NASA Thrust Equation gets destroyed.

Where the hell is Astro. Make a fool of this guy

Guess they can't afford shabbos goys anymore.

The fact that it is done in space makes the object being boosted, easier.

I hate an absolutely brilliant and ruthless rebuttal written for this thread.

Sadly it disappeared while I tried to post it

There are only two videos on that YT account.
The other one tries to prove that rockets cannot work in space which is just stupid and wrong.
I assume this one is also stupid and wrong.

But if I thought I could prove this kind of bullshit, I would use my own voice, my real name, and show my face so I got the credit for posterity.

No proof yet? Really doesn’t sound ridiculous when there is no proof of rockets in space

Good work!

Who cares! Is he the thought police?

5 Stars

why would anyone care? nasa lies about literally everything

Nothing can convince the truly and deeply mentally deficients and/or flat Earthers.

But for even marginally intelligent people, there is plenty of proof.

OP, please explain the ISS and other satellites seen in the sky per published sighting schedules....how did they all get up there...and stay up there?

Prove that satellites exist in space and you’re not just seeing a plane flying by.

The "NASA Equation" looked right. v dm/dt is effectively the propulsion force, where v is the speed of fluid exit of the nozzle relative to the rocket body. They should set F on the left side of the equation to zero (out in space there is roughly no net force on the rocket) and solve for the acceleration.

I didn't check whether they did the fluid flow substitutions right.

But at the end of the video she talks about a hole in the side of a vacuum cleaner nozzle. It's more like a rocket if there is no hole in the side. If you put another hole in the side of the pressure vessel that's exhausted out thru the rocket nozzle, you'd lose a lot of thrust too.

Here’s a vid I found inthe comment par of op’s vid

The side hole is the allow the outside air to enter the pipe for continuous pressurization of the pipe as to fill the void created by the vacuum

actually, Technically speaking this whole topic
falls under the domain of Jet Propulsion Theory.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

rockets have taken us to Pluto and beyond.

Theres only one thrust equation to really concern yourself with imho

How many planes do you know of that fly at 400 km up?

Title of this thread should be:

Idiot who has never had trig based general physic courses entertains simpletons with their "genius".

This video will help some of you folks. Listen to the words closely.

Still could be a plane or balloon

typical millenial here in the states. Bunch of idiots

Posted again.

Is glp censoring op’s video.? You know the one in the comment section of the original post video

You didn't actually watch the videos, did you? Planes don't fly at 250 miles up.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

500 Internal Server Error