NASA Thrust Equation gets destroyed.

No even cares

Why one star? Did you debunk the video? Isn’t the math correct? Clearly the math is correct. NASA is proven mathematically to be liars.

Unbalanced242 back with another installment of "debunk my video because I'm an asshole with nothing better to do"

no debunk my video because I know you can't and it's the truth

Absolute :bs2:.

i havent even watched your dumbass video because i dont care

you can't bs math

what are the dots of light going over at night, matching the sighting guides for various satellites/space stations...and can be seen from widely separated viewing sites 100 miles away at the same time (at a different angle, of course)?

you can't bs orbital mechanics either...

It could be plane or balloons. The night sky was sparkling with start and lights before satellites

Still can’t bs math

Bad interpretations of facts, even using math, can be BS, though.

Im going to destroy the wife tonight with my own thrust equation.

It’s not bs. The fluid dynamics equation is used in Many industries. The velocity of gas in the nozzle pipe is equal to the exit velocity.

Its pretty simple. No opposing force on the rocket in space. Fling matter out the back and you have propulsion, even with no atmosphere pressure. Nasa didnt think ion thruster would work when first proposed.

Astro will not be pleased.

If anything ever reached theoretic Earth escape velocity of 24606 miles per hour it would melt from friction before it reached space. Atmosphere supposedly exists 500 miles above the Earth surface, now they say past the Moon .

nasa is full of it, period

Acting as the devil's advocate:
How do you know these moving dots of light have not always been there, and have just been assigned the identities of these satellites and space stations?
Just a point to ponder.

Chemical rocket thrust does not work in the vacuum of space.
Near the Earth, rocket thrust pushes against the atmosphere around the rocket.
In space, rocket thrust pushes against NOTHING.

If Chemical rockets can push against nothing, you should
be able to fly if you pull hard enough on your shoe laces.

No computer or maybe ALL the computers in the world
working together can not resolve a 3 body space problem.

All bodies in the conventionally accepted space model are claimed to be
moving through the universe between 800,000 mph to 2.2 million mph.
No body knows the exact speeds so nobody can calculate the movement
of a third body to go from on moving mass to another moving mass.

I do not KNOW the nature of those lights in the sky.
People through mass indoctrination ASSUME that the lights are
satellites created and launched by man.

Rocket engines don't work the way you suppose. Your whole chain of "reasoning" is false.

Please elaborate.

Oh wait. They haven't. What's going on? Maybe shills don't work on Sundays.

um...


F = d(mv)/dt

then if you have a constant velocity, then yes, force can be simply the rate of change of mass times velocity

go back to high school, OP

OP can't do arithmetic beyond a elementary school level. Rofl.

which just simply ends up being mass flow rate squared in a pipe. This is obviously not true.

explain the lack of arithmetic

They moment robot voice says substitute... They done broke the math. Anyone with a modicum of education should know this.

your right its fake news fuck space fix earth and the ocean fuck space

Why? it's done all the time.

[link to www.khanacademy.org (secure)]

bah, not even worth wasting the time to explain something to a troll, besides, due to the lack of enabled scripts on this site, posting math here is nearly impossible

let us know when you get your Fields or Nobel prize OP

You could do it on a piece of paper and then take a picture.

Great work OP. You can tell you are on the right track because the shills immediately attacked you. Keep it up man!