The U.S. has SUNK a Chinese Submarine in the Sea of Japan

Right,

Darth, must get all his news from Fox, CNN, or NBC.


You better believe that the american people will be the last to know if something like this happened.

so, we took out 2 of their subs?

If a Chinese sub had been sunk we'd most certainly know.

I can't believe people are taking this seriously.

how fast are their ICBMs?

I have no clue if the alleged incident happened. However, considering the saber rattling from the Chicoms, it is quite plausible.

I have been privy to info that was once classified or simply forgotten.

These types of incidents have happened repeatedly and the general public sometimes NEVER finds out.

For example, I have an elderly friend. His father was an active duty US Navy Chief. In 1939, his father was leading Chinese troops in China fighting the Japanese. Who ever heard that we were attacking the Japanese 2 years before Pearl Harbor? I'll bet the Japanese knew exactly what was going on.

In the late 1960s, there were numerous incidents in the Indian Ocean where Soviet ships were alleged to try and ram US Navy ships. I was told by one of my profs at West Point, an active duty naval officer who was there, that in fact, it was the US Navy trying to ram the Soviet ships. My naval prof said it was all about getting a bigger budget for the Indian Ocean fleet.

How many terrorist camps did we hit in places like Libya where we never said a thing and the embarrassed Libyans never said anything either? This happened many times.

I am improving my preps. We peasants have no control over world events.

Jake, I read scripture every day. Literally. Gog and Magog, in my opinion are Russia and China. I'm not skeptical about scripture at all.

Just this report. Because if the US did that, there is zero doubt there will be full on war.

All I get from a Bing search (Bing!) of "Chinese submarine sunk" is this article from The National Interest: In 2003, a Chinese Submarine May Have Sunk for a Terrifying Reason: Crew Suffocation

Not saying OP is bullshitting, but the article itself is interesting.

[link to nationalinterest.org (secure)]

From what I understand, the US military practices extraterritoriality. Meaning it doesn't recognize the laws of any other country when it comes to rules of engagement, because the US military rules the world.

I once worked for a retired navy admiral. This is back during the first gulf war. What the public does not know would blow their mind. We were sinking ships all over the place in the run up to the war.

Every time something made the news or the intelligence channels, this retired admiral would always say "the oceans are big and deep... and the US navy never forgets". And I know for a fact that SOB never forgot. Anyone that crossed him eventually got sunk.

Another interesting rabbit hole I went down regarding the BS-64 is an obscure reference I found to her whilst looking into any of the world's naval vessels that had ever suffered total power losses, and whether the USS Fitzgerald's strange collision and cover up may have been because it had been dead in the water. (attacked by a Chinese r-EMP weapon.)

That whole deal about the Fitz' not seeing, or having it's radar jammed, or in operation hasnt gelled with folks in the know, and more and more, it looks like the vessel suffered a complete shut down, the same fate/demonstration the HMS Astute faced.

So that being said, why was the Fitz' where it was in the first place? Using AIS Vessel Finder, you can plot vessels, and they have a time slider function, much like G/E. You can change the map type between surface vessel finder and 'nautical map'.

In Nautical Map mode, it provides a lot more information on terrain and especially obstacles that would be important to ALL kinds of shipping using an area.

One such obstacle is a sub surface cable. A submarine cable.

If you follow said cable and then look at the course of the Fitz' and they are almost identical for a few hours. So why would the Fit'z be tracking along the cable? Likely it was tracking a sub that was following the cable, or a smaller sub that was following or perhaps even hacking the cable?

Those with a good memory will immediately see a few key words leap out of all that.

I know much of our interest centered on the French subs, but it was the Russian subs with the calibrators and the specialist equipment.

This equipment might be out in the light now? Were cables cut/hacked/grafted? Was the Fitz' hit with an r-EMP weapon?

Interesting stuff. Feels like old times.

From what I understand, the US military practices extraterritoriality. Meaning it doesn't recognize the laws of any other country when it comes to rules of engagement, because the US military rules the world.