|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Give me everything you got on why global warming is bullshit
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
dr Patrick Moore formerly of Greenpeace
main climate change discussion starts at 10:00 , altho interesting talk about forestry at 8:00
in particular pay attention to the graphs showing co2 and temperature levels over historical periods of millions of years. pause the video and take a close look
we are currently near the lowest co2 levels earth has ever experienced, and about 1/4 of the average level of co2
******
main point is that co2 levels have naturally risen about 8 times the current level and on average have been 4 times higher
so it makes no sense to believe we are at risk of some kind of run away greenhouse effect
at most we might push the earth towards levels of co2 it has typically experienced in the past
end all life on earth ? no
also we are currently going up at 2 ppm per year so it would take us about 500 years to get to the AVERAGE level of co2 around 1500 ppm (roughly)
do you begin to see this alarmism makes no sense ?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76196021 the graph of co2 and temperature over millions of years [ link to medium.com (secure)] look at the scale , we are all the way at the right , where co2 levels are comparatively the lowest emails between the cabal of climate scientists who cooked up the "global warming" political scam were hacked reading the hacked emails revealed [ link to www.forbes.com (secure)] Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.***** defenders claim they were exonerated of apparent wrongdoing exposed in these emails but its BS , the emails clearly show them talking about preventing skeptical peer scientists from getting data, being able to participate in the scientific debate , etc
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
