WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77456944 United States 03/14/2019 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77404219 United States 03/14/2019 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75268697 United Kingdom 03/14/2019 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" You say they don't answer, but then you say they give you two answers. Which one is it. Also, not voting doesn't give a single vote for anyone. Your logic, or attempt at it, presumes that not getting a vote is the same as losing a vote to your opponent. Did you fail maths, by any chance? If I don't buy an orange at a store, it doesn't mean someone else get it for free. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77404219 United States 03/14/2019 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" You say they don't answer, but then you say they give you two answers. Which one is it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75268697 Also, not voting doesn't give a single vote for anyone. Your logic, or attempt at it, presumes that not getting a vote is the same as losing a vote to your opponent. Did you fail maths, by any chance? If I don't buy an orange at a store, it doesn't mean someone else get it for free. I am giving you the two answers I ALWAYS get. NOT voting is effectively casting a vote for the opponent. All Libs should try it in 2020 if you want to test that theory. |
Watch this (OP) User ID: 77404219 United States 03/14/2019 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75268697 United Kingdom 03/14/2019 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" You say they don't answer, but then you say they give you two answers. Which one is it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75268697 Also, not voting doesn't give a single vote for anyone. Your logic, or attempt at it, presumes that not getting a vote is the same as losing a vote to your opponent. Did you fail maths, by any chance? If I don't buy an orange at a store, it doesn't mean someone else get it for free. I am giving you the two answers I ALWAYS get. NOT voting is effectively casting a vote for the opponent. All Libs should try it in 2020 if you want to test that theory. No it isn't. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77404219 United States 03/14/2019 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" You say they don't answer, but then you say they give you two answers. Which one is it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75268697 Also, not voting doesn't give a single vote for anyone. Your logic, or attempt at it, presumes that not getting a vote is the same as losing a vote to your opponent. Did you fail maths, by any chance? If I don't buy an orange at a store, it doesn't mean someone else get it for free. I am giving you the two answers I ALWAYS get. NOT voting is effectively casting a vote for the opponent. All Libs should try it in 2020 if you want to test that theory. No it isn't. No third-party candidate has ever won the presidency. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75268697 United Kingdom 03/14/2019 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" You say they don't answer, but then you say they give you two answers. Which one is it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75268697 Also, not voting doesn't give a single vote for anyone. Your logic, or attempt at it, presumes that not getting a vote is the same as losing a vote to your opponent. Did you fail maths, by any chance? If I don't buy an orange at a store, it doesn't mean someone else get it for free. I am giving you the two answers I ALWAYS get. NOT voting is effectively casting a vote for the opponent. All Libs should try it in 2020 if you want to test that theory. No it isn't. No third-party candidate has ever won the presidency. Who said third party. I am talking about not voting anyone being a viable option. Third party... I don't have the time to explain. See here for the elementary logic. [link to reformedlayman.wordpress.com (secure)] |
AxX User ID: 75450217 United States 03/14/2019 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Q: Should I pick Red or Blue? A: Don't pick! Although technically an answer, it's not a relevant answer to the question being asked. Which one should be picked? One WILL be picked, which should it be? "NOT PICKING" is NOT an valid answer to the OP's question. Energy flows where focus goes. [25/77/19] Rev 3:9 <-- Wonder who these guys are? “The future’s uncertain and The End is always near!” - Jim Morrison, 1970 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77404219 United States 03/14/2019 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Q: Should I pick Red or Blue? Quoting: AxX A: Don't pick! Although technically an answer, it's not a relevant answer to the question being asked. Which one should be picked? One WILL be picked, which should it be? "NOT PICKING" is NOT an valid answer to the OP's question. I would be damned if I threw my vote away and Hillary won. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76819210 United States 03/14/2019 04:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” ( - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76819210 United States 03/14/2019 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) it does not matter the CFR wins if you vote for trump or hillary or whichever candidates tey give you the CFR runs the US and allows the dipshit masses to choose between one of their two pre-selected puppets vote for trump = cfr vote for hillary = cfr in 2020, vote for trump = cfr vote for democrat = cfr the whole purpose of presidential elections is to give the illusion you have a choice and that presidents are in charge you do not have a choice, you always get a cfr puppet and presidents are not in charge, they are replaceable cfr puppets |
rosicrucian1 User ID: 77392165 Canada 03/14/2019 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) then there is always the trite: they are all the same your vote doesn't matter why bother the elites control them all anyways and on and on... in their world unless you are a commie you should just put a shot gun in your mouth and.. “the devil is a foe to the blood” Prof. Minor |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75523550 United States 03/14/2019 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) I've said it a million times since 2015. Trump was the only option and IS the only option. The alternative was Hillary, put Trump in for second term and get control of congress back from the Demonrats or suffer the consequences. The deck is so stacked against any real third party alternative that a vote for them would've been a votre for Hillary and voting third party in 2020 is a vote for the Democrats. The idea was to throw a wrench into the works and fuck up the Globalist agenda. Stick with it or brace yourselves for doom. Real fucking doom the likes of which hasn't been seen since the Communists took over eastern Europe and Hitler rose to power. You've been warned by countless on this board, on others and in real life off the internet. Stick with Trump or die, frankly I don't give a rats ass anymore and I seriously doubt I'm the only who's ready to circle the wagons and let it burn. You better believe, we stop voting, we stop giving a shit and look out for our own and it will burn. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76819210 United States 03/14/2019 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) then there is always the trite: they are all the same your vote doesn't matter why bother the elites control them all anyways and on and on... in their world unless you are a commie you should just put a shot gun in your mouth and.. that trite exists because the elite admitted to it: “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77455400 United States 03/14/2019 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rosicrucian1 User ID: 77392165 Canada 03/14/2019 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) then there is always the trite: they are all the same your vote doesn't matter why bother the elites control them all anyways and on and on... in their world unless you are a commie you should just put a shot gun in your mouth and.. that trite exists because the elite admitted to it: “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966 Carrol Quibley was a NWO socialist... notice how he wanted RINO's and Socialists to run things eg. both parties are the same... we shifted leftward each day, month and year since end of WWII... I advocate for more distance between political parties, for more choice and more chance of policy differentiation in order to find solutions to real problems. Quigley and I would be in a lot of arguments. “the devil is a foe to the blood” Prof. Minor |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73970136 Russia 03/14/2019 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Convinced more than ever that Trump was deliberate and necessary in order to: - Destroy any hope of the right and the idea of Republicans running the show anymore, when the reality is, there is one party and one agenda who controls Washington, D.C. - To ferret out any TRUE patriots who might be a threat to their ultimate goal - To further protect Hillary, Obama and other key players from the fallout of the economy and other key political issues which are yet to unfold in 2019/2020 - An increase of propaganda and hate division between the masses in the country, dividing U.S. citizens from coming together to stage a Civil War as is now necessary It's all staged. It's all b.s.. It's all theater. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77454806 United States 03/14/2019 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vicious Deplorable dollop You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 49779451 United States 03/14/2019 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WHy can a Trump hater never answer this? "WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR?" "WHO SHOULD WE HAVE VOTED FOR?" Their answers are always, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77404219 A. Third party (A vote for the DNC) B. No one (A vote for the DNC) They're a bunch of pussies. Last Edited by Vicious Deplorable dollop on 03/14/2019 05:22 PM Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |