So why do you think 9/11 was an inside job.

Rogan is the biggest ptb mouthpiece out there...and the op is to dumb to cover all this up...

Also - OP, the URL under yourname goes to the website First Contact Radio which has the following links. Care to eexplain?
[link to www.firstcontactradio.com]
911 Truth
AE911truth.org
911truth
Pilots for 911 Truth
Firefighters for 911 Truth
Military Officers for 911 Truth
Scholars for 911 Truth
911 Truth News

Flat Earth Playlist
Atlantean Conspiracy
Enclosed World
A Plane Truth
Jeranism
Testing the Globe
Operation High Jump

Geocentric Nostic
Flat Earth: Bible Truth in an Unstable World
Captain Cook and The Old Explorers of Antarctica
Flat Earth Bible
waykiwayki
Flat Earth Vlog
The Firmament, Third Heaven, and Structure of Things Biblical
Flat Earth

Flat Earth=muzz propaganda

We delete that shit here.

Your paranoid physics claiming that NIST is lying just like flat earth paranoid physics claim tha NASA is lying

Flat earth evidence is just as insane as 911 truth evidence. Flatters can’t see the curve, truthers can’t see the pancake theory

Truthers seem to be muzzle huggers that proclaim their innocence

and never before has heavy airliners run into such unique structures at very high speed...WTC 7 was severely damaged by the collapse of the adjacent tower.

Seven.

Alum cant penetrate steal period... And here is a video to prove it with a aluminum bullet at sonic speed hitting a steal plate..

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

forward to 4:25 in the video and its all the proof you need

They are expert LIARS you dumb cunt.

"NIST has stated that it found no corroborating evidence to suggest that explosives were used to bring down the buildings."
- Catherine S. Fletcher, Freedom of Information Act Officer, NIST

"NIST concedes that they found no evidence for explosives.
So we asked them, well, did you look?"
- Steven Jones, Ph.D, Physics Professor Emeritus, BYU

"NIST did not test for the presence of explosive residue."
- Catherine S. Fletcher, Freedom of Information Act Officer, NIST

Lying? Misleading.

From below 4-minute trailer, very good intro.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

----




OP, over 1,700 architects & engineers are part of AE911Truth (non-partisan, non-profit 501c3)



OP if you genuinely want an answer to your question, here you go.

This is the video that won me over.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Last Edited by 0011 on 01/29/2019 01:25 PM

plus building 7 proves it all

The flat earthers also use YouTube videos as there proof. NIST is not misleading. How can the experts lie including everyone in the government, NIST and msm lie? It’s like saying they all colluded to fake the moon landing. There’s just too many people involved, somebody would have spilled the beans by now. It’s absurd.

9/11 truth is a conspiracy theory just like flat earth

lemme get this straight. you're saying

- 1,700 professional architects and engineers use a youtube video to present their argument for 9/11.
- Flat earthers use YouTube videos as their proof.
- Flat earth is a false conspiracy theory.
:: Therefore, 9/11 truth is a false conspiracy theory.

that is called a false analogy op
[link to rationalwiki.org (secure)]

NIST states in their report that they found no evidence of explosives,
yet later confess they did not test for the presence of explosives.

Not misleading?

One might as well say "I didn't look at/test the argument, therefore it must be false."

oh wait........

Last Edited by 0011 on 01/29/2019 08:32 PM

It’s because NIST doesn’t need to look for explosives.

It’s the same argument as a flat earther saying that NASA admitted they lost the technology to go to the moon.

...because you've predetermined that there couldn't have been any.

i'll one-up your fallacy by...an appeal to authority:

thousands of expert scientists disagree with you op. :)



Last Edited by 0011 on 01/29/2019 09:27 PM

Those who deny the pancake theory are the same as those who deny the earth’s curvature

9/11 truthers = flat earthers

Do some research you clown...who you working for the Bush's?...

Flat earthers research too. Never heard of the slogan “research flat earth”

I am not a flat earther...but I'm an eye witness to Mohommed Atta's gang working for the US govt the summer before 9/11...

Why does the OP keep conflating 9/11 with flat earth? The two aren't even remotely connected except in his tiny mind. He also appeals to authority regarding the NIST scientists and then ignores the more than 3000 professionals from many fields who've signed the petition for a real enquiry at ae911truth.org. He also says people don't understand science and then proves that he doesn't understand basic physics by saying that "If each floor gets weak due to office fires, doesn’t is make sense that falling wieght (sic) would make each floor break instantly?" No, OP, that doesn't follow. Floors would only "break instantly" if they provided zero resistance. So, unless the floors were made of paper they've had provided some resistance.

It seems to me that OP is total fkin wank-badger but then hey, it takes all sorts, even morons, to make a world.

I don't know for sure that it was an "inside job".

But I can tell you that the "official story" is a load of horse shit.

Mohammed Atta gang was working for the CIA and secret service...so I'm pretty sure they knew what was up...

ummmmzy steel doesn't BURN ?

BTW

Makes me wonder what else does Rogan lie about and spread on his show?

Rogan is a NWO mouthpiece...he is a cover-up guy...

9/11 engaged non-local factors in the unconscious and transmitted visual, narrative, and symbolic impressions of itself backwards through time.

perhaps there was also a mundane conspiracy, but the spiritual meaning of the event involves the recognition of eternity and the subsequent rebirth of god—not "predictive programming," but some kind of distributed precognition leading to mass religious conversion. you might say this makes it the ultimate "inside" job, but it would be better to say that it complicates this entire distinction; what's inside and what's outside when cognition from the future can influence cognition in the present?

a couple picture-thinking videos i made about this topic...





...you might also check out cassandra, an amazing 7-hour video that my friend david made about the same material:
[link to vimeo.com (secure)]

i also have a 42-hour lecture series about 9/11 sync for people who want to learn more about the hermeneutics involved in this thing:
[link to archive.org (secure)]

obviously my material tends to be pretty long-format—a synchead liability i guess—but i think you'll find that, despite the irrational nature of the contents under investigation, my approach is actually quite data-driven.

anyway, happy knowing.
[link to www.imdb.com (secure)]

go ez on your self though, these particular dominoes seem to fall faster than expected.