Globe Earth debunked | |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/13/2019 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1732284 And your evidence for this? Apart from YouTube vids from your fellow dimwits? My eyes, binoculars, and the ability to factor math that requires 8 inches per mile squared to be the curvature of Earth as it is described to us. And is required by the size and model we are taught. And yes, the cardboard covered in tin foil Moon Lander does factor Why do you have to lie, Fluffy McDumbshit? We all know that you have the intellect of a paper towel. Sure. Your inquisitive nature and willingness to check your paradigm are clearly indicative of a diminished mental capacity on my part. Wow. Brilliance, in all it's glory. Oh the hypocrisy of the person who admits they have me on ignore. |
Fluffy Pancakes User ID: 77376617 United States 03/13/2019 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! Things are bad enough, there is no need to make anything up. ~Fluffy "Never interrupt an enemy in the process of destroying himself." Quercitin and zinc...Get it. Take it. Visit howbad.info...If you took the shot, for sure. |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/13/2019 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! You're free to respond there and prove the analysis wrong if you think you can, but I doubt you will since you can't even handle my posts without putting me on ignore. But don't worry, I'm about to stop posting on all of these kinds of threads forever. I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77141943 United States 03/13/2019 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flat earthers are so dumb, Where is your actual real evidence from your own satilite to prove the world is flat? Where is your evidence if ya think NASA is lieing about the globe Earth, Also one more thing flat Earth tards why don't people sail off the edge of the eart as they would if the Earth was flat? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1732284 United States 03/13/2019 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! Fluffy McDumbshit, are you related to a former GLPer who went by Tampa Heather? She was batshit insane and dumber than a bucket of wet hair. I think she finally got involuntary committed, but your posts remind me of her. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1732284 United States 03/13/2019 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77443056 Canada 03/13/2019 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
syncro User ID: 75835116 United States 03/13/2019 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ball Master User ID: 77455278 United States 03/13/2019 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't need an equation to show that "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In fact, having an equation can confuse the issue, because the equation may pertain to an issue not related to the action reaction principle. |
Fluffy Pancakes User ID: 77376617 United States 03/14/2019 12:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! You're free to respond there and prove the analysis wrong if you think you can, but I doubt you will since you can't even handle my posts without putting me on ignore. But don't worry, I'm about to stop posting on all of these kinds of threads forever. I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. Astro, I clicked on it. If it helps, Timur with however many numbers and Shoesy are the only others I have on ignore. I truly do not personally hate, despise, or find you to be inhuman. Just that you are are a religious fanatic about "space", which, to me...is highly questionable. I know it's kind of a a GLP death sentence to put a moderator on ignore. When I did it, I had little room for BS. It ebbs and flows, savvy? You're not an ass, and I do not "hate" on you, I just cannot ascribe to your theology, which is truthfully how it presents when confronted with "proofs" people can ascertain for themselves from their own locations. Is, or is not the trig necessary for the curve required to manifest at it's purported value accurate? The size of the sphere required for the day/night and seasons needs to approach 24,900 miles in circumference. Plus or minus 2 to 5% is fine with me. I do realize no one can run a tape around the circumference, and I don't require that. What is intriguing is the FE model has the circumference of the Equator. That the curve necessary for the globe model, is NOT apparent nor proven in any way except for on paper by the globe model. And, ultimately, that people who are so solidly in the globe camp are so freaking hostile about questioning it. I mean, I didn't make it, and YOU didn't, so why the anger? Why the "you're a fucking moron for questioning it"? Shoot. We've been lied to about almost everything. What people can actually put into question themselves and things they can actually measure, view, and contemplate might be okay? Show me the curve or a non CGI vid of the Earth rotating, and I will be still...It shouldn't be that hard if it is so obvious. Things are bad enough, there is no need to make anything up. ~Fluffy "Never interrupt an enemy in the process of destroying himself." Quercitin and zinc...Get it. Take it. Visit howbad.info...If you took the shot, for sure. |
Fluffy Pancakes User ID: 77376617 United States 03/14/2019 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! Fluffy McDumbshit, are you related to a former GLPer who went by Tampa Heather? She was batshit insane and dumber than a bucket of wet hair. I think she finally got involuntary committed, but your posts remind me of her. If you have any actual thoughts, they might be worth considering. Last Edited by Fluffy Pancakes on 03/14/2019 12:08 AM Things are bad enough, there is no need to make anything up. ~Fluffy "Never interrupt an enemy in the process of destroying himself." Quercitin and zinc...Get it. Take it. Visit howbad.info...If you took the shot, for sure. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70934338 United States 03/14/2019 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Where is the curve? User ID: 19353379 United States 03/14/2019 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flat earthers are so dumb, Where is your actual real evidence from your own satilite to prove the world is flat? Where is your evidence if ya think NASA is lieing about the globe Earth, Also one more thing flat Earth tards why don't people sail off the edge of the eart as they would if the Earth was flat? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77141943 weak sauce globe tard |
74444 User ID: 74444 United States 03/14/2019 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ball Master User ID: 77455278 United States 03/14/2019 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: syncro In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! You're free to respond there and prove the analysis wrong if you think you can, but I doubt you will since you can't even handle my posts without putting me on ignore. But don't worry, I'm about to stop posting on all of these kinds of threads forever. I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. Astro, I clicked on it. If it helps, Timur with however many numbers and Shoesy are the only others I have on ignore. I truly do not personally hate, despise, or find you to be inhuman. Just that you are are a religious fanatic about "space", which, to me...is highly questionable. I know it's kind of a a GLP death sentence to put a moderator on ignore. When I did it, I had little room for BS. It ebbs and flows, savvy? You're not an ass, and I do not "hate" on you, I just cannot ascribe to your theology, which is truthfully how it presents when confronted with "proofs" people can ascertain for themselves from their own locations. Is, or is not the trig necessary for the curve required to manifest at it's purported value accurate? The size of the sphere required for the day/night and seasons needs to approach 24,900 miles in circumference. Plus or minus 2 to 5% is fine with me. I do realize no one can run a tape around the circumference, and I don't require that. What is intriguing is the FE model has the circumference of the Equator. That the curve necessary for the globe model, is NOT apparent nor proven in any way except for on paper by the globe model. And, ultimately, that people who are so solidly in the globe camp are so freaking hostile about questioning it. I mean, I didn't make it, and YOU didn't, so why the anger? Why the "you're a fucking moron for questioning it"? Shoot. We've been lied to about almost everything. What people can actually put into question themselves and things they can actually measure, view, and contemplate might be okay? Show me the curve or a non CGI vid of the Earth rotating, and I will be still...It shouldn't be that hard if it is so obvious. What about sunsets? |
Remedial_Rebel User ID: 77275768 United States 03/14/2019 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes This is like asking why if you know basic first aid why you're not qualified for heart surgery. You ignored the fact the Dr. John D's has NO researchable credentials. Again NO! reputable/researchable scientist or engineer on earth supports FE!!!! Further you are ignoring my basic statement that FE can not explain basic daylight observations for all inhabited places on earth all 365 days of the year. BTW, spherical earth, with 23 degree tilt of axis, in a heliocentric solar systems explains daylight hours with no exceptions. |
Remedial_Rebel User ID: 77275768 United States 03/14/2019 01:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm about to stop posting on all of these kinds of threads forever. I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. Quoting: Dr. Deplorable Astromut Don't give up now, we're winning the war against the darkness of ignorance. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77454208 United Kingdom 03/14/2019 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75714823 Australia 03/14/2019 05:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd actually like to know why one would think that a certified scientist is the only one that can take videos with an infrared camera and have it be acceptable. What is the logic behind that? Seriously. Quoting: Fluffy Pancakes In the link that Astro posted, that JTolan's own footage proves spherical earth has nothing to do with infrared. Sensationalism aside, he is showing only a top part of the mountain range in accordance with the curvature of the earth. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Meta bunk has been subjected a lot of meta debunking. But I will check it. Thanks! You're free to respond there and prove the analysis wrong if you think you can, but I doubt you will since you can't even handle my posts without putting me on ignore. But don't worry, I'm about to stop posting on all of these kinds of threads forever. I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. Sit, Drop, Stay, good boy.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73852158 United States 03/14/2019 05:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77455063 Canada 03/14/2019 06:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't need an equation to show that "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In fact, having an equation can confuse the issue, because the equation may pertain to an issue not related to the action reaction principle. Does math confuse you? Perhaps rocket science isn’t your thing. As for “every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction” You are saying that a person that weighs 75kg is deadlifting 100kg and he drops it from a height. Did the person get lifted off the ground? Because that’s basically what you are saying |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77027273 United States 03/14/2019 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't need an equation to show that "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In fact, having an equation can confuse the issue, because the equation may pertain to an issue not related to the action reaction principle. Does math confuse you? Perhaps rocket science isn’t your thing. As for “every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction” You are saying that a person that weighs 75kg is deadlifting 100kg and he drops it from a height. Did the person get lifted off the ground? Because that’s basically what you are saying To lift himself off the ground he would have to apply 75kg of force against the floor. Dropping a 100kg barbell doesn't count because once it is dropped, it is free from his body. Of course when the barbell hit the floor it will bounce because every action has an equal and opposite reaction. try it sometime, just don't hit your toes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77027273 United States 03/14/2019 06:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77339822 United States 03/14/2019 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A spinning water ball Earth in a vacuum is beyond the pale of nonsense. Earth not a globe. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73852158 Ever seen what water does in a no gravity environment? Yeah... It forms a round ball. And if you set it spinning, it keeps spinning. You flat earth morons are the DUMBEST motherfuckers on this globe. I'm so sick of this demonically and CIA inspired garbage, if anyone ever spews this bullshit in my presence, I'll probably punch their fucking lights out. |
Ball Master User ID: 77437387 United States 03/14/2019 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A spinning water ball Earth in a vacuum is beyond the pale of nonsense. Earth not a globe. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73852158 Ever seen what water does in a no gravity environment? Yeah... It forms a round ball. And if you set it spinning, it keeps spinning. You flat earth morons are the DUMBEST motherfuckers on this globe. I'm so sick of this demonically and CIA inspired garbage, if anyone ever spews this bullshit in my presence, I'll probably punch their fucking lights out. The C-eye-A is probably the origin of the popularity of Flat Earth, and probably does shill for Flat Earth. |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/14/2019 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77433193 Canada 03/14/2019 07:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/14/2019 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You don't need an equation to show that "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". In fact, having an equation can confuse the issue, because the equation may pertain to an issue not related to the action reaction principle. Does math confuse you? Perhaps rocket science isn’t your thing. As for “every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction” You are saying that a person that weighs 75kg is deadlifting 100kg and he drops it from a height. Did the person get lifted off the ground? Because that’s basically what you are saying Vacuuming a hole in the side of a tube on earth isn't proving the math of spaceflight wrong, it's just demonstrating a massive ignorance of force vectors. As is your example. What is the velocity of the weight the moment he lets go? 0 m/s. Doesn't matter if it accelerates to the ground after that, the velocity of the mass was nil when it left his hands. You don't even understand how f=ma works. |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/14/2019 07:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Deplorable Astromut Senior Forum Moderator 03/14/2019 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'll be staying to my own threads from now on and you won't have to be bothered by all these "hidden posts" you can't handle, except for my threads. Quoting: Dr. Deplorable Astromut Awwwww... It's for a good reason, a very positive thing has come up but I won't be able to reveal what it is for quite a while. You guys keep fighting the good fight though. |