Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 699 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 133,323
Pageviews Today: 214,068Threads Today: 83Posts Today: 1,713
04:36 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969

 
janedoenut

User ID: 75210020
United States
04/12/2019 02:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm
 Quoting: janedoenut


a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation, the problem is the solar radiation. Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76325032


I'm not missing the point. I believe the whole NASA space thing is bullshit and don't believe a single word they say about anything.

Last Edited by janedoenut on 04/12/2019 02:08 PM
“If you'll let me tell you what I imagine about myself, you'll find it a lot more interesting” –Anne Shirley
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 76260827
Netherlands
04/12/2019 02:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm
 Quoting: janedoenut

Why do hoaxies lie all the time?

Dr. Van Allen himself was hired by NASA to help them design the trajectories.
They were very well aware of the issue.
book


a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation,
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

Nope.
Earth's magnetic field, which cause the Belts, protects Earth from charged particles, i.e. electrons and protons, NOT x-rays etc.

the problem is the solar radiation.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

So WHAT IS the radiation environment in cis-lunar space?

Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

The ship and the suits were the protection.

Maybe, just maybe, you should read up on radiation issues before trying to discuss them in public.

The long and short of it is that NOBODY in the field agrees with you.
book


I believe the whole NASA space thing is bullshit and don't believe a single word they say about anything.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Believes have never proven anything.

So, unless you provide evidence to support that believe nobody is going to take you serious.

This is of course why in grown-up land hoaxies are the punchline in watercooler jokes.
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77553018
United States
04/12/2019 02:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


You have to spend a certain amount of time within the belt in order to receive a fatal dose of radiation. The Apollo missions minimized these hazards for astronauts by sending spacecraft at high speeds through the thinner areas of the upper belts, bypassing inner belts completely.
HolyBeast

User ID: 826012
United States
04/12/2019 03:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Flat earthers and moon landing hoax conspiracy geeks are the laziest anti-intellectuals I've ever seen. Most of your 'damning accusations' are easily found with a simple search engine and a mere IOTA of brainpower.

[link to observer.com (secure)]

"The number of cardiovascular disease-related deaths among the deep space astronauts were significantly higher.

The rate among astronauts who never flew is 9%. Among low-Earth orbiting astronauts, its 11%. For the men who travelled to the Moon, a staggering 43%, or 4-5 times higher than their less-travelled colleagues.The one exception to the study was Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who passed away after the study’s data had already been collected."

Also, it's not tinfoil, you twits. It's mylar. They also lived in a well built solid piece of equipment. The mylar was merely thin heat shielding surrounding it.
That same material you benefit from in any survival kit, the crinkly blanket material.

The lunar module is a case in expert design and engineering. Something that requires a high level understanding in all that fancy math you all thought you didn't need in HS.

It was packed with equipment in a way that was designed for purity of purpose:
[link to airandspace.si.edu (secure)]

[link to airandspace.si.edu (secure)] - detailed info.


And about it being 'shot' in another country - find me a single place on earth that is utterly devoid of life a rocky location. Even the most barren desert has plant life, small insects, creatures of all type. The moon was BARREN. LITERALLY BARREN. There was no atmosphere, hence the lack of atmospheric scattering effects that happen with film as well - which explains a lot of the oddities people often point out as proof.

Seriously, it gets old. You get told time and again, demonstrably proving you inability to handle basic physics or math work.

The earth is round.
We went to the moon.

You don't need a doctorates to understand all of this stuff. But you do need to think outside of your selectively hearing bubble and be willing to admit that your thinly held beliefs MIGHT BE WRONG. Plot twist - I for a short period can claim
that I too believed we didn't get to the moon. Shockingly, however, the data doesn't bear out. We went. We came, we saw, we conquered, and we didn't even use metric.


Get over it and start focusing on more important questions like 'are we originally from this planet?'
Agios o Theos, Agios ischyros, Agios athanatos, eleison imas.
Sanctus Deus, Sanctus Fortis, Sanctus Immortális, miserére nobis.
Holy God, Holy Strong, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us.

Quis Et Deus?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77553018
United States
04/12/2019 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Although I know it was technically possible to put a man on the Moon with 1960's technology, I do not discount the possibility that the Moon landings were faked. I'm sure that there was a contingency plan in place in the event that Apollo failed. After all, the stakes were very high to be the first to reach the Moon during the Cold War. If the Moon Landings were faked, then I believe there is good reason to believe that they were staged at Area 51. This would explain why Area 51 remains highly classified and guarded to this day.
janedoenut

User ID: 75210020
United States
04/12/2019 03:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm
 Quoting: janedoenut

Why do hoaxies lie all the time?

