Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,193 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 110,969
Pageviews Today: 173,443Threads Today: 73Posts Today: 1,015
01:52 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Can evolution explain the transition of a caterpillar to a butterfly?
Poster Handle DPS7
Post Content

...


If that were true, you could explain why what I said is illogical.

The process of evolution is observable in the present, the evolutionary history of life can only be inferred by the evidence than is observable now. It's not certain, but it's the best we have.

...


Who said it's missing?

Moths are in the phylum Euarthropoda. The earliest arthropods can be found in rock dating to the Cambrian period, which began 545 million years ago. They included trilobites, horseshoe crabs, and crustaceans. Centipedes, millipedes, and scorpions were among the first arthropods to reach dry land.

Moths are in the class Insecta. The oldest definitive insect fossil is the Devonian Rhyniognatha hirsti, estimated at 396-407 million years old.

Lepidoptera is an order of insects that includes butterflies and moths.

Previously, the earliest known lepidopteran fossils were three wings of Archaeolepis mane, a primitive moth-like species from the Jurassic, about 190 million years ago, found in Dorset, UK, which show scales with parallel grooves under a scanning electron microscope and a characteristic wing venation pattern shared with Trichoptera (caddisflies).[4][5] In 2018, the discovery of exquisite fossilised scales from the Triassic-Jurassic boundary were reported in the journal Science Advances. They were found as rare palynological elements in the sediments of the Triassic-Jurassic boundary from the cored Schandelah-1 well, drilled near Braunschweig in northern Germany. This pushes back the fossil record and origin of glossatan lepidopterans by about 70 million years, supporting molecular estimates of a Norian (c. 212 million years) divergence of glossatan and non-glossatan lepidopterans.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77301333


There is not one reason to explain anything to a brainwashed naturalist. You hear and read what you allow yourself to hear and read.

The very fact you follow up with 'but evolution is observable now' is well, laughable and just shows you are not serious at all about the science surrounding evotardism.

Just reverting back to minor changes within a species can lead to huge changes over trillions of years fantasy. We've been down that road before buddy.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75814481


So you have evidence, but you won't give it to me because 'I'm a brainwashed naturalist.' lol, right.

Who do you think you're fooling? You don't have shit. That's why Creationism is a laughing stock, and why it's illegal to teach it in science class. It's not science.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77301333


You still dont understand how the theory of underdeveloped moth larva developing mutations for metamorphisis is waaaaay more complicated and less likely than a creator.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP