|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Can Not Prove the Earth is Spinning - Amazing, after 500 years of Heliocentrism!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Brickbanana |
|
Post Content
|
I like how flat earthers use a lack of evidence as empirical evidence for their #assumption.
'well i never seent a video of earth doing a spin, so obviously earth isn't round' -_-
Remember how flat earthers like to dry hump their 'world map' and how the sun and moon 'go in circles above it' ??
They have never been able to explain why the paths of eclipses go in the shape of an S. Their moon, according to them, only goes in perfect circles around the Earth, so how does the path of totality for a solar eclipse move in the shape of an S?
A spinning globe Earth easily explains this pattern.
But i digress. where's my tea?
never said it was flat just can't empirically prove it is spinning. and the math that does prove it is spinning also proves that it is possible it is not spinning - so that is not much of a proof.
from what i have seen flat earthers think the sun going over head actually creates an S type ying yang pattern which they feel is 'proof' of ancient Eastern knowledge of the true cosmology
the Chinese were also the last culture to accept the Heliocentric system
Quoting: Rudolph Embroglio Neil DeGrasse Tyson told me it was an oblate spheroid after I was shown the 1976 Voyager (the original blue marble) image for years. Which is right?? Why is my globe a sphere underneath the terrain texture? Why is my "pear-shaped spheroid" now spherical? The earth, therefore, must be shape-shifting...without a doubt. Labor pains? If anyone remembers the hollow earth spitting out a baby planetoid moon... Just know that mountains were subterranean magma spires that eventually, through at least a year of weathering, had all the loose sandy soil carted away from them. And that sandy soil continues until it settles on the ocean floor, where 'the love of things' magically transforms it into skyscrapers, parking garages, and traffic-jammed highways. Sand taken from deep-water trenches, only to be filled with what was more recently part of a mountain. And we are silly to be saying that the water is rising, when we are using the foundation of terra firma to build on top of the land itself... Looking to be epically proven wrong on the nature of the peaks and troughs of the planet. Just have a feeling we have a misunderstanding that has been spread as absolute, indisputable fact for far too long. Shoot me down! End my madness!  
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