Dr. Van Allen himself was hired by NASA to help them design the trajectories.
They were very well aware of the issue.
book


a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation,
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

Nope.
Earth's magnetic field, which cause the Belts, protects Earth from charged particles, i.e. electrons and protons, NOT x-rays etc.

the problem is the solar radiation.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

So WHAT IS the radiation environment in cis-lunar space?

Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

The ship and the suits were the protection.

Maybe, just maybe, you should read up on radiation issues before trying to discuss them in public.

The long and short of it is that NOBODY in the field agrees with you.
book


I believe the whole NASA space thing is bullshit and don't believe a single word they say about anything.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Believes have never proven anything.

So, unless you provide evidence to support that believe nobody is going to take you serious.

This is of course why in grown-up land hoaxies are the punchline in watercooler jokes.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


I've posted several times of my evidence and strong family ties to NASA, if you missed them, that's on you and I've no need to justify anything to you. I also don't care if you want to believe in science and NASA or not. I enjoy the freedom for each of us to be able to do so.

Ad hominem attacks and name calling prove nothing either. Thus far, you've told everyone here that they are wrong and you are right. Are you aware that if you believe you already know it all, that also means that you are incapable of learning anything?
“If you'll let me tell you what I imagine about myself, you'll find it a lot more interesting” –Anne Shirley
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 76260827
Netherlands
04/12/2019 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695

They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm
 Quoting: janedoenut

Why do hoaxies lie all the time?

Dr. Van Allen himself was hired by NASA to help them design the trajectories.
They were very well aware of the issue.

I believe the whole NASA space thing is bullshit and don't believe a single word they say about anything.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Believes have never proven anything.

So, unless you provide evidence to support that believe nobody is going to take you serious.

This is of course why in grown-up land hoaxies are the punchline in watercooler jokes.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD

I've posted several times of my evidence
 Quoting: janedoenut

Since no hoaxie has been able to prove A SINGLE RELEVANT CLAIM EVER I will have to assume that your "evidence" falls in the same category as all other hoax "evidence", i.e. bullshit.

and strong family ties to NASA,
 Quoting: janedoenut

Which makes you imune to ignorance?

if you missed them, that's on you and I've no need to justify anything to you.
 Quoting: janedoenut

That is NOT an excuse for LYING.

I also don't care if you want to believe in science and NASA or not.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Apparently you don't care for truth either.

I enjoy the freedom for each of us to be able to do so.
 Quoting: janedoenut

You enjoy spreading lies?
WTF is wrong with you?

Ad hominem attacks and name calling prove nothing either.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Calling out a liar for lying is not an ad hom.

Thus far, you've told everyone here that they are wrong and you are right.
 Quoting: janedoenut

I don't need to prove I'm right.
YOU, as the accuser, need to prove YOU are right.
Pointing out that the "facts" you try to use as evidence are in fact lies and confabulation is just to highlight the fact that so far you failed to do so.

Are you aware that if you believe you already know it all, that also means that you are incapable of learning anything?
 Quoting: janedoenut

That's rather rich and super-ironic coming from a hoaxie.

Hoaxies are utterly ignorant about Apollo and spacetravel in general.
They seem to be completely incapable to learn anything other than lies and confabulations, as if they have some sort of mental screen against facts.

MY evidence: every singly hoax thread in the internet.
book

And yes, hoaxies are the butt of jokes among people who aren't ignorant about these things.
Live with it.
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
janedoenut

User ID: 75210020
United States
04/12/2019 09:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
I'm not a liar but you're correct when you state that I don't care about what you believe is truth. Do I care about truth in general? Yes, I do but I care more about freedom to believe whatever you want rather than your form of dictatorial forced "truth" by way of belittling tactics.

Again, name calling and ad hominem attacks doesn't prove jack shit but prove you weak both mind and spirit. You calling me a liar doesn't make it so.

I can appreciate that you are free to think whatever you will about me.
“If you'll let me tell you what I imagine about myself, you'll find it a lot more interesting” –Anne Shirley
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77552054
Dominican Republic
04/12/2019 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Diff country/countries were trying to debunk it because the US WON the space-race... and they had/have a hard time dealing with it.

Plus the fact that there is an American flag - flying on the moon... making it a US territory.

xmas
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4448622
United States
04/13/2019 02:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


You have to spend a certain amount of time within the belt in order to receive a fatal dose of radiation. The Apollo missions minimized these hazards for astronauts by sending spacecraft at high speeds through the thinner areas of the upper belts, bypassing inner belts completely.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77553018


The orbital inclination of the Apollo Earth orbit allowed a TLi trajectory that mostly bypassed the VAB..the VAB is aligned with Earth's magnetic poles, while the Apollo orbit/TLI inclination is based on the geographic poles. They basically sped around the edges if the belts. Also, the VAB radiation is particle, which means shielding is relatively easy with common, lightweight materials. The VAB isn't some sort of insurmountable barrier of doom...just something to deal with.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4448622
United States
04/13/2019 02:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Diff country/countries were trying to debunk it because the US WON the space-race... and they had/have a hard time dealing with it.

Plus the fact that there is an American flag - flying on the moon... making it a US territory.

xmas
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77552054


...make that six US flags up there (no, we still have no "ownership" of the Moon). You don't "fake" something six times...
?
User ID: 31075693
New Zealand
04/13/2019 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
When did disks arrive then as thought it was all tapes just sayinwtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73049824
Canada
04/13/2019 02:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
I always hear that the big argument that it can't be fake is due to the light angle in the shots. Supposedly you couldn't fake the parellel lines cast in shadows from a distant large light source.

However, why couldn't they simply use a parabolic reflector and a regular spotlight? Wouldn't that create the same effect?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71447918
Australia
04/13/2019 02:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
I went to the smithsonian about 15 years ago.

I had heard all the stuff about the moon landing being fake so I though I would look into a few things whilst there.

I took a tape measure with me as well just to check a particular something some "crazy" conspiracy theorist had mentioned to me.

It was ab o ut the size of the hatch on the lander and the size of the spacesuit...the backpack to be precice.

As they had full sized "models" there it wawnt hard to check.

So I stepped over the rope and quickly measure the height and width of the backpack.

Then later at the lander...the one you can actually go right up to and look inside...i quickly measure the doot height and width.

And GUESS FUCKEN WHAT?...

There is NO WAY..that a fully grown man could get through that hatch with the pack on...and NO WAY or room to change into and out of that pack in that tiny space.
How do you solve a problem?

User ID: 77510138
United Kingdom
04/13/2019 03:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
It was a could war thing with Russia ..

I never believed it because I looked at the photos and said no .

The lander looked as though it was made of aluminium foil ..I would never have gone in it anywhere on Earth let alone space ...

I had better not get started on that ...

They brought some of the “moon rock “ to the college I was at and handed it around .

It was black and machine cut shape ...

They all seemed happy about it ..

I wondered why it was black , well very dark grey ....

I just did not believe it ....but then I was just a girl .

I said nothing ...
Xlegic

User ID: 841126
Canada
04/13/2019 03:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Instead of infighting and or debating about the moon landing in past...

... why not nasa simply prove it by sending a robot up to the moon and have it broadcast live and non-edit video and pictures of the moon landings?

1. attach a video camera to the robot lunar on rocket.

2. launch the rocket.

3. once the rocket separates from robot lunar, the robot lunar head toward the moon.

4. robot lunar land on the moon.

5. the robot lunar can travel to the old landing sites.

All 5 steps can be done and proven by attaching a video camera streaming live and non-edit video and pictures while doing step 1 to 5.
anonym0us coward

User ID: 77371440
United Kingdom
04/13/2019 03:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Space gloves are very bulky, so I assume the space camera, the one without batteries, of course, was specially designed to work with those fat bulky gloves? I mean, it must have had extra large buttons etc?

I cant find any informatoin on the size of the camera, it would be intersting to see how it was used whilst wearing space gloves.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



I mean, you can see how difficult it is to perform simple functions whilst wearing space gloves.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

anonym0us coward

User ID: 77371440
United Kingdom
04/13/2019 03:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
It says here on this NASA website,


The Apollo spacesuit was basically a one-piece suit, which astronauts entered from the back. Each suit was made to fit (custom-tailored to) each astronaut.

Each Apollo mission required 15 suits to support the mission. For the main, or prime, three-man crew, each member had three suits: one for flight; one for training; and one as a flight backup in case something happened to the flight suit. Thus, the prime crew had a total of nine suits. The backup three-man crew each had two suits: one for flight and one for training.


[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

Where did they store these suits on the rocket?

Also, how did three astronauts get out of the suits (if the only way in and out was from the back), once they had their gloves on?

Did they zip each other up at the back?

My mind is just boggled at the thought of how they coped with getting dressed and undressed in these suits and gloves, especially in a really confined space. I would love to see this demonstrated.
anonym0us coward

User ID: 77371440
United Kingdom
04/13/2019 04:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Regarding this ISS spacesuit, he mentions a battery located in the backpack. Is this a new invention or did the old astronauts use batteries in the backpack too?

I notice it was mentioned above that no batteries were used in the cameras but did they need batteries in the spacesuit itself?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73065444
United States
04/13/2019 08:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
i remember watching the fake landing live in 69; I knew it was fake then. You have to be retarded to believe that we could go to the moon on TRANSISTORS, WE COULD NOT SEND A MANNED MISSION TODAY WITH OUR SUPERCOMPUTERS, let alone in 69. The backpack suit Armstrong had on was too big to fit out of the hatch AND who was filming him coming out of the beer can capsule ?
LHP598

User ID: 77436004
04/13/2019 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
I went to the smithsonian about 15 years ago.

I had heard all the stuff about the moon landing being fake so I though I would look into a few things whilst there.

I took a tape measure with me as well just to check a particular something some "crazy" conspiracy theorist had mentioned to me.

It was ab o ut the size of the hatch on the lander and the size of the spacesuit...the backpack to be precice.

As they had full sized "models" there it wawnt hard to check.

So I stepped over the rope and quickly measure the height and width of the backpack.

Then later at the lander...the one you can actually go right up to and look inside...i quickly measure the doot height and width.

And GUESS FUCKEN WHAT?...

There is NO WAY..that a fully grown man could get through that hatch with the pack on...and NO WAY or room to change into and out of that pack in that tiny space.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71447918


since there are pictures and video of them going through the hatch I have to ask, why do you lie?

Plus there is this video, where Astromut actually did measure using lasers and not lies like you

If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
LHP598

User ID: 77436004
04/13/2019 09:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
i remember watching the fake landing live in 69; I knew it was fake then. You have to be retarded to believe that we could go to the moon on TRANSISTORS, WE COULD NOT SEND A MANNED MISSION TODAY WITH OUR SUPERCOMPUTERS,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73065444

How much do better computers lift weight off the ground and into orbit?


let alone in 69. The backpack suit Armstrong had on was too big to fit out of the hatch
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73065444

demonstrably untrue.

AND who was filming him coming out of the beer can capsule ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73065444

A camera prepositioned on the MESA that was lowered by lanyard before he started down the ladder. How do you not know already when it is extremely easy to find out?
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 76260827
Netherlands
04/13/2019 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
How much do better computers lift weight off the ground and into orbit?
 Quoting: LHP598

Or, how many lbfs per megabyte?
book


I'm not a liar
 Quoting: janedoenut

Are you telling us you didn't know it was an untruth?
You spouted a-historical nonsense in a thread about space history?

Not much better.

but you're correct when you state that I don't care about what you believe is truth.
Do I care about truth in general? Yes, I do
 Quoting: janedoenut

Your lack of effort in truth finding seems to belie that.

If you want to find the truth about Apollo you will have to study Apollo.
The real record, not the fairy tales concocted by hoax-mongers.

but I care more about freedom to believe whatever you want rather than your form of dictatorial forced "truth" by way of belittling tactics.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Words have consequences.
You accused many people of having committed crimes. In public!
You expected that nobody would call you out?

You don't get to take the moral high ground here.
Accusing people based on nothing but bullshit is despicable.

Again, name calling and ad hominem attacks doesn't prove jack shit but prove you weak both mind and spirit. You calling me a liar doesn't make it so.

I can appreciate that you are free to think whatever you will about me.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Irrelevant diatribe.
Hoaxies always decent to metadebate, 'cause they can't debate the facts.
book


Plus the fact that there is an American flag - flying on the moon... making it a US territory.
 Quoting: DR Coward 77552054

That's not how it works.
See: Outer Space Treaty
book


So I stepped over the rope and quickly measure [..]
 Quoting: Ozzie Coward 71447918

You're only telling us that you are incompetent at measuring things.
(Or, more likely, are a big fat liar who lies.)

Hoaxies lie, it must be in their job description.

Courtesy Astromut:

book


The lander looked as though it was made of aluminium foil ..I would never have gone in it anywhere on Earth let alone space ...
 Quoting: How do you solve a problem?

Why? What's wrong with it?
And why do you think that looking at pictures is the proper way to asses the capabilities of a machine?
And why should we take your layman opinion over that of every single aerospace engineer in the world?

How is this not arrogance?
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD

User ID: 76260827
Netherlands
04/13/2019 01:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Space gloves are very bulky, so I assume the space camera, the one without batteries, of course, was specially designed to work with those fat bulky gloves? I mean, it must have had extra large buttons etc?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

You surmised correctly.

There was a small peddle for each ring, and a number of preset indents.

I cant find any information on the size of the camera
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Have you considered googling "Apollo camera"?

The main EVA cameras were modified Hasselblad 500 ELs.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
E stands for electrical. The notion that batteries can't work in a vacuum is just another misunderstanding.

Where did they store these suits on the rocket?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

[link to www.quora.com (secure)]

Also, how did three astronauts get out of the suits (if the only way in and out was from the back), once they had their gloves on?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

By taking the gloves off first.
The gloves aren't an integral part of the suits.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]



Did they zip each other up at the back?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Yes.
Mind you, the zippers themselves aren't airthigh.
They keep the rubber air seals together.

My mind is just boggled at the thought of how they coped with getting dressed and undressed in these suits and gloves, especially in a really confined space. I would love to see this demonstrated.
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

For Apollo you might be out of luck.
They were prolly to busy to operate a camera at the same time.

did the old astronauts use batteries in the backpack too?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Yes.
They needed electrical power for pumping cooling water and for the radio.
book
Reaching for the sky makes you taller.

Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
anonym0us coward

User ID: 77371440
United Kingdom
04/13/2019 02:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Space gloves are very bulky, so I assume the space camera, the one without batteries, of course, was specially designed to work with those fat bulky gloves? I mean, it must have had extra large buttons etc?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

You surmised correctly.

There was a small peddle for each ring, and a number of preset indents.

I cant find any information on the size of the camera
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Have you considered googling "Apollo camera"?

The main EVA cameras were modified Hasselblad 500 ELs.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]
E stands for electrical. The notion that batteries can't work in a vacuum is just another misunderstanding.

Where did they store these suits on the rocket?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

[link to www.quora.com (secure)]

Also, how did three astronauts get out of the suits (if the only way in and out was from the back), once they had their gloves on?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

By taking the gloves off first.
The gloves aren't an integral part of the suits.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]



Did they zip each other up at the back?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Yes.
Mind you, the zippers themselves aren't airthigh.
They keep the rubber air seals together.

My mind is just boggled at the thought of how they coped with getting dressed and undressed in these suits and gloves, especially in a really confined space. I would love to see this demonstrated.
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

For Apollo you might be out of luck.
They were prolly to busy to operate a camera at the same time.

did the old astronauts use batteries in the backpack too?
 Quoting: anonym0us coward

Yes.
They needed electrical power for pumping cooling water and for the radio.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I notice you said they did need batteries for the suits. Why did they not use batteries for the cameras if the batteries were safe and efficient for use in the suits.

Also, although you say the astronauts zipped each other up at the back, the only videos I have found of astronauts being booted up involve a whole team of people. And it's not just the female astronauts, but all of them. I cant see anyone being able to do this themselves, or to assist another astronaut once they are booted and suited themselves. It would make it a lot more credible if they could show us how it's done, especially in a confined area. It's hardly asking for a lot, there are tons of people out there willing to demonstrate given the opportunity.

If it can be done then it wouldnt be hard to demonstrate. And it would not cost anything either. Clearly a lot of suits were made and no doubt are still being made.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77538730
United States
04/13/2019 02:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
And when they land back on earth..this what happen..miliary aircraft fly over land area...then they push out capsule into ocean...navy pic them up...pretend they just got back from the moon..total bullshit.

Moon boys knew better than say anything different or they end up dead pronto
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76613423


No.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77550265


Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech.

All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass?
penguin
 Quoting: MountainTux NLI


You do realize that the footage was misplaced and found years ago. Why do you naysayers always try to debunk the truth?

It’s because you are ignorant and lack the proper education.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77538730
United States
04/13/2019 02:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Flat earthers and moon landing hoax conspiracy geeks are the laziest anti-intellectuals I've ever seen. Most of your 'damning accusations' are easily found with a simple search engine and a mere IOTA of brainpower.

[link to observer.com (secure)]

"The number of cardiovascular disease-related deaths among the deep space astronauts were significantly higher.

The rate among astronauts who never flew is 9%. Among low-Earth orbiting astronauts, its 11%. For the men who travelled to the Moon, a staggering 43%, or 4-5 times higher than their less-travelled colleagues.The one exception to the study was Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who passed away after the study’s data had already been collected."

Also, it's not tinfoil, you twits. It's mylar. They also lived in a well built solid piece of equipment. The mylar was merely thin heat shielding surrounding it.
That same material you benefit from in any survival kit, the crinkly blanket material.

The lunar module is a case in expert design and engineering. Something that requires a high level understanding in all that fancy math you all thought you didn't need in HS.

It was packed with equipment in a way that was designed for purity of purpose:
[link to airandspace.si.edu (secure)]
[link to airandspace.si.edu (secure)] - detailed info.


And about it being 'shot' in another country - find me a single place on earth that is utterly devoid of life a rocky location. Even the most barren desert has plant life, small insects, creatures of all type. The moon was BARREN. LITERALLY BARREN. There was no atmosphere, hence the lack of atmospheric scattering effects that happen with film as well - which explains a lot of the oddities people often point out as proof.

Seriously, it gets old. You get told time and again, demonstrably proving you inability to handle basic physics or math work.

The earth is round.
We went to the moon.
You don't need a doctorates to understand all of this stuff. But you do need to think outside of your selectively hearing bubble and be willing to admit that your thinly held beliefs MIGHT BE WRONG. Plot twist - I for a short period can claim
that I too believed we didn't get to the moon. Shockingly, however, the data doesn't bear out. We went. We came, we saw, we conquered, and we didn't even use metric.


Get over it and start focusing on more important questions like 'are we originally from this planet?'
 Quoting: HolyBeast


Well said. These ignorant fools show their lack of common sense and education.

5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77538730
United States
04/13/2019 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm
 Quoting: janedoenut

Why do hoaxies lie all the time?

Dr. Van Allen himself was hired by NASA to help them design the trajectories.
They were very well aware of the issue.
book


a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation,
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

Nope.
Earth's magnetic field, which cause the Belts, protects Earth from charged particles, i.e. electrons and protons, NOT x-rays etc.

the problem is the solar radiation.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

So WHAT IS the radiation environment in cis-lunar space?

Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection.
 Quoting: Swedish Coward 76325032

The ship and the suits were the protection.

Maybe, just maybe, you should read up on radiation issues before trying to discuss them in public.

The long and short of it is that NOBODY in the field agrees with you.
book


I believe the whole NASA space thing is bullshit and don't believe a single word they say about anything.
 Quoting: janedoenut

Believes have never proven anything.

So, unless you provide evidence to support that believe nobody is going to take you serious.

This is of course why in grown-up land hoaxies are the punchline in watercooler jokes.
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


I've posted several times of my evidence and strong family ties to NASA, if you missed them, that's on you and I've no need to justify anything to you. I also don't care if you want to believe in science and NASA or not. I enjoy the freedom for each of us to be able to do so.

Ad hominem attacks and name calling prove nothing either. Thus far, you've told everyone here that they are wrong and you are right. Are you aware that if you believe you already know it all, that also means that you are incapable of learning anything?
 Quoting: janedoenut




Bravo!! But don’t waste your time on the feeble-minded.

I had a relative that was a top engineer for NASA. He was in Mission Control for many of the Apollo flights, including 13.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48746230
United States
04/13/2019 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
Go to Smithsonian museum and tell me you would get it and go to the moon...I would not get in it and sail to a water dock 40 foot offshore..dumb fuck..it looks like reynolds wrap designed by CIA or MI5 for public consumption
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695


There was a Reported that did just that and talked to the Engineers. The Lunar Lander is too small for two Astronauts to maneuver inside and exit the hatch of the Lander with their Space suits on!
It would have been impossible!

The whole Program was a sham.
They only tested the Lander one time before the "Mission" and it failed!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72835707
United States
04/13/2019 03:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969
So, tards, are airplanes fake as well?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77550265


Actually, yes.

People faking Unidentified Flying Objects ALL OVER Youtube.

Quite annoying.

Lots of other things, too.