Tomorrow's SDO Eclipse

It's not a lunar eclipse nor can it be seen from earth's surface. This is happening due to SDO's orbit around the earth and it can only be seen from SDO's perspective.

You'll be able to watch it happening live here:
[link to sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]

Oh ok ty :)

News to me.

I didn't realize the Bible Predicted the path of a Solar Dynamics Satellite in relation to the sun's position and earths orbital mechanics.

Those guys that wrote the Bible out in a Desert knew stuff.

Considering this source of this is a guy with a history of posting questionable material.... can you prove your math wasn't just lifted from NASA?

Sure looks like somebody has an inside source too... this guy literally posts the same exact shit as NASA just right before they post the same info.

Fucking fishy.

Why do you advertise for NASA if you do not have a contract with them?

Long ago Nancy uploaded a photo of your contract with NASA and you banned her....why?

I do not work for NASA and I do point out when they get it wrong.
Thread: If my prediction holds true, NASA is going to be wrong about March 2, 2019

No, she didn't. Let's see that photo, it doesn't exist.

No, I didn't. She left because she couldn't handle the criticism. I wasn't a mod back then either, I couldn't have banned her.

The most vocal group along this path are the paid debunkers, those who denounced Zeta Talk with insults and lies, denying the public the truth. They were not covered under the National Security Directive, so like Nancy and others telling the truth, could have chosen a different path.

Astro, why do you play innocent? We know you are wrong about nibiru. All of these bullshit threads you post are an attempt to build fake credibility so that the uneducated can follow your words blindly confident in your academic prowess. You are far too clear. Notice you have yet to explain the disturbance of Jupiters center of rotation. Notice you fail to address the verified existence of our sun's twin. You only care to build up a false sense of authority among the dolts here. Do you have a legitimate degree? Somehow, it seems unlikely your NASA stipend would cover a phd.

your code is "buggy"

line 131-136 lol

What "questionable material" have I posted?

As previously stated, my source code is right here:
[link to github.com (secure)]
No, it's not "lifted from NASA." You can find the same equations I used in a variety of books going back decades having nothing to do with NASA. For reference:
[link to catalog.hathitrust.org (secure)]
[link to www.cambridge.org (secure)]

In fact I even generated this prediction using my own observations of the SDO spacecraft.

The resulting astrometric measurements and orbital data are available right here:
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]

This prediction was made independent of NASA using my own observations and software.

Another thing astro does by pushing this bullshit like he figured shit out is to con the reader into trusting him.

Astro has to this day never once answered a simple question about the LM not having enough power to pull off the moon landing.

The 65kW-h of power maximum would run out after only 16.25 hours, not the 35hour stay.

To transfer analog video on Earth for 60 miles, 3kW is required, the LM had a max usage of 4kW

There was not enough room for the batteries, batteries were too small.

Yet astro will ignore this simple fact. What's new?

So you use other people equations?
Why are you not creating your own work you sponge?

Yes, I do see a mistake that was on line 131 saving the x coordinate where it should have saved the y coordinate, but it doesn't affect anything as the coordinates are re-computed correctly anyway when actually generating the prediction videos. Thanks though, I corrected the error.

Last Edited by Astromut on 03/05/2019 12:47 PM

This is my work. The math doesn't change just because other people have done it for decades. What kind of fucking idiot insists that people stop using equations if someone else already used the same equation?

People that post acronyms are just annoying.

What the F is an SDO?

That's why they pay me the BIG MONEY lol

Best do another run-through. There are other mistakes as well. I believe you will arrive at a different result when they are corrected.

Kudos for your effort however. You are clearly not the fraud/dolt the other poster from Japan claimed.

Solar Dynamics Observatory

A hoax mission by NASA as part of the fake Living With a Star program.

Of course this "doctor" is a NASA insider and sucks them off all the time.

He has photos that NASA has never even released of the apollo hoax. I bet he doesnt have the balls to ever leak those pics again.

Thank you. Solar Dynamics Observatory should have been in the original post along with a description of what it is.

That was a great thread. You nailed the prediction using your software. I wonder if in the future NASA will be asking you for it. But I suppose since github is free and opensource, they can just download it. You should make them buy it :D

You, sir or madam, are clearly a LATENT HOMOSEXUAL. Please feel free to de-closet at your earliest convenience.

As to your comments, I agree the code isn't well done. If you bothered to look, I pointed out one of his errors, which he corrected, and alerted him that there are others.

All this was taking place while you were fondling yourself looking at pictures of Michael Jackson's chimp Bubbles.

Nothing you said in this post has anything to do with the subject of this thread. I assume you're pulling numbers from this document?
[link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)]
4 kW of power "max," so why would you idiotically assume they would have all systems running at max power throughout the lunar stay? You think they need to leave the landing and rendezvous radars on while landed? Or the lights and all the life support running while out on EVA?

The descent stage had 5 batteries at 400 amp-hours each, and without the radars and other needless equipment running the LM consumed about 55 amps of power. 2000/55 = 36.4 hours and that's not accounting for not needing life support to run during EVA. During transit to the moon the lunar module received power from the command module's fuel cells.

Learn how to actually calculate a link budget.
Thread: Do you trust the Pluto images to be real? Here is what I don't. (Page 6)

Feel free to submit pull requests via github. I guarantee my result will be accurate as it has been throughout the spring eclipse season. See for example:
Thread: If my prediction holds true, NASA is going to be wrong about March 2, 2019 (Page 5)

Ok, I'm not a professional programmer, but that's way the fuck over the line. You're done here.

So you remember this video then?

Yes, I had photos in my personal collection some of which had not yet been digitized and released on any of NASA's sites at the time. What exactly are you claiming is wrong with any of those images?

To re-iterate, I am not a professional programmer. I'm entirely self-taught when it comes to Python and I learn as I go. As you know though, I'm open to making corrections to the code and that's why it's open source. I'll eat my hat though if the eclipse does not happen tomorrow the way my program predicts. I should also point out that the annotation fork of the program is extremely outdated; I now use the raw FITS files and the embedded header data to generate the annotated videos rather than trying to use Tesseract to do OCR recognition of the embedded time stamps on the processed video frames. That was an ugly solution, the new one's much better.

cool

Point taken.

And the coding isn't bad for a first pass effort. I understand that isn't your core strength. You have to understand coders are as passionate about their craft as "rocket scientists" are theirs...and just as territorial lol

NASA plane forced to abort takeoff from Ellington Airport; no one hurt

[link to www.khou.com (secure)]