It was Impossible to Fake the Moon Landing on video in 1969 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76613423 Iceland 04/11/2019 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77513825 United States 04/11/2019 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They faked the moon landing. Kubrick was involved, his wife spilled the beans about it years back. The "elite" offered Kubrick a then new state of the art $2 million camera lens system, among other things, in return for him doing it. Jay Weidner write a whole book on it called "Kubrick's Odyssey" which was endorsed by Kubrick's wife. They were still married at the time of Kubrick's death so it wasn't some bitter divorce thing, it's the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77550975 Iceland 04/11/2019 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They faked the moon landing. Kubrick was involved, his wife spilled the beans about it years back. The "elite" offered Kubrick a then new state of the art $2 million camera lens system, among other things, in return for him doing it. Jay Weidner write a whole book on it called "Kubrick's Odyssey" which was endorsed by Kubrick's wife. They were still married at the time of Kubrick's death so it wasn't some bitter divorce thing, it's the truth. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77513825 He had nothing to do with it at all. |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 04/11/2019 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Go to Smithsonian museum and tell me you would get it and go to the moon...I would not get in it and sail to a water dock 40 foot offshore..dumb fuck..it looks like reynolds wrap designed by CIA or MI5 for public consumption Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Amazing how you can tell its structure and function simply by looking at the external insulative covering. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75473435 United States 04/12/2019 01:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Listen to Apollo astronot Alan Bean when asked about the Van Allen belt. Keep in mind, Bean had THE RIGHT STUFF, which we no longer have. When you have THE RIGHT STUFF, you don't even have to think about the radiation belt. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
1guynAz User ID: 77374766 United States 04/12/2019 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75326953 United States 04/12/2019 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
deplorable scottfree User ID: 77499837 United States 04/12/2019 02:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And when they land back on earth..this what happen..miliary aircraft fly over land area...then they push out capsule into ocean...navy pic them up...pretend they just got back from the moon..total bullshit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Moon boys knew better than say anything different or they end up dead pronto All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation. No. Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech. All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass? All good and valid points. I don't know why all these people seem so eager to believe a lie... when evidence abounds everywhere that THEY lie, all the time. Our "leaders" are pathological liars. Years ago I read a book called, NASA mooned America. All you said and much more is in the book. God bless and let the truth ring out! J 17:15: "I pray not that Thou shouldst take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldst keep them from the evil. Truth, beauty and virtue ... all the things that THEY hate. All the things God loves. |
The Gullible Skeptic User ID: 77300925 United States 04/12/2019 02:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The best evidence or Achilles's heel in the we didn't go to the Moon debate is ask what cameras were used to take the pictures on the Moon. The batteries used in the cameras will not function in the extreme hot/cold temps that are experienced on the Moon. So therefore no pictures could of been taken. INTP/8w9 Ennegram "You can't teach anyone anything but they can choose to learn" -Me- "To exist is to destroy"-Me- "Specialization is for insects" -Robert Heinlein- Nine Noble Virtues: ODINISM: Truth,Courage,Honor,Fidelity,Discipline,Hospitality,Self Reliance, Industriousness, Perseverance |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52055181 United States 04/12/2019 03:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anonym0us coward User ID: 77371440 United Kingdom 04/12/2019 04:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, how the hell did any astronaut manage to get in and out of that thing in a confined area all alone. As you can see, it took at least two people to suit him up. There is no way any astronaut could fasten that helmet on his own. I would love to see a demonstration of anyone doing that alone. Those fat gloves, once they are on, you could not possibly use your fingers for anything. |
anonym0us coward User ID: 77371440 United Kingdom 04/12/2019 05:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It takes a whole team to get someone in and out of a space suit. How could it have been possible in the original 'moon landings'? [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
anonym0us coward User ID: 77371440 United Kingdom 04/12/2019 07:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It takes a team to put a suit on and take it off. A team who is not wearing those fat space gloves. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Zhivago7 User ID: 49598504 United States 04/12/2019 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I grew up with the son of a man who walked on the moon. He was our soccer coach. I've known him a very long time. Trust me. It really happened. This man is the worst liar ever. There's no way he could have kept a secret like that for this long. Would you like me to ask him on his deathbed what is the truth? Will you deniers be satisfied with that? I don't think so. |
