Dark Overlord 9/11 hacks: Document indicating flight 93 was shot down?

Nothing new under the sky. It is old and I heard it before.

This video is a closer examination of the Flight 93 incident. It is a portion of the excellent 5-hour 9/11 investigative film "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" by Massimo Mazzucco.

9/11 - Flight 93 - A Closer Look

I know the theory that it was shot down is well-known, but the document being referenced in the video is a new find.

I watched the news live right after flight 93 went down. All the witnesses that they talked to initially said it was shot down.

Some of those witnesses are in this video



Last Edited by Pacifica on 01/06/2019 03:12 AM

is that a conspiracy theory?

Isn't the shoot down exactly what is supposed to happen in scenarios like 9/11?

Why weren't the rest of the planes shot down after the first plane hit the twin towers?

"we do neither affirm nor deny"

Was that the official response on flight 93?

I did write it : "conspiracy theorists" . . . . as I don't actually like that term . . . I think I'll edit that part to save misunderstanding.

Good post!

Watching video

5:48 - watch woman behind Rumsfeld when he says "shot down"

Let's say they did shoot it down.

What other choice did they have?

Let it fly into the Capitol or WH? They would never let that happen.

Ive always thought it was shot down. Had a few people I know in the usaf say that was the common sentiment amongst the enlisted and lower officer ranks as well.

But, but, but...

It was the American heroes, and the flight attendant with her cell phone.

Don't you remember 'LETS ROLL!'

<sarc>

Everyone with half a brian knows it was shot down.

Another question is, was this part of the script all along? Did they storyboard every 'scene' so they could play out the movie? And have this all on the shelf to feed to the public?

It was not responding to calls and it was headed for DC within 20 minutes flight time.

Changes nothing imho if the passengers attempted to retake plane, and the plane was brought down by military intervention.

Its hard to imagine the 'cell phone' calls were real.


The hand-off mechanisms for cell technology is sensitive and complex. A main reason cell phones have been banned on planes is the havoc they would create the tower network.

This link describes the issues that occur when using a cell phone - even the old 800-900 Mhz phones from 2001 - on an airplane.

[link to theconversation.com]




Cellular use on a plane at cruising altitude breaks all three of these expectations. Simply put, calls in the sky may interfere with the proper functioning of this complex system – particularly if a couple hundred passengers all had their cellular radios on – such that users on the ground are affected.

Yeah, reading an article like that, from 2018, really does make me wonder about the supposed cell phone calls way back in 2001.

You have probably seen this? . . there's an experiment (at the 2 minute mark in the video) it was done in 2003, using 3 different cell phones at different altitudes, they found that at an altitude of only 8,000 feet, all 3 cell phones were useless. .



Last Edited by Pacifica on 01/06/2019 12:43 PM

i have video frames of no planes AND explosions of the twin towers...

False Flag Sheeple

I've got the original document from Layer 1 of DarkOverlords hack.

Covered here: Thread: Engineer solves 9/11....in his backyard (Page 7)

It's interesting.

Some suspicions that 93 was shot down by a fighter scrambled by a general who wasn't supposed to put fighters in the air. 93 was supposed to hit the Capitol Building and render Congress ineffective and incapable of deliberating.

This deserves a pin.

??????

If it was shot down,then doesn't that kinda debunk the "inside job" theory ?

Not necessarily. Could have been a command and control error or factions were acting outside the theater of the conspirators. Theres also the chance this was part of the script for some reason. They came up with that cell phone shit pretty quick it seemed, maybe the script was already written.