NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL

There are photos and documentation of everything. Have you bothered to look? Doesn't seem like it.


Obviously it folded. It even gives a clue in the link YOU posted (ERECTABLE S-band seems to imply it sets up somehow) Likely it was stored in the MESA bay that the astronaut pictured is standing near. Why don't you know already?


Since the pic is in a US museum, it is unlikely it is the one that stayed on the Moon.
Since the link says it is for Apollo 11, then it is impossible it is the one used on Apollo 17 that tracked the liftoff. You aren't even trying to understand, are you?

Seems there's a video showing apollo blasting off from the moon, and the camera follows apollo as it goes up. Were there robotics that moved the camera, to follow apollo as it blasted into the moon's atmosphere?

Ask Congress. They are the ones that cut funding to the Apollo program while it was still in progress. They are the ones that control the budget.



Do you have a telescope with a mirror a few hundred feet across? That is the only way you'll view it from Earth. The Dawes' limit shows that
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
The stuff left behind has been imaged from lunar orbit.

It was remotely controlled from Houston by Ed Fendell, the same guy that controlled it during the EVAs previously.

It must be a LONG ways to the moon from the earth. Apollo must have been going FAST. How did they survive?

All these things that you know about going to the moon - how do you know what you researched wasn't fiction or faked to begin with? What if they fed you a detailed line of bull?

I gotta get off this forum for tonight. See you tomorrow!

How would they not? There is no speed more dangerous than another. It is acceleration that is dangerous in high amounts. How can you not even know the distance to the Moon? Have you done ANY research at all?


Multiple sources agreeing with each tends to hold more weight then hoaxies that can't come up with a claim that stands up to scrutiny in 40 years and often make claims that show they don't even understand basic science.


So you can gish gallop some more? You mentioned in another thread you think the moon is a hologram. And it is clear your research skills are nonexistent. Perhaps you should read before you throw out more baseless claims.

Their heavy-lift anti-grav Cosmospheres with DEWs ruled by the time our space planes were ready in the 80's.

Last Edited by hillbilly on 01/02/2019 08:47 PM

Different lighting?
How? did they screw a different sun in?
Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space?

Just check the telemetry data. Oh wait, NASA lost it. My bad.

The moon is a giant antennae and if you could see the back you would see the concave part with the antennae pointing out the center. That is why MTV made the VMA award in the shape of a moon man. lol ;)

Learn to read. I explained it in the post that the sun is from a different direction. The camera has been moved between the two different shots being discussed.

Last Edited by LHP598 on 01/03/2019 08:11 AM

The temp on the moon ranges from -280 to +220...

How did those suits regulate their temperature without emitting any vapor?

Yawn the Koran is always right.

When confronted with questions about how they got to the Moon, NASA informs everybody that 'we don't have that technology anymore'

Last Edited by graff2 on 01/03/2019 08:52 AM

Actually you said 'different angle and lighting'.
The photo may be from a different angle but the lighting must the same, even between the beginning and end of the mission the suns angle didn't change that much.

But hey, can you explain what angle of the sun will cause the nearby ground to be clearly lit but the other few million hectares and horizon to completely disappear?

the temperature of the surface is in those ranges. A vacuum has no temperature. And it takes time for the surface to heat up to max and cool down to min. they landed in lunar morning so it was at neither of those extremes when they were there.

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used?

Somebody filmed those first steps

Didn't even have colour television at that time

since the camera is not pointing the same direction then the angle of lighting relative to the camera is different. One is from the side and one is from behind. Perhaps I should have said "of" instead of "and" but I bet most people can still understand what was meant. But it could be argued that the lighting conditions are different as well as the camera is in the sun when it is was lit from the side and in the shadow when lit from behind. Thus there would be exposure differences.



That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean.

the camera attached to the MESA did which was lowered via lanyard.

Maybe you didn't. But CBS started broad casting in color in 1951.
[link to www.thoughtco.com (secure)]

Yeah. Lasted out there all the way to the moon.

Pull the other one

why wouldn't it? Until the MESA was lowered it wouldn't have been exposed.

What makes you think I can't read? You are funny!
It's not low resolution and detail, it's total black where the ground should be.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Watch the video. Go to 1:30.

The Camera is looking DOWN at the astronaut at the end of the steps. LOOKING DOWN. Why don't you actually look at the video now?

You can see the clearly lit ground (Lit by the SUN according to NASA) for about 2-3 yards just behind him. After that the ground is black. BLACK. DARK. No light.

Black.

My question is simple: Why is the sun not illuminating the ground past the astronaut more than about 3 yards?
As the sun is still there and we are watching from the LM, the only conclusion is that the ground is not visible BECAUSE IT ISN'T THERE.

Where did the moon go at 1:30 ?

Could it be that the MGM Borehamwood studio where this was filmed doesn't have very large soundstages?

No it's not. It's looking to the side, it's on the MESA and it's looking to the side at the astronaut on the end of the ladder. The horizon is in frame, it's not looking down.

well the question I answered was why it appeared smooth.


the part closest to the camera? this is the first time you've made that clear. It is in shadow which looks darker due to the bright sunlit ground beyond.


Its called shadow. Not a really hard concept to understand.


So are you back to the shadowed area or the area past him in sunlight? The dark area is shadowed, the sunlit area past him appears to fall off due to terrain but I would say far more than 3 yards is visible.

No it's not a shadow.

Here is the picture:

[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

See the astronaut?
See the ground?
Realise that the camera is higher than the astronaut?
Ergo: the camera is pointed DOWN.

About 3 yards behind the astronaut it goes black.
You say it's a shadow - from what?
Why is there no shadow at his feet?

Shadows work the other way around, they are dark nearby and light further away. Here it is light nearby and dark further away: so how is that a shadow??

So you're talking about the right side of the image now?
The shadow across the bottom of the image is from the LM. I see a shadow at his feet, not sure why you can't.
And it appears to me that the camera is looking to the side more than down.

Sorry I don't know how to insert images into the post, but I have now added arrows to this one:

[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

The green arrow marks the mysterious edge of the moon, that some people are saying is a shadow or horizon.

The blue arrow shows the 3 yard distance from his feet to the mysterious edge.

The yellow dotted line from a bit of the extra chunky step ladder - to the top of the helmet - to the ground. You'll note that the line ends on the mysterious line picked out by the green arrow.

So this CAN'T be the horizon. And there is nothing to cause any shadow there to wherever the horizon should be.

So the green arrow must be pointing to the edge of the MGM soundstage. QED.