Globe Earth debunked

Of course my assertion is supported....you think not, prove it.
Prove it..go on prove me wrong by showing me a contradiction.....not imagine this, presuppose that, this indicates that and therefore the earth is a ball.

Tangible proofs like I asked for at the very start.

I am sure that you can quantify mathematically the force due to the "pushing off that metal frame", btw. not a frame but a wire with a diameter of about 1mm.

I am also sure that you can explain, why the acceleration in the second experiment, with the same setup but the tube under atmospheric pressure, is the same though the rocket is, in addition to the "frame", "pushing" against the air.

.

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

Globe earth is an idea, with no proof or evidence.



let the nonsensical excuses begin...……………..

If it can push of air, it definitely can push off a solid wire. Pushing off solid is more effective. See

I asked for the mathematical quantification of the force .... not some dumbass comments from someone whose ancestors already knew more than 2000 years ago that the earth is a sphere.

But what can we expect from someone who is not able to set a link to a RubeTube video (I fixed it) and verify if it works.


Btw.: I don't see any vacuum in that video, just some drawings from an imbecile who thinks he is a rocket scientist.

.

OP, you need to do the following:

1. Stop eating stupid for breakfast.
2. Stop vomiting your breakfast all over the internet.

Thanks

I didn’t see you provide any proof. At least he disproved your fallacy

10 pages and yet not one tangible measurement to back up the claim the earth is spherical.

10 pages and yet not one tangible measurement to back up the claim the earth is spherical.

No metal frame, no apparatus at all, just a rocket working in space:

Measurements made from the video indicate that the booster is above the Karman line and in space during the boostback burn. My telescope has an altitude dial on the side which was previously recorded using a gopro during launch. From my launch viewing site, the telescope is angled up about 40 degrees above the horizon during the boostback burn. This sped-up video is zoomed in the altitude dial, apologies the resolution isn't good enough to read the numbers but you can see where the numbers are marked and they're in 10 degree increments, the video starts at launch (0 degrees) and ends at the end of the boostback burn (40 degrees):
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
At launch the Falcon boosters are about 22 pixels wide in my camera:
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
I'm 21.1 km from the launch site and the boosters are each 3.7 meters wide, so that corresponds to an angular size of 0.01 degrees. By the end of the boostback they're only about 3.2 pixels wide:
[link to drive.google.com (secure)]
Given that we know from the launch that a 3.7 meter wide booster is 22 pixels wide in the view from 21.1 km, that means a pixel size of 3.2 pixels corresponds to an angular size of about 0.00146 degrees. The range between my telescope and the booster is therefore about 145 km at that time. Given that it's about 40 degrees above the horizon, then even if we assume a flat earth the altitude above the ground of the booster was roughly 122 km. Let's be generous here and say I could be about 5 degrees off on either side of that 40 degree measurement. Even at 35 degrees above the horizon the altitude (even assuming a flat earth) would be 102 km. At 45 degrees it would of course be 145 km above the earth. So it was somewhere between about 102 - 145 km in altitude, above the Karman line and in space. My video indicates it had no trouble reversing course to come back and land near the launch site. Please show your evidence that the video indicates it was not in space.

[link to j.gifs.com (secure)]

Yep! There's nothing like a tangible measurement to back up your claims......and that is nothing like a tangible measurement!
Get a grip ya clown.

Yep! There's nothing like a tangible measurement to back up your claims......and that is nothing like a tangible measurement!
Get a grip ya clown.

Those wind turbines are 195 meters tall, and the camera is 29 miles away.

lol..you seem to be pretty fucking stupid for a self-proclaimed "smart guy"
Tangible it ain't - in fact it is about as tangible as your stupid little animation is practical.

You roid raging again Del? Those are empirical measurements and they not only prove you wrong, they prove the radius of the earth. How sad for you.

Biceps and pecs isn't caused by steroids lardy arse, you could try and work out instead of eating shite all day. You wanna talk about that?

Intelligence is?.....
Tangible proof = a shitty video
Practical demonstration = a shitty video
No it fucking isn't

How sad indeed, how sad for me that I am surrounded by loons and idiots like you who accept ideological bullshit over common sense and direct reality.

How come that you only post on weekends, never during school hours and never after the time, when mummies usually send their 11 year old monkeys into bed.

Thus may I remind you at GLP's ToS:
"... the godlikeproductions Website is not intended for children under 18. If you are under 18 years of age, then please do not use the godlikeproductions Website .... Talk to your parents about what sites are appropriate for you."

.

Biceps and pecs isn't caused by steroids lardy arse, you could try and work out instead of eating shite all day. You wanna talk about that?

Intelligence is?.....
Tangible proof = a shitty video
Practical demonstration = a shitty video
No it fucking isn't

How sad indeed, how sad for me that I am surrounded by loons and idiots like you who accept ideological bullshit over common sense and direct reality.