Partial crustal shift and the Sun / earth , new EARTH UNDER FIRE video pg 116

No. Think of the bowls as the outer crust. The two poles push away from each other. The change in the magnetics disrupts the cohesiveness of the plates. The path of least resistance being the ring of fire. Perhaps a new ring forms. The mantle keeps spinning.

Going back to my corner to think about this. I think I am wrong.

DuckNcover finallly someone gets what I've been saying, the magnetosphere will be weakened and that will cause a PARTIAL crustal shift.

forgive me, I've been keeping this thread on life support it seem's forever and my point is finally getting across. I'v been posting and posting with no replies, and I was begining to wonder if anyone even cares. I was just going to get drunk tonight and then delete the whole dam thing

Pinned with Karma, don’t delete! Great thread

I’ve been reading more, less posting. Looks like my hip waders won’t help me in Louisiana though, lol.

If the electromagnetic disturbance were to effect the cohesive bond between a tectonic plate and the mantle you would still need an outside force such as a micro nova or large solar flare to effect the topside of the plate.


from the original post

The earths crust could float on a layer of electromagnetic plasma during which the areas affected could be displaced by the plasma comprised of neutral matter and solar radiation.
I believe we have between 6 to 10 years before the next major shift.

"Several studies have shown, for example, that cosmic rays impact cloud formation leading to greater cloud covers during solar minima.
While the energy of cosmic rays is absorbed by other particles when they collide in the Earth’s atmosphere, these “cascade particles” take on the momentum and energy of the cosmic rays and reach the Earth’s surface, and along with surviving cosmic rays, penetrate into the Earth’s crust extending the cascade effect deep into the earth’s mantle and eventually reaching the core.
Sub-atomic particles which are created as a byproduct of the collision of cosmic rays and air molecules, such as muons and neutrinos, more easily penetrate into the Earth’s mantle and core due to their smaller cross section.

So, I’m all honesty. What states in the USA are safest to habitat while all of this is going down? Serious question

Western North carolina, West Virginia, Kentucky, Northern Florida, Tennessee, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, northern Texas, to begin with. Depends on your situation. Stay away from densely populated areas...

When might this be??

MK do you follow the youtube channel iceage farmer I was just viewing his latest video about the polar vortex ?

I have a theory based on observations about earth crustal displacement theory, that has to do with the electromagnetic connection with the sun,
and the geology of the earths crust.

The concept of pole shift is not a new one, and I am familiar with the theories of Hapgood and Vilikovski. My theory is only different in magnitude, and scale.
I believe that the earths crust can shift regionally and in places where the crust is thicker or thinner, or where the crust is under tension.




The recent discoveries of the planets electromagnetic connection to the sun has been proven to cause earthquakes, this has long been the theory but now science
has caught up. As we are now going through a magnetic pole shift, which is weakening the earths magnetosphere and making the earth more susceptible to the suns
effects, we can also now detect neutral matter being ejected from the earths outer mantel and can expect to start seeing stresses on weak geographical regions of the earths crust.


Looking at the geology of the earths crustal plates at the boundaries we can see where the plates are sinking and where they are rising. The plates differ in thickness
randomly, but through observation we could determine where the weakest and most likely breaks could occur.

Much like an ice shelf breaks away from Antarctica these random pieces of crust would only need to slip a little to cause a major catastrophe, as we have seen when
there is a major slip of faults these would create an entirely new fault line in the crust rising or falling hundreds of feet and could be very large pieces.





Recent research of solar micro nova proves that our sun could be over due, and I believe that the reason our magnetic poles are wondering and the sun is so quiet
is because these are precursors to the event. Based on the predicted date of when our magnetic poles reach a 40 degree angle and the time of solar cycle 25's escalation period
The earths crust could float on a layer of electromagnetic plasma during which the areas affected could be displaced by the plasma comprised of neutral matter and solar radiation.
I believe we have between 6 to 10 years before the next major shift.

"Several studies have shown, for example, that cosmic rays impact cloud formation leading to greater cloud covers during solar minima.
While the energy of cosmic rays is absorbed by other particles when they collide in the Earth’s atmosphere, these “cascade particles” take on the momentum and energy of the cosmic rays and reach the Earth’s surface, and along with surviving cosmic rays, penetrate into the Earth’s crust extending the cascade effect deep into the earth’s mantle and eventually reaching the core.
Sub-atomic particles which are created as a byproduct of the collision of cosmic rays and air molecules, such as muons and neutrinos, more easily penetrate into the Earth’s mantle and core due to their smaller cross section.
The impact of cosmic rays through their cascading effect can be visualized as a shotgun blast that carries the energy of the primary cosmic rays deep into the Earth’s interior through “cascade particles” and their sub-atomic byproducts.



The penetration of cosmic rays into the Earth’s surface has had the effect of triggering seismic activity and volcanic eruptions, as confirmed by a team of four Japanese scientists. In a June 2011 study of 11 volcanic eruptions titled “Explosive volcanic eruptions triggered by cosmic rays”, the scientists found that cosmic rays were a factor in triggering nine of the eruptions:
It is well known that the cosmic-ray flux is negatively correlated with solar magnetic activity, as the strong magnetic field in the solar wind repels charged particles such as galactic cosmic rays that originate from outside of the solar system. The strong negative correlation observed between the timing of silica-rich eruptions and solar activity can be explained by variations in cosmic-ray flux arising from solar modulation.
The Japanese study confirms that cosmic rays, through their cascade effect, do have an influence inside the Earth’s interior. The critical question is: “how deep into the Earth’s interior do cosmic rays penetrate?”

Studies show that the energy transmitted by cosmic rays can be carried deep into the Earth’s interior:
During solar minimum high energy cosmic radiation can penetrate to a very deep distance below the Earth’s surface, in some case a few hundred kilometers. This is the reason why most if not all earthquakes during solar minimum are deep earthquakes."- Michael Salla.

"If the Earth’s core is being stimulated by cosmic rays into emitting neutral matter in analogous manner to a Coronal Mass Ejection by the sun, is there any evidence of this occurring? The most compelling sign would be if the Earth’s core, like the sun, was observed to be emitting cosmic rays. Indeed, this has occurred with cosmic ray detectors discovering cosmic rays coming out of the Earth, rather than penetrating into it.
Cosmic rays observed to be coming out of Antarctica were first detected in January 2007 when the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) balloon experiment began, as explained by the science writer, Emma Fiala:
Using sensors, ANITA began detecting high energy neutrinos interacting with the ice sheet below….During ANITA’s time in the Antarctic, it detected never before seen “upward-pointing cosmic-ray-like events.” The rays detected had horizontal planes of polarization, which may suggest they didn’t originate in space.
Cosmic rays coming out of the Antarctic ice sheets were observed again by ANITA in December 2016 and sparked intense scientific speculation over whether a new type of particle had been discovered. This led to a team of scientists at Penn State University studying the ANITA data, and on September 25, 2018, releasing released their report about the anomalous 2007 and 2016 events which was published on the scholarly archive, arxiv.org:"

It should be noted that on both January 2007 and December 2016, the sunspot numbers were respectively at or near the solar minimum for sunspot activity. Consequently, it should be noted that at the same time as cosmic rays were peaking as they were coming into our solar system due to minimal solar activity, that Cosmic-like rays were observed to be coming out of the Earth.

Links..

[link to phys.org (secure)] Magnetic effect of plate tectonics
[link to exonews.org (secure)]
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] the 3 types of crust
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] passive margin tectonics
[link to www.the-science-site.com]
[link to sites.northwestern.edu]
[link to spaceweathernews.com]

[link to arxiv.org (secure)] Time-variable electromagnetic planet-star interaction

Playing catch up this a.m. and checking in here to say I'm starting to believe that the loud sonic booms we're feeling in Wake County (NC), surrounding areas is crustal displacement symptoms. Over the wkend, talked to lots of folks in my network and everyone is talking about these booms (not just my rural 'hood either).

And yeah, Storm, John Moore's references do turn off a lot of folks. IMHO I've always tossed out all the names (Wormwood, Nibiru, Planet X, etc) chalking it up to the ancient cultures recordings being portrayed in various ways but have a common theme/end result.

Keep this thread going, folks.

Pinned again for relevance and good info.

nope, and I would be concerned about the Caribbean tectonic plate it's been very active lately.

[link to geology.com (secure)]