It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969

They faked the moon landing. Kubrick was involved, his wife spilled the beans about it years back. The "elite" offered Kubrick a then new state of the art $2 million camera lens system, among other things, in return for him doing it. Jay Weidner write a whole book on it called "Kubrick's Odyssey" which was endorsed by Kubrick's wife. They were still married at the time of Kubrick's death so it wasn't some bitter divorce thing, it's the truth.

Amazing how you can tell its structure and function simply by looking at the external insulative covering.

Listen to Apollo astronot Alan Bean when asked about the Van Allen belt. Keep in mind, Bean had THE RIGHT STUFF, which we no longer have. When you have THE RIGHT STUFF, you don't even have to think about the radiation belt. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

All good and valid points.

I don't know why all these people seem so eager to believe a lie... when evidence abounds everywhere that THEY lie, all the time. Our "leaders" are pathological liars.

Years ago I read a book called, NASA mooned America.

All you said and much more is in the book.

God bless and let the truth ring out!

The best evidence or Achilles's heel in the we didn't go to the Moon debate is ask what cameras were used to take the pictures on the Moon.

The batteries used in the cameras will not function in the extreme hot/cold temps that are experienced on the Moon.

So therefore no pictures could of been taken.

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Okay, how the hell did any astronaut manage to get in and out of that thing in a confined area all alone. As you can see, it took at least two people to suit him up.

There is no way any astronaut could fasten that helmet on his own. I would love to see a demonstration of anyone doing that alone.

Those fat gloves, once they are on, you could not possibly use your fingers for anything.

It takes a whole team to get someone in and out of a space suit. How could it have been possible in the original 'moon landings'?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

It takes a team to put a suit on and take it off. A team who is not wearing those fat space gloves.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I grew up with the son of a man who walked on the moon.
He was our soccer coach. I've known him a very long time.
Trust me. It really happened. This man is the worst liar ever. There's no way he could have kept a secret like that for this long. Would you like me to ask him on his deathbed what is the truth? Will you deniers be satisfied with that? I don't think so.

Because the moon landings were done by men. Your video is of a woman.

What batteries?

[link to www.hasselblad.com (secure)]

There are no videos showing a man doing it without a team helping him. I would like to see a team of men, ie 3 helping each other on and off with these space suits in a confined space, ie the size of a rocket. I beleive they can only be worn for a few hours at a time so they need to be taken on and off quickly and the adult diapers removed too.

How many times would they have taken these on and off on each trip? Interesting to think about it.

Btw, are you suggesting women are less able than men? Hm...

no, they don't claim any such thing. Read up on orbital inclination....and particle radiation and the shielding thereof...

and Chevy can't build a '64 Bel Air today...so those were fake too...ignorant kids today...

Argumentum ad hominem.




Your personal lack of courage is not the gold standard for heroism.


What it looks like to an ignorant dimwit on the internet is irrelevant.

If YOU claim it couldn't have worked than YOU will need to prove so.
This will of course require that you explain what and how it was to do it in the first place.




Distance x time x shielding.


Not to you they couldn't.
Explaining 2+2=4 to you would probably be difficult.




Why don't you provide a citation for that so we all can have a laugh.


Why do you lie?
Kubrick just bought the f/0.7 lenses.


I know why Weidner lies, he's a fraud.
But why do you lie.




[citation needed]

Or, in other words, stuff you pulled out of your arse aren't facts.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 04/12/2019 12:30 PM

[link to epdf.tips (secure)]

great book!

no, i won't do any such thing

please read [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)]

MOONGATE:

Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program
The NASA-Military Cover-Up

[link to archive.org (secure)]

Moon landing is a known hoax.

Next?

Interesting, I've never actually heard of the book... thank you for the heads up, will have to dig it up!

Oh, but they can... whyever would you make up such silliness that they can't? For that matter, YOU could build one, as could I, if you had the fabrication and machine skills, or just wanted to make it out of plastic and 3d print your parts, as Jay Leno does for a lot of his restorations.

You know why? BECAUSE BLUEPRINTS STILL EXIST FOR THE MACHINE. Not to mention common parts, and FULL VEHICLES. What THAT means is that we can replicate EXACTLY what parts and processes went into the creation of the machine.

Now, again, this is logic and common sense, so I expect a LOT of people such as yourself won't understand... but if something as mundane as a SINGLE MODEL YEAR of car can be faithfully reproduced (yes, we're 100% discounting your postulation as it's simply foolish, hard stop) then how is it even POSSIBLE that blueprints and schematics for something as VITALLY important, if for nothing else than historical posterity, as the lunar module could be "lost?" Furthermore, as someone else pointed out, we can go to the Smithsonian and look at a REAL LIVE, WENT TO THE MOON module... but you're going to tell me that we couldn't exatly reproduce the unit with the tech we have today? Bud, A team of 12 year olds with micrometers and a camera could rebuild the entire Apollo FLEET, and probably for 1/25th of the price, in 60's dollars.

Your assertion is so far beyond the ridiculous that I can't even fathom where to start. Suffice to say that if you're actually willing to think, as opposed to resting on your flawed assumptions, that you'll at least start to recognize the disconnect between the official lines and the reality. As I said from the start, I can't prove that a manned landing DIDN'T happen, nor can anyone else without inside evidence - but with the FACTS available and logic applied, it's far more likely that we DIDN'T walk on the moon than that we DID. Don't let your preconceptions trip you.

And for the record, there's a good chance I'm much older than YOU are, so I'd shelve the "kids" talk, sonny.

They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh.

/sarcasm

Last Edited by janedoenut on 04/12/2019 02:07 PM

a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation, the problem is the solar radiation. Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection.