Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,323 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 648,306
Pageviews Today: 1,085,940Threads Today: 452Posts Today: 9,138
03:39 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?

 
Drone#6

User ID: 77346249
United Kingdom
02/07/2019 05:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.
 Quoting: Drone#6

And, wondering which town is scheduled for the next directed energy weapons display of power.
 Quoting: DGN


I don't like proving or disproving one subject by discussing the validity of an entirely different subject. It's also logically impossible and irrelevant, start a new thread about new subjects.

Lets stick to the Apollo moon story here and let the pro-NASA people present the evidence for their outlandish claims that they went to the moon.

The problem all pro-NASA Apollo people have is that there is simply zero credible evidence that they went. ZERO. None at all. Their arguments all end with 'Trust NASA and material from NASA'. There's more evidence that Gerry Anderson's Thunderbirds is real than for Apollo.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75942562
Canada
02/07/2019 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.
 Quoting: Drone#6

And, wondering which town is scheduled for the next directed energy weapons display of power.
 Quoting: DGN


I don't like proving or disproving one subject by discussing the validity of an entirely different subject. It's also logically impossible and irrelevant, start a new thread about new subjects.

Lets stick to the Apollo moon story here and let the pro-NASA people present the evidence for their outlandish claims that they went to the moon.

The problem all pro-NASA Apollo people have is that there is simply zero credible evidence that they went. ZERO. None at all. Their arguments all end with 'Trust NASA and material from NASA'. There's more evidence that Gerry Anderson's Thunderbirds is real than for Apollo.
 Quoting: Drone#6


Zero evidence you accept you mean... there is plenty of evidence, including other space agency's confirmation, but you ignore what you choose to.
Are you a flat earth space denier tard?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73800167
United States
02/07/2019 05:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
True Story

They never got past the Van Halen Band


[link to youtu.be (secure)]
Drone#6

User ID: 77346249
United Kingdom
02/07/2019 05:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
see? The HBs don't even understand the methods and procedures they used to leave the surface...unabashed ignorance...The LM ascent stage lifted off the Moon and entered lunar orbit slightly below the CSM (faster orbit ) ….then they caught up and docked....these rendezvous's and dockings were a big part of the Gemini program mission goals.
After liftoff and docking, the LM ascent stage was jettisoned and the LM was deorbited while the CSM did the TEI and returned to Earth.
 Quoting: hotdogg


What is an HB? Hoax Believer? The phrase makes no sense, how can one believe in a lack of belief of the NASA Narrative?

There are NASA story believers and skeptics, that's it. You are the believer here. If you have evidence of the missions then you'll have no need to label skeptics as you would some type of cult member, let your evidence for the landings stand on it's own.

Your casual blast off from the plaster moon model, catch up and docking makes a lovely story but that doesn't mean it is true or even likely. You appear to have no idea how difficult the simple orbit of a Mass-con. infested body such as the moon is, let along the guidance and precision required to dock. More suspicious is that all dockings worked 100% first time, every time, only took a few minutes, were rarely filmed and done with 1960s technology from craft with extremely limited visibility.

Not helping your case is that in general the CSM commanders were so unobservant/blind they even failed to see the stars while orbiting the dark side of the moon, I wouldn't trust any of them at a set of traffic lights let along a complex orbital docking procedure in poorly made tin and mylar cans 250,000 miles away.

So the docking at the moon: Cool story bro., but no one is buying it. Application of the slightest critical thinking causes the story to disintegrate under it's own hubris.
Drone#6

User ID: 77346249
United Kingdom
02/07/2019 05:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
Zero evidence you accept you mean... there is plenty of evidence, including other space agency's confirmation, but you ignore what you choose to.
Are you a flat earth space denier tard?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75942562


Ah I see, another attempt to shift the subject - this time to your flat earth theories when we were discussing the Apollo missions. Right after I

1) just warned against that,
and
2) discussed the orbit of the moon. Duh. Can you see how you missed that part of my post?

So lets leave your flat earth beliefs to a different thread and concentrate on you assertion that somehow it's my fault if I don't accept your manufactured, NASA sourced, inconsistent evidence shall we?

Lets hear your best piece of evidence for Apollo. Go ahead:
Violetag

User ID: 77139758
Netherlands
02/07/2019 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.

The real problem NASA have (apart from the obvious one of having to fight their own illusory past) is that the whole 'we landed on the moon half a century ago' story has now become extremely boring plus the millennial generation really has no reason to care.

Apathy, derision and being ignored are far greater threats to NASA's efforts to spin their moon fantasy than they fact they can't prove a single one of their claims and they have been caught destroying evidence such as the original video tapes and telemetry data: i.e. the detailed proof.

It also doesn't help their case that the US authorities are working hard to teach the world that they are compulsive liars and cheats, and that they are causing so much suffering that even if it was true no one would care either. It's tricky to care about lunar exploration when you're shivering in a tent city wondering where your middle class lifestyle went, or huddling in the wreck of your city with bombs and missiles of 'freedom and democracy' raining down.

The NASA moon mission is completely fake: that's a simple fact, but it has less importance than both sides think it does, it's just another lie.
 Quoting: Drone#6


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.

Last Edited by Violetag on 02/07/2019 05:44 AM
Kryten
Drone#6

User ID: 77346249
United Kingdom
02/07/2019 06:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiation belt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiation belt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag


Yes, the 'destroyed' 'tech' was some thin mylar and aluminium alloy. Ironically any heavy metal (which aluminium / aluminum is classed as for this purpose) has a nasty habit of creating showers of secondary radiation.

For this reason the Orion team are looking at hydrogen rich plastics instead because when radiation hits hydrogen there isn't much secondary - i.e. no neutrons. This will reduce the X-rays and neutron showers inside the crafts.

Additionally the Van Allen belt is just one (2 - 3) radiation speed-bump(s), the rest of space is also full of radiation from the sun, galaxy and cosmos. Some non solar radiation is shielded by the Sun's magnetic field (forming another speed-bump for later!) but enough still gets through to cook biological lifeforms. Then you get secondary radiation from the lunar surface itself, 2-3 days in open space is pretty damaging. There's even a NASA page about the perils of secondary radiation from the lunar surface.

NASA casually sums up the radiation exposure in Apollo to a 'few chest Xrays', forgetting of course that chest X-rays use film that gets 'fogged' by the X-ray radiation, turning blacks to clear areas away from bones etc. getting in the way. Also X-ray operators retreat to lead lined rooms for this procedure for a reason.
So even the X-ray lie fails because if I take all the 160 ASA Apollo film and put in inside an X-ray beam for a few chest X-rays I'd not get those perfect starless blacks that they get on every single roll for every single mission.

Yes, every single black on every single Apollo image proves the photo was faked and never even went near space.

Tnen there's the risk of solar flares, the time of the missions was a solar maxima and there actually was a huge solar flare between two trips, even if the rockets had worked it would have been solar flare roulette at best.

The list of problems goes on - I've really only scratched the surface here.

Last Edited by Drone#6 on 02/07/2019 06:11 AM
Mayor of Simpleton
I know nothing.

User ID: 76961324
United States
02/07/2019 06:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
How did they film that?

MoS
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
How does that little booger have enough fuel to reach escape velocity of the moon(Approximately 5K MPH)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77322868


no air resistance helps. leaving behind the descent stage also helps. Plus they didn't reach escape velocity of the Moon. they only had to reach orbit. the math shows they had the fuel necessary.
 Quoting: LHP598


No slow rising liftoff thrust,just an M80 blasted under a toy model pulled up by ceiling wire.
 Quoting: DGN


it rose at the speed it should based on the thrust to weight ratio.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
How does that little booger have enough fuel to reach escape velocity of the moon(Approximately 5K MPH)?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77322868


no air resistance helps. leaving behind the descent stage also helps. Plus they didn't reach escape velocity of the Moon. they only had to reach orbit. the math shows they had the fuel necessary.
 Quoting: LHP598


uh no. If they didn't reach escape velocity they would still be "orbiting"!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77322868


The ascent stage didn't return. The astronauts transferred into the CSM and the service module pushed them back.

but thanks again for proving that hoaxies know the least about the subject.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77322868


There's a key part in this article where he mentions the Van Allen radiation belts. There are recent videos of NASA Engineers still trying to solve the problem of the Van Allen radiation belts. It was never solved and if the Astronauts had gone through the Van Allen radiation belts it would have killed them quickly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77322868


context. the recent video they were specifically talking about testing the electronics of the new spacecraft. How DARE they want to make sure those will work before sending humans through!! rolleyes
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
So, here's a question...

Who went back to get the tape? They took off, leaving the camera filming them behind.

Don't tell me they had wireless video technology in 1972.
 Quoting: SoberLife


The missions were broadcast live. So yes, they had wireless at the time.
Another hoaxie proving they know the least about the subject.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
see? The HBs don't even understand the methods and procedures they used to leave the surface...unabashed ignorance...The LM ascent stage lifted off the Moon and entered lunar orbit slightly below the CSM (faster orbit ) ….then they caught up and docked....these rendezvous's and dockings were a big part of the Gemini program mission goals.
After liftoff and docking, the LM ascent stage was jettisoned and the LM was deorbited while the CSM did the TEI and returned to Earth.
 Quoting: hotdogg


What is an HB? Hoax Believer? The phrase makes no sense, how can one believe in a lack of belief of the NASA Narrative?

There are NASA story believers and skeptics, that's it. You are the believer here. If you have evidence of the missions then you'll have no need to label skeptics as you would some type of cult member, let your evidence for the landings stand on it's own.

Your casual blast off from the plaster moon model, catch up and docking makes a lovely story but that doesn't mean it is true or even likely. You appear to have no idea how difficult the simple orbit of a Mass-con. infested body such as the moon is, let along the guidance and precision required to dock. More suspicious is that all dockings worked 100% first time, every time, only took a few minutes, were rarely filmed and done with 1960s technology from craft with extremely limited visibility.

Not helping your case is that in general the CSM commanders were so unobservant/blind they even failed to see the stars while orbiting the dark side of the moon, I wouldn't trust any of them at a set of traffic lights let along a complex orbital docking procedure in poorly made tin and mylar cans 250,000 miles away.

So the docking at the moon: Cool story bro., but no one is buying it. Application of the slightest critical thinking causes the story to disintegrate under it's own hubris.
 Quoting: Drone#6

Gee, if only they had spent time practicing orbital rendezvous and docking beforehand. Oh wait, they did. The Gemini program consisted of lots of practice in rendezvous and docking. As for limited visibility, each spacecraft had RADAR to help with the rendezvous as well.

As for seeing stars, it depends on if they turned off the lights in the cabin and let their eyes adjust. Some did, some didn't. ALL saw star when they needed to for navigation purposes
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.

The real problem NASA have (apart from the obvious one of having to fight their own illusory past) is that the whole 'we landed on the moon half a century ago' story has now become extremely boring plus the millennial generation really has no reason to care.

Apathy, derision and being ignored are far greater threats to NASA's efforts to spin their moon fantasy than they fact they can't prove a single one of their claims and they have been caught destroying evidence such as the original video tapes and telemetry data: i.e. the detailed proof.

It also doesn't help their case that the US authorities are working hard to teach the world that they are compulsive liars and cheats, and that they are causing so much suffering that even if it was true no one would care either. It's tricky to care about lunar exploration when you're shivering in a tent city wondering where your middle class lifestyle went, or huddling in the wreck of your city with bombs and missiles of 'freedom and democracy' raining down.

The NASA moon mission is completely fake: that's a simple fact, but it has less importance than both sides think it does, it's just another lie.
 Quoting: Drone#6


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used? Or the facilities to launch them? Or the assembly lines to make them? No? Huh, well maybe we don't have the capability readily available then.

Thank you for mentioning Mars. The path around the Van Allen belts that Apollo used is suitable only for trips to the Moon. Interstellar trips can take a path with that angle so they have to go through the thicker parts of the belt.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 77047820
Netherlands
02/07/2019 08:19 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
They must have had some sweet batteries to power those amazing environmental control systems.

Ray-O-Vac
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 77047820
Netherlands
02/07/2019 08:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.

The real problem NASA have (apart from the obvious one of having to fight their own illusory past) is that the whole 'we landed on the moon half a century ago' story has now become extremely boring plus the millennial generation really has no reason to care.

Apathy, derision and being ignored are far greater threats to NASA's efforts to spin their moon fantasy than they fact they can't prove a single one of their claims and they have been caught destroying evidence such as the original video tapes and telemetry data: i.e. the detailed proof.

It also doesn't help their case that the US authorities are working hard to teach the world that they are compulsive liars and cheats, and that they are causing so much suffering that even if it was true no one would care either. It's tricky to care about lunar exploration when you're shivering in a tent city wondering where your middle class lifestyle went, or huddling in the wreck of your city with bombs and missiles of 'freedom and democracy' raining down.

The NASA moon mission is completely fake: that's a simple fact, but it has less importance than both sides think it does, it's just another lie.
 Quoting: Drone#6


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used? Or the facilities to launch them? Or the assembly lines to make them? No? Huh, well maybe we don't have the capability readily available then.

Thank you for mentioning Mars. The path around the Van Allen belts that Apollo used is suitable only for trips to the Moon. Interstellar trips can take a path with that angle so they have to go through the thicker parts of the belt.
 Quoting: LHP598


Path around?

chuckle
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiation belt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiation belt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag



Yes, the 'destroyed' 'tech' was some thin mylar and aluminium alloy. Ironically any heavy metal (which aluminium / aluminum is classed as for this purpose) has a nasty habit of creating showers of secondary radiation.

For this reason the Orion team are looking at hydrogen rich plastics instead because when radiation hits hydrogen there isn't much secondary - i.e. no neutrons. This will reduce the X-rays and neutron showers inside the crafts.
 Quoting: Drone#6

the Apollo spacecraft also had polyethylene as part of its insulation for that purpose.

Additionally the Van Allen belt is just one (2 - 3) radiation speed-bump(s), the rest of space is also full of radiation from the sun, galaxy and cosmos. Some non solar radiation is shielded by the Sun's magnetic field (forming another speed-bump for later!) but enough still gets through to cook biological lifeforms. Then you get secondary radiation from the lunar surface itself, 2-3 days in open space is pretty damaging. There's even a NASA page about the perils of secondary radiation from the lunar surface.
 Quoting: Drone#6

Quantify it. Prove it was too much for the short time they went. Bet you can't.

NASA casually sums up the radiation exposure in Apollo to a 'few chest Xrays', forgetting of course that chest X-rays use film that gets 'fogged' by the X-ray radiation, turning blacks to clear areas away from bones etc. getting in the way. Also X-ray operators retreat to lead lined rooms for this procedure for a reason.
 Quoting: Drone#6

X-ray operators would be exposed to far more than a "few" even in a week if they didn't retreat. Failed analogy from you.

So even the X-ray lie fails because if I take all the 160 ASA Apollo film and put in inside an X-ray beam for a few chest X-rays I'd not get those perfect starless blacks that they get on every single roll for every single mission.

Yes, every single black on every single Apollo image proves the photo was faked and never even went near space.
 Quoting: Drone#6

So prove the amount of x-rays the film was exposed to should have been too much.

Tnen there's the risk of solar flares, the time of the missions was a solar maxima and there actually was a huge solar flare between two trips, even if the rockets had worked it would have been solar flare roulette at best.
 Quoting: Drone#6

And there were none directed at Earth DURING a mission.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 08:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
The real problem with the moon landings is not that they are clearly faked and that today the fakery is laughably poor.
It's not even that every single aspect is fake and can be taken apart even by a small child.

The real problem NASA have (apart from the obvious one of having to fight their own illusory past) is that the whole 'we landed on the moon half a century ago' story has now become extremely boring plus the millennial generation really has no reason to care.

Apathy, derision and being ignored are far greater threats to NASA's efforts to spin their moon fantasy than they fact they can't prove a single one of their claims and they have been caught destroying evidence such as the original video tapes and telemetry data: i.e. the detailed proof.

It also doesn't help their case that the US authorities are working hard to teach the world that they are compulsive liars and cheats, and that they are causing so much suffering that even if it was true no one would care either. It's tricky to care about lunar exploration when you're shivering in a tent city wondering where your middle class lifestyle went, or huddling in the wreck of your city with bombs and missiles of 'freedom and democracy' raining down.

The NASA moon mission is completely fake: that's a simple fact, but it has less importance than both sides think it does, it's just another lie.
 Quoting: Drone#6


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used? Or the facilities to launch them? Or the assembly lines to make them? No? Huh, well maybe we don't have the capability readily available then.

Thank you for mentioning Mars. The path around the Van Allen belts that Apollo used is suitable only for trips to the Moon. Interstellar trips can take a path with that angle so they have to go through the thicker parts of the belt.
 Quoting: LHP598


Path around?

chuckle
 Quoting: CK Dexter Haven

Yes, around. They are belts, not spheres.




If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
CK Dexter Haven

User ID: 77047820
Netherlands
02/07/2019 08:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
...


I liked the part where the Nasa guy explained it would be a problem to get outside the radiationbelt now because they "destroyed" the tech they had to do that in the past.

So they cant do anymore what they could do 50 years ago lol sounds legit.

There was a post here awhile back linking to a guy from nasa explaining why the radiationbelt would be a problem "now" when trying to go to mars.
 Quoting: Violetag

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used? Or the facilities to launch them? Or the assembly lines to make them? No? Huh, well maybe we don't have the capability readily available then.

Thank you for mentioning Mars. The path around the Van Allen belts that Apollo used is suitable only for trips to the Moon. Interstellar trips can take a path with that angle so they have to go through the thicker parts of the belt.
 Quoting: LHP598


Path around?

chuckle
 Quoting: CK Dexter Haven

Yes, around. They are belts, not spheres.




 Quoting: LHP598


Laughable

"I'm not sure we went far enough out to encounter the Van Allen radiation, maybe we did?"


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

hillary2
rockstar101

User ID: 39914443
United States
02/07/2019 08:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
They need to tie a cable to the moon and then zipline back and forth if they want my vote.

Outer space is fake and gay.
When the one great scorer comes to write against your name, he writes not that you won or lost but how you played the game.

The stance and stare of a wolf you find yourself alone with will tell you that he is prepared to treat you as you would treat him. Whether that comforts or frightens you, he has told you all you need know about both.
Mr. Canna

User ID: 76990600
Canada
02/07/2019 08:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
it is super interesting how the retro-rocket doesnt kick up any dust. Thats the one that throws me the most.
 Quoting: NeverEver


I like how on some of the filmings the 'moon' is only 50' across, then no stars.
 Quoting: DGN

Pretty simple observation....who the FK is on the Moon surface filming and taking pictures while the astronauts fly away...did they leave someone up there?

Or maybe it was ET? He wanted to go home too...LOLOLOL
Grow Your Own
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
it is super interesting how the retro-rocket doesnt kick up any dust. Thats the one that throws me the most.
 Quoting: NeverEver


I like how on some of the filmings the 'moon' is only 50' across, then no stars.
 Quoting: DGN

Pretty simple observation....who the FK is on the Moon surface filming and taking pictures while the astronauts fly away...did they leave someone up there?

Or maybe it was ET? He wanted to go home too...LOLOLOL
 Quoting: Mr. Canna


And again a hoaxie proves they know the least about the subject.

Remote controlled camera run by Ed Fendell in Houston. the camera was controlled by him for each of the EVAs.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77166529
United States
02/07/2019 09:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
...

Do you see any Saturn V rockets lying around waiting to be used? Or the facilities to launch them? Or the assembly lines to make them? No? Huh, well maybe we don't have the capability readily available then.

Thank you for mentioning Mars. The path around the Van Allen belts that Apollo used is suitable only for trips to the Moon. Interstellar trips can take a path with that angle so they have to go through the thicker parts of the belt.
 Quoting: LHP598


Path around?

chuckle
 Quoting: CK Dexter Haven

Yes, around. They are belts, not spheres.




 Quoting: LHP598


Laughable

"I'm not sure we went far enough out to encounter the Van Allen radiation, maybe we did?"


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

hillary2
 Quoting: CK Dexter Haven

Is that the footage where they edited his answers from his Gemini missions in to make it look like he was answering about Apollo?

Even if not, why should he remember what is a pretty uneventful part of the trip? They were on a preplanned trajectory taking them around the thickest parts of the belts. they were bobbing and weaving Buck Rodgers style around pockets of radiation.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42079668
United States
02/07/2019 09:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
We went to the Moon.

a.) Look at how many people were involved. Wouldn't someone have spilled the beans if it were faked?

Only a small handful actually went to space and were involved in the lie, most of the NASA employees were completely oblivious, and watching on screens just like us, thinking its all legit

b.) Russia would have called BS on the moon program if it were faked.

The top leaders in the russian space program and secret government working together, the space race was a big farce and show for the world.

c.) Why is it so hard to believe that we went? It isn't beyond comprehension that we had the technology at the time to do it.

It's so hard to believe because of the hundreds of inconsistencies we find and all the evidence to the contrary, and lack of evidence to prove we actually went. Why is it so hard to believe it was faked?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76383507
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42079668
United States
02/07/2019 09:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
it is super interesting how the retro-rocket doesnt kick up any dust. Thats the one that throws me the most.
 Quoting: NeverEver


I like how on some of the filmings the 'moon' is only 50' across, then no stars.
 Quoting: DGN

Pretty simple observation....who the FK is on the Moon surface filming and taking pictures while the astronauts fly away...did they leave someone up there?

Or maybe it was ET? He wanted to go home too...LOLOLOL
 Quoting: Mr. Canna


And again a hoaxie proves they know the least about the subject.

Remote controlled camera run by Ed Fendell in Houston. the camera was controlled by him for each of the EVAs.
 Quoting: LHP598


Delay in radio communications by 2 seconds but this guy could instantly control the camera to pan up and follow?

Care to provide here the technology that was around then to make that possible?
cranberryapple

User ID: 76319881
United States
02/07/2019 09:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
No dust, yet the video shows an expanding cloud of dust. Lol. Your way out of your element bud
cranberryapple
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42079668
United States
02/07/2019 09:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
see? The HBs don't even understand the methods and procedures they used to leave the surface...unabashed ignorance...The LM ascent stage lifted off the Moon and entered lunar orbit slightly below the CSM (faster orbit ) ….then they caught up and docked....these rendezvous's and dockings were a big part of the Gemini program mission goals.
After liftoff and docking, the LM ascent stage was jettisoned and the LM was deorbited while the CSM did the TEI and returned to Earth.
 Quoting: hotdogg


What is an HB? Hoax Believer? The phrase makes no sense, how can one believe in a lack of belief of the NASA Narrative?

There are NASA story believers and skeptics, that's it. You are the believer here. If you have evidence of the missions then you'll have no need to label skeptics as you would some type of cult member, let your evidence for the landings stand on it's own.

Your casual blast off from the plaster moon model, catch up and docking makes a lovely story but that doesn't mean it is true or even likely. You appear to have no idea how difficult the simple orbit of a Mass-con. infested body such as the moon is, let along the guidance and precision required to dock. More suspicious is that all dockings worked 100% first time, every time, only took a few minutes, were rarely filmed and done with 1960s technology from craft with extremely limited visibility.

Not helping your case is that in general the CSM commanders were so unobservant/blind they even failed to see the stars while orbiting the dark side of the moon, I wouldn't trust any of them at a set of traffic lights let along a complex orbital docking procedure in poorly made tin and mylar cans 250,000 miles away.

So the docking at the moon: Cool story bro., but no one is buying it. Application of the slightest critical thinking causes the story to disintegrate under it's own hubris.
 Quoting: Drone#6

Gee, if only they had spent time practicing orbital rendezvous and docking beforehand. Oh wait, they did. The Gemini program consisted of lots of practice in rendezvous and docking. As for limited visibility, each spacecraft had RADAR to help with the rendezvous as well.

As for seeing stars, it depends on if they turned off the lights in the cabin and let their eyes adjust. Some did, some didn't. ALL saw star when they needed to for navigation purposes
 Quoting: LHP598


Eilonwy

User ID: 77197203
Canada
02/07/2019 09:23 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
Fun thread!

Last Edited by Eilonwy on 02/07/2019 09:23 AM
“A grower of turnips or shaper of clay, a commot Farmer or a king--every man is a hero if he strives more for others than for himself alone.”
Lloyd Alexander, The Castle of Llyr
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42079668
United States
02/07/2019 09:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
see? The HBs don't even understand the methods and procedures they used to leave the surface...unabashed ignorance...The LM ascent stage lifted off the Moon and entered lunar orbit slightly below the CSM (faster orbit ) ….then they caught up and docked....these rendezvous's and dockings were a big part of the Gemini program mission goals.
After liftoff and docking, the LM ascent stage was jettisoned and the LM was deorbited while the CSM did the TEI and returned to Earth.
 Quoting: hotdogg


What is an HB? Hoax Believer? The phrase makes no sense, how can one believe in a lack of belief of the NASA Narrative?

There are NASA story believers and skeptics, that's it. You are the believer here. If you have evidence of the missions then you'll have no need to label skeptics as you would some type of cult member, let your evidence for the landings stand on it's own.

Your casual blast off from the plaster moon model, catch up and docking makes a lovely story but that doesn't mean it is true or even likely. You appear to have no idea how difficult the simple orbit of a Mass-con. infested body such as the moon is, let along the guidance and precision required to dock. More suspicious is that all dockings worked 100% first time, every time, only took a few minutes, were rarely filmed and done with 1960s technology from craft with extremely limited visibility.

Not helping your case is that in general the CSM commanders were so unobservant/blind they even failed to see the stars while orbiting the dark side of the moon, I wouldn't trust any of them at a set of traffic lights let along a complex orbital docking procedure in poorly made tin and mylar cans 250,000 miles away.

So the docking at the moon: Cool story bro., but no one is buying it. Application of the slightest critical thinking causes the story to disintegrate under it's own hubris.
 Quoting: Drone#6

Gee, if only they had spent time practicing orbital rendezvous and docking beforehand. Oh wait, they did. The Gemini program consisted of lots of practice in rendezvous and docking. As for limited visibility, each spacecraft had RADAR to help with the rendezvous as well.

As for seeing stars, it depends on if they turned off the lights in the cabin and let their eyes adjust. Some did, some didn't. ALL saw star when they needed to for navigation purposes
 Quoting: LHP598



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668


I like how they read the question and the one guy desperately waits for the other guy to answer, as he has no idea what to say.

Paid liars.
Eilonwy

User ID: 77197203
Canada
02/07/2019 09:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
True Story

They never got past the Van Halen Band


[link to youtu.be (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73800167


And that's how babies are made.
“A grower of turnips or shaper of clay, a commot Farmer or a king--every man is a hero if he strives more for others than for himself alone.”
Lloyd Alexander, The Castle of Llyr