PIN AND UNPIN THREADS: Put it in the hands of the people!!! | |
THE DOOM User ID: 209204 Australia 06/16/2007 04:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sigma User ID: 250561 United States 06/16/2007 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I HAVE a pin/unpin button on every thread. This would never fly because people would reboot and continuously vote until there were 60 Ron Paul threads. Seriously, what are you going to do when 60 threads are "voted" to be pinned and then decide enough is enough? Try to talk everyone in to voting to unpin some? Come on, think it through. ..|.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21470 United States 06/16/2007 04:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I HAVE a pin/unpin button on every thread. This would never fly because people would reboot and continuously vote until there were 60 Ron Paul threads. Seriously, what are you going to do when 60 threads are "voted" to be pinned and then decide enough is enough? Try to talk everyone in to voting to unpin some? Come on, think it through. Quoting: SigmaIt would work if IP addresses on the votes were recorded. Whoever programs the system could make it so that you can't vote on pinning and unpinning threads when you're using a proxy server. As long as the system was making sure that each IP address could vote only and that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server, spamming threads would be impossible, each person could only vote once. |
Sigma User ID: 250561 United States 06/16/2007 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I HAVE a pin/unpin button on every thread. This would never fly because people would reboot and continuously vote until there were 60 Ron Paul threads. Seriously, what are you going to do when 60 threads are "voted" to be pinned and then decide enough is enough? Try to talk everyone in to voting to unpin some? Come on, think it through. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 192293It would work if IP addresses on the votes were recorded. Whoever programs the system could make it so that you can't vote on pinning and unpinning threads when you're using a proxy server. As long as the system was making sure that each IP address could vote only and that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server, spamming threads would be impossible, each person could only vote once. There are lots of dial up users here, as evidenced from threads about ISP's, and I have DSL and can change my IP by clicking on some settings from my ISP. You're not being logical, you also ignored what I said about what happens when you have 60 pinned threads? You aren't even registered I'm assuming since you are posting as an AC. If you register you can add threads you like to a favorites list anyway. Maybe you could try that instead of pushing an agenda. ..|.. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^ Again, the system would need to do two things: 1. the system would need to ensure that each IP address could vote only once 2. the system would need to ensure that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server If the system did these two things, everyone would only be able to vote once from a particular IP. Therefore, spamming the system would be impossible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 227636 United States 06/16/2007 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I HAVE a pin/unpin button on every thread. This would never fly because people would reboot and continuously vote until there were 60 Ron Paul threads. Seriously, what are you going to do when 60 threads are "voted" to be pinned and then decide enough is enough? Try to talk everyone in to voting to unpin some? Come on, think it through. Quoting: SigmaIt would work if IP addresses on the votes were recorded. Whoever programs the system could make it so that you can't vote on pinning and unpinning threads when you're using a proxy server. As long as the system was making sure that each IP address could vote only and that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server, spamming threads would be impossible, each person could only vote once. There are lots of dial up users here, as evidenced from threads about ISP's, and I have DSL and can change my IP by clicking on some settings from my ISP. You're not being logical, you also ignored what I said about what happens when you have 60 pinned threads? You aren't even registered I'm assuming since you are posting as an AC. If you register you can add threads you like to a favorites list anyway. Maybe you could try that instead of pushing an agenda. We could go back to the old way it used to be where a whole range of IPs couldn't vote again after one vote had been received in a particular thread (for example, if a vote was received from 120.40.4.43, no more votes could excepted from 120.40.x.x). |
Sigma User ID: 250561 United States 06/16/2007 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 192293Again, the system would need to do two things: 1. the system would need to ensure that each IP address could vote only once 2. the system would need to ensure that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server If the system did these two things, everyone would only be able to vote once from a particular IP. Therefore, spamming the system would be impossible. Yes and you're not understanding: 1. Dial up users can reboot and are assigned a new IP, which is what the 1-star people are famous for doing, so they can vote over and over. 2. Even with my DSL I can change my IP with a few clicks. I'm not arguing about it. Ask Trinity or Sergio. Good luck, lol. ..|.. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Stasis User ID: 251960 United States 06/16/2007 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it would be a nightmare. Maybe pages and pages of pinned, useless threads. I like the idea that those threads that interest us could be voted to be pinned, eventually, but everyone here has such diverse interests. And then there are the trolls. 10 threads about poo pinned just for shits and giggles (pun intended). You can't have a light without a dark to stick it in. -- Arlo Guthrie Your friend is the man who knows all about you, and still likes you. -- Elbert Hubbard |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^^^ Quoting: SigmaAgain, the system would need to do two things: 1. the system would need to ensure that each IP address could vote only once 2. the system would need to ensure that you can't vote if you're using a proxy server If the system did these two things, everyone would only be able to vote once from a particular IP. Therefore, spamming the system would be impossible. Yes and you're not understanding: 1. Dial up users can reboot and are assigned a new IP, which is what the 1-star people are famous for doing, so they can vote over and over. 2. Even with my DSL I can change my IP with a few clicks. I'm not arguing about it. Ask Trinity or Sergio. Good luck, lol. You're right, I'm sorry for being ignorant. Two other ways to do this come to mind though. 