People do some really funny math when they divide up the American public or imagine people fighting to either defend themselves from foreign invasion or even an inside civil war.

The United States has approximately 1.3 million active-duty troops, with another 865,000 in reserve, one of the largest fighting forces of any country by 2017 figures.

That's formally trained, occupation soldier.

HOWEVER, China or India could EASILY eclipse this, with populations well over a billion people each. China could probably get together an easy 20, even 50 million, to invade our country by way of transport ships, easily.

Of the viable and able bodied citizens of the U.S. who could fight in the civilian sector, you'd have to eliminate most children 10 and under, as well as any adult with a handicap, debilitating illness or old age.

Of that remaining number, you'd have to break down the demographics of those willing to fight (foreign or domestic threats) so as to subdivide the boundaries and divisions by race/ethnicity, social status, demographic/region and political affiliation.

Really stop to consider this for a moment.

Is some guy from NJ really going to care about your land in Minnesota or Kentucky if it's a civil war... especially if you aren't of the same mindset or political bend as him? Does that value and dedication to protect one another change when it's a foreign threat and now it's about the loss of a nation, not a state, instead?

Yeah, what's coming down the line is going to be fraught with mis/disinformation to further fragment society as we know it.

It will start as a civil war first, to wear us down and deplete our resources, followed by a foreign invasion thereafter. That's where the movie 'Red Dawn' had it all wrong.

I know this because I know what is planned, almost to the date. And that only changes based on a few variables because of statistics which are constantly changing and so maximum yield/success rate can be achieved.