NASA Thrust Equation gets destroyed.

Pressure difference is how the rocket pushes it out, and how the vacuum cleaner lifts, and how wings and propellers lift. Newton's third law applies to all of them and to gravity.

Chemical rocket thrust does not work in the vacuum of space.
Near the Earth, rocket thrust pushes against the atmosphere around the rocket.
In space, rocket thrust pushes against NOTHING.

If Chemical rockets can push against nothing, you should
be able to fly if you pull hard enough on your shoe laces.

No computer or maybe ALL the computers in the world
working together can not resolve a 3 body space problem.

All bodies in the conventionally accepted space model are claimed to be
moving through the universe between 800,000 mph to 2.2 million mph.
No body knows the exact speeds so nobody can calculate the movement
of a third body to go from on moving mass to another moving mass.

I do not KNOW the nature of those lights in the sky.
People through mass indoctrination ASSUME that the lights are
satellites created and launched by man.

Rocket engines don't work the way you suppose. Your whole chain of "reasoning" is false.

Great work OP. You can tell you are on the right track because the shills immediately attacked you. Keep it up man!

In a vacuum I do not think that you can even have combustion.
Above and below certain saturation levels combustion can not take place depending on the combustible.
And, in a vacuum the molecules do just go away as the molecules of combustion have zero resistance.
The molecules would be absorbed by a vacuum faster than they can be ejected from a rocket engine.

You are all just making assumptions based on
a belief without a verifiable demonstration
Have you ever been shown a demonstration of escaping
gas moving an object in a vacuum chamber?

Also, mathematics can be used to prove a lie as well as the truth.
The experiment claiming to have derived the gravitational constant has
never been successfully duplicated to prove the number is correct.
There has never been an attraction of two bodies in a vacuum observed.

It is in the interests of the ruling class that the peasants do not learn how to think.
That is enough from me trying to cast pearls before swine.

Shouldn't this be pinned until honestly refuted?

Did you take physics in college? I'm thinking NO.

That’s like saying when you spill a cup of water by turning it upside down there is an opposite reaction on the cup

? Water pulls on the earth as the earth pulls on it. Mass attracts mass with gravity.

Ok so no opposite reaction on the cup. Just like pressure gradient force

You guys are getting hung up on pressure gradient force which is a mechanism of thrust. The point is mass is being expelled in a direction and conservation of momentum applies.

This shows that there is no equal and opposite force from gas movement due to pressure gradient force.



Where your proof?

The misunderstandings in this video have been addressed over and over in these threads. It is wrong. Newton's third law and conservation of momentum applies to gravity, buoyancy, and pressure gradient force. It's just the creator of the video can't correctly identify them.

Where is it addressed? Where is the equal and opposite reaction from movement due to gravity, buoyancy And pressure gradient force?

You keep saying you have addressed the issue but you haven’t

Where is it addressed? Where is the equal and opposite reaction from movement due to gravity, buoyancy And pressure gradient force?

You keep saying you have addressed the issue but you haven’t

Yes it does because it shows that the NASA thrust equation is simply stating mass flow rate is force. This is wrong.

Aren't you the one that started a thread on that video? Look in the thread. No matter what is said (again), you would still say it wasn't addressed.

Anyway, with gravity, the object and the earth are each exerting a force of gravity on the other.

With buoyancy, weight is transferred to the object floating up from the water it was displacing. It is correct no external change in weight should show on the scale.

Pressure gradient force can cause movement of a fluid mass having momentum which is conserved meaning that momentum will be transferred to another mass in contact, like a rocket.

Here's something that maybe, just maybe you'll understand....


Since you like FE university of youtube, Explain the movement of the water hose........

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



Any objective person will conclude the flow of water is causing opposite reaction force that makes the hose move. Mass flow rate is force. This is high school physics.

It’s pushing off the air just like a rocket in atmosphere

Utter complete Bullsh!t.

1 gallon of air(at sea level) is about 0.09 lbs.

1 gallon of water is about 9.0 lbs.

The molecular density/mass of water is 100 times that of air. Pushing against air is insignificant and immaterial.

If rocket thrust was from pushing off air, the forward air résistance would cancel that out.

Get a high school physics book and READ IT!

Just fucking kill yorself already, cunt!

Why do people compare a vacuum tube to space..
The hose of a cleaner is not a vacuum, there is one behind constantly created behind the filter in the grab bag..

ISS just a projector mounted on a plane.

Wrong.