people can still understand what was meant. But it could be argued that the lighting conditions are different as well as the camera is in the sun when it is was lit from the side and in the shadow when lit from behind. Thus there would be exposure differences.

But hey, can you explain what angle of the sun will cause the nearby ground to be clearly lit but the other few million hectares and horizon to completely disappear?
 Quoting: Drone#6


That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 10:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Somebody filmed those first steps
 Quoting: Nerio


the camera attached to the MESA did which was lowered via lanyard.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Didn't even have colour television at that time
 Quoting: Nerio


Maybe you didn't. But CBS started broad casting in color in 1951.
[link to www.thoughtco.com (secure)]
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Nerio

User ID: 77246629
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 10:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Somebody filmed those first steps
 Quoting: Nerio


the camera attached to the MESA did which was lowered via lanyard.
 Quoting: LHP598


Yeah. Lasted out there all the way to the moon.

Pull the other one
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
Somebody filmed those first steps
 Quoting: Nerio


the camera attached to the MESA did which was lowered via lanyard.
 Quoting: LHP598


Yeah. Lasted out there all the way to the moon.

Pull the other one
 Quoting: Nerio


why wouldn't it? Until the MESA was lowered it wouldn't have been exposed.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Drone#6

User ID: 77248107
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean.
 Quoting: LHP598


What makes you think I can't read? You are funny!
It's not low resolution and detail, it's total black where the ground should be.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Watch the video. Go to 1:30.

The Camera is looking DOWN at the astronaut at the end of the steps. LOOKING DOWN. Why don't you actually look at the video now?

You can see the clearly lit ground (Lit by the SUN according to NASA) for about 2-3 yards just behind him. After that the ground is black. BLACK. DARK. No light.

Black.

My question is simple: Why is the sun not illuminating the ground past the astronaut more than about 3 yards?
As the sun is still there and we are watching from the LM, the only conclusion is that the ground is not visible BECAUSE IT ISN'T THERE.

Where did the moon go at 1:30 ?

Could it be that the MGM Borehamwood studio where this was filmed doesn't have very large soundstages?
Dr. Deplorable AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

01/03/2019 10:51 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean.
 Quoting: LHP598


What makes you think I can't read? You are funny!
It's not low resolution and detail, it's total black where the ground should be.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Watch the video. Go to 1:30.

The Camera is looking DOWN at the astronaut at the end of the steps. LOOKING DOWN.
 Quoting: Drone#6

No it's not. It's looking to the side, it's on the MESA and it's looking to the side at the astronaut on the end of the ladder. The horizon is in frame, it's not looking down.
astrobanner2
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 10:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean.
 Quoting: LHP598


What makes you think I can't read? You are funny!
 Quoting: Drone#6

well the question I answered was why it appeared smooth.

It's not low resolution and detail, it's total black where the ground should be.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Watch the video. Go to 1:30.
 Quoting: Drone#6

the part closest to the camera? this is the first time you've made that clear. It is in shadow which looks darker due to the bright sunlit ground beyond.

The Camera is looking DOWN at the astronaut at the end of the steps. LOOKING DOWN. Why don't you actually look at the video now?

You can see the clearly lit ground (Lit by the SUN according to NASA) for about 2-3 yards just behind him. After that the ground is black. BLACK. DARK. No light.

Black.
 Quoting: Drone#6

Its called shadow. Not a really hard concept to understand.

My question is simple: Why is the sun not illuminating the ground past the astronaut more than about 3 yards?
As the sun is still there and we are watching from the LM, the only conclusion is that the ground is not visible BECAUSE IT ISN'T THERE.
 Quoting: Drone#6

So are you back to the shadowed area or the area past him in sunlight? The dark area is shadowed, the sunlit area past him appears to fall off due to terrain but I would say far more than 3 yards is visible.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Drone#6

User ID: 77248107
United Kingdom
01/03/2019 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
No it's not a shadow.

Here is the picture:

[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

See the astronaut?
See the ground?
Realise that the camera is higher than the astronaut?
Ergo: the camera is pointed DOWN.

About 3 yards behind the astronaut it goes black.
You say it's a shadow - from what?
Why is there no shadow at his feet?

Shadows work the other way around, they are dark nearby and light further away. Here it is light nearby and dark further away: so how is that a shadow??
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
01/03/2019 11:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
No it's not a shadow.

Here is the picture:

[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

See the astronaut?
See the ground?
Realise that the camera is higher than the astronaut?
Ergo: the camera is pointed DOWN.

About 3 yards behind the astronaut it goes black.
You say it's a shadow - from what?
Why is there no shadow at his feet?

Shadows work the other way around, they are dark nearby and light further away. Here it is light nearby and dark further away: so how is that a shadow??
 Quoting: Drone#6

So you're talking about the right side of the image now?
The shadow across the bottom of the image is from the LM. I see a shadow at his feet, not sure why you can't.
And it appears to me that the camera is looking to the side more than down.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law