1. Only paid users could vote on pinning and unpinning threads. Trinity originally said that paid users would be able to pin a certain number of threads each month, is that still in effect? Allowing paid members to vote on pinning and unpinning threads would be good for business because people would probably pay $10 a month just to have the ability to vote on pinning and unpinning threads. This would be an incredible advertising point for GLP. This idea would take care of the spamming problem because each paid user would only be allowed one vote and that's easy to check. 2. We could go back to the old way it used to be where a whole range of IPs couldn't vote again after one vote had been received in a particular thread (for example, if a vote was received from 120.40.4.43, no more votes could excepted from 120.40.x.x). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 227636 United States 06/16/2007 04:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 04:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it would be a nightmare. Maybe pages and pages of pinned, useless threads. I like the idea that those threads that interest us could be voted to be pinned, eventually, but everyone here has such diverse interests. Quoting: StasisAnd then there are the trolls. 10 threads about poo pinned just for shits and giggles (pun intended). You forgot about the other part of it. You can vote to unpin threads as well. And too many threads getting pinned wouldn't be a problem because the number of votes required to pin a thread could be raised and raised and raised, if necessary. So, if there's too many threads pinned when it only requires 10 votes, then raise the limit to 15, then 20, then 25, etc. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 05:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bloody good idea..sick of utter SHIT being pinned when the REAL news that MATTERS...gets bumped away to oblivion.. Quoting: THE DOOMMods..admin...do it...this forum needs some democracy. THE DOOM, you're a legendary poster. If you believe in this idea please push for it... Only paid users could vote on pinning and unpinning threads. Trinity originally said that paid users would be able to pin a certain number of threads each month, is that still in effect? Allowing paid members to vote on pinning and unpinning threads would be good for business because people would probably pay $10 a month just to have the ability to vote on pinning and unpinning threads. This would be an incredible advertising point for GLP. This idea would take care of the spamming problem because each paid user would only be allowed one vote and that's easy to check. |
monadnock User ID: 218511 United States 06/16/2007 06:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 06:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 175983 United States 06/16/2007 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it would be a nightmare. Maybe pages and pages of pinned, useless threads. I like the idea that those threads that interest us could be voted to be pinned, eventually, but everyone here has such diverse interests. Quoting: StasisAnd then there are the trolls. 10 threads about poo pinned just for shits and giggles (pun intended). fuck... simplify... just dont pin shit let the cream/shit rise to the top |
Sigma User ID: 250561 United States 06/16/2007 06:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it would be a nightmare. Maybe pages and pages of pinned, useless threads. Quoting: StasisIf anyone here does NOT believe there would immediately be 2 pages of pinned Ron Paul threads, you got a serious problem. As for only allowing the votes of registered users, fine. Then a bunch of AC's would make a bunch of sockpuppet accounts immediately and reboot to vote over and over. That plan might work at one of those crap hole forums with 25 posters on average, but not here, with this many posters. ..|.. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 192293 China 06/16/2007 06:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it would be a nightmare. Maybe pages and pages of pinned, useless threads. Quoting: SigmaIf anyone here does NOT believe there would immediately be 2 pages of pinned Ron Paul threads, you got a serious problem. As for only allowing the votes of registered users, fine. Then a bunch of AC's would make a bunch of sockpuppet accounts immediately and reboot to vote over and over. That plan might work at one of those crap hole forums with 25 posters on average, but not here, with this many posters. What's your real agenda? I said that only paid users should be allowed to vote (taking care of the problem you mentioned about "sockpuppet accounts"): Only paid users could vote on pinning and unpinning threads. Trinity originally said that paid users would be able to pin a certain number of threads each month, is that still in effect? Allowing paid members to vote on pinning and unpinning threads would be good for business because people would probably pay $10 a month just to have the ability to vote on pinning and unpinning threads. This would be an incredible advertising point for GLP. This idea would take care of the spamming problem because each paid user would only be allowed one vote and that's easy to check. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 253054 China 06/16/2007 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 252937 New Zealand 06/17/2007 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 236253 United States 06/17/2007 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The mods do their best. Besides, if it's not pinned, it's probably good enough that you'll find it there on the first page anyway. It's been this way for many years. I'm not a control freak. I'd just want to enjoy GLP without making decision. And if you don't like what's pinned....don't read it. geesh |
Mr. Mannn User ID: 245475 United States 06/17/2007 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sudel_Tekneeq User ID: 210340 United States 06/17/2007 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, what we need to have is separate message boards in this forum, for example 1 for politics, another for space/science, etc. With just one board as it is right now, it gets chaotic and all sorts of threads get pinned. Besides, there is forum software out there that the web developer can implement which would be much easier I bet. The blackening of roses will send you to the edges of the land/ The emerald tablets of Thoth the Atlantean/ The hands of the mighty Lion of Judah/ Will throw you through the triangular portals of Bermuda/ Exploring the Hologramic aspects of consciousness/ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 196275 United States 06/17/2007 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |