Except I can and I have. It's in the thread so I don't see what you gain by denying it. Here it is again for your convenience:

Apollo 16, photos of Shadow rock! Simple proof of fakery:

[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
Note the incorrent shadows on the LHS (far side, wheel + antenna) of the buggy.
Also note the thick dust shown by footprints and tyre tracks.

Shadow Rock, note the texture and cracks on both up and down facing slopes indicating it is free from dust on top.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

With Astronaut checking out the shadow
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

With stick and then also an astronaut leaning up against it (note: dust free!)
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

As the dust all around the rock is UNDISTURBED the rock must have arrived FIRST, then the dust came like snow.
The dust gradually accumulated over MILLIONS/BILLIONS of years to get there....
....so why is there NO dust on top of the rock? Why is there NONE in the nooks and crannies?
....Why is there dust under the overhang, shadow area? How did it get there?

Here's another rock with the same problem in Apollo 17:
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

The only possible explanation for this rock being clean is WEATHERING that washed and/or blew the dust off the rock.
As the moon is in a hard vacuum there is only one conclusion: This photo was taken on EARTH.