Zhivago7 User ID: 49598504 United States 04/12/2019 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It takes a whole team to get someone in and out of a space suit. How could it have been possible in the original 'moon landings'? Quoting: anonym0us coward [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Because the moon landings were done by men. Your video is of a woman. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26779345 United States 04/12/2019 07:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | starring Barbara Streisand's retarded husband. (Anyone who would marry that bitch HAS to be retarded!) The low IQ masses bought into it, you know, the crowd that believes in Niburu, the flat earth, the Annunaki, the list is almost endless, but they ALL have one thing in common. They couldn't launch an Estes Rocket, and Celestial Mechanics is something they will never, EVER understand. Make that two things. |
Louis in Richmond That is my arm now; broken for 7 months User ID: 3079061 United States 04/12/2019 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The best evidence or Achilles's heel in the we didn't go to the Moon debate is ask what cameras were used to take the pictures on the Moon. Quoting: The Gullible Skeptic The batteries used in the cameras will not function in the extreme hot/cold temps that are experienced on the Moon. So therefore no pictures could of been taken. What batteries? [link to www.hasselblad.com (secure)] Until your military service has required you neutralize enemy combatants and invaders in the defense of your country, don't presume to tell us that have defended you that you don't support every shot we fired to eliminate that enemy. |
anonym0us coward User ID: 77371440 United Kingdom 04/12/2019 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It takes a whole team to get someone in and out of a space suit. How could it have been possible in the original 'moon landings'? Quoting: anonym0us coward [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Because the moon landings were done by men. Your video is of a woman. There are no videos showing a man doing it without a team helping him. I would like to see a team of men, ie 3 helping each other on and off with these space suits in a confined space, ie the size of a rocket. I beleive they can only be worn for a few hours at a time so they need to be taken on and off quickly and the adult diapers removed too. How many times would they have taken these on and off on each trip? Interesting to think about it. Btw, are you suggesting women are less able than men? Hm... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4448622 United States 04/12/2019 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 they claimed to have gone through some hole near the pole no, they don't claim any such thing. Read up on orbital inclination....and particle radiation and the shielding thereof... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4448622 United States 04/12/2019 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And when they land back on earth..this what happen..miliary aircraft fly over land area...then they push out capsule into ocean...navy pic them up...pretend they just got back from the moon..total bullshit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Moon boys knew better than say anything different or they end up dead pronto All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation. No. Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech. All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass? and Chevy can't build a '64 Bel Air today...so those were fake too...ignorant kids today... |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 04/12/2019 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Argumentum ad hominem. Go to Smithsonian museum and tell me you would get it and go to the moon...I would not get in it and sail to a water dock 40 foot offshore. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Your personal lack of courage is not the gold standard for heroism. it looks like reynolds wrap designed by CIA or MI5 for public consumption Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 What it looks like to an ignorant dimwit on the internet is irrelevant. If YOU claim it couldn't have worked than YOU will need to prove so. This will of course require that you explain what and how it was to do it in the first place. Distance x time x shielding. .they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 Not to you they couldn't. Explaining 2+2=4 to you would probably be difficult. Kubrick was involved, his wife spilled the beans about it years back. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77513825 Why don't you provide a citation for that so we all can have a laugh. The "elite" offered Kubrick a then new state of the art $2 million camera lens system, among other things, in return for him doing it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77513825 Why do you lie? Kubrick just bought the f/0.7 lenses. Jay Weidner write a whole book on it called "Kubrick's Odyssey" which was endorsed by Kubrick's wife. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77513825 I know why Weidner lies, he's a fraud. But why do you lie. The batteries used in the cameras will not function in the extreme hot/cold temps that are experienced on the Moon. Quoting: The Gullible Skeptic [citation needed] Or, in other words, stuff you pulled out of your arse aren't facts. Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 04/12/2019 12:30 PM Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76325032 Sweden 04/12/2019 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76613423 All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation. No. Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech. All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass? All good and valid points. I don't know why all these people seem so eager to believe a lie... when evidence abounds everywhere that THEY lie, all the time. Our "leaders" are pathological liars. Years ago I read a book called, NASA mooned America. All you said and much more is in the book. God bless and let the truth ring out! [link to epdf.tips (secure)] great book! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72258389 United States 04/12/2019 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 they claimed to have gone through some hole near the pole no, they don't claim any such thing. Read up on orbital inclination....and particle radiation and the shielding thereof... no, i won't do any such thing please read [link to www.hq.nasa.gov (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76325032 Sweden 04/12/2019 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MOONGATE: Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program The NASA-Military Cover-Up [link to archive.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76432271 United States 04/12/2019 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MountainTux NLI User ID: 68141028 Canada 04/12/2019 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76613423 All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation. No. Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech. All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass? All good and valid points. I don't know why all these people seem so eager to believe a lie... when evidence abounds everywhere that THEY lie, all the time. Our "leaders" are pathological liars. Years ago I read a book called, NASA mooned America. All you said and much more is in the book. God bless and let the truth ring out! Interesting, I've never actually heard of the book... thank you for the heads up, will have to dig it up! ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
MountainTux NLI User ID: 68141028 Canada 04/12/2019 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76613423 All of the faux lunar surface scenes were shot at a DOE installation. No. Actually, here you're at least correct - filmed mostly in Sudbury, Ontario, as far as the moonscapes. Dubbed "Training video" then used when they.. of course... "lost" the actual moon footage. Because of course, NASA would just LOSE some of the most important film footage in history. Much like they've "lost" the blueprints and ability to replicate the lunar modules which supposedly were able to protect from VA radiation - which we can't manage now, with FAR superior tech. All matters of public record - maybe extract your head from the preconceptions buried in your ass? and Chevy can't build a '64 Bel Air today...so those were fake too...ignorant kids today... Oh, but they can... whyever would you make up such silliness that they can't? For that matter, YOU could build one, as could I, if you had the fabrication and machine skills, or just wanted to make it out of plastic and 3d print your parts, as Jay Leno does for a lot of his restorations. You know why? BECAUSE BLUEPRINTS STILL EXIST FOR THE MACHINE. Not to mention common parts, and FULL VEHICLES. What THAT means is that we can replicate EXACTLY what parts and processes went into the creation of the machine. Now, again, this is logic and common sense, so I expect a LOT of people such as yourself won't understand... but if something as mundane as a SINGLE MODEL YEAR of car can be faithfully reproduced (yes, we're 100% discounting your postulation as it's simply foolish, hard stop) then how is it even POSSIBLE that blueprints and schematics for something as VITALLY important, if for nothing else than historical posterity, as the lunar module could be "lost?" Furthermore, as someone else pointed out, we can go to the Smithsonian and look at a REAL LIVE, WENT TO THE MOON module... but you're going to tell me that we couldn't exatly reproduce the unit with the tech we have today? Bud, A team of 12 year olds with micrometers and a camera could rebuild the entire Apollo FLEET, and probably for 1/25th of the price, in 60's dollars. Your assertion is so far beyond the ridiculous that I can't even fathom where to start. Suffice to say that if you're actually willing to think, as opposed to resting on your flawed assumptions, that you'll at least start to recognize the disconnect between the official lines and the reality. As I said from the start, I can't prove that a manned landing DIDN'T happen, nor can anyone else without inside evidence - but with the FACTS available and logic applied, it's far more likely that we DIDN'T walk on the moon than that we DID. Don't let your preconceptions trip you. And for the record, there's a good chance I'm much older than YOU are, so I'd shelve the "kids" talk, sonny. ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
janedoenut User ID: 75210020 United States 04/12/2019 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 They did explain it with this... They were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance. sheesh. /sarcasm Last Edited by janedoenut on 04/12/2019 02:07 PM “If you'll let me tell you what I imagine about myself, you'll find it a lot more interesting” –Anne Shirley "Seemingly your father nor mother taught you that as a man, it's your job to protect and provide for women and lead strong families. As men, had you done your job, you wouldn't be living in a matriarchal society." - Janedoenut, 2018 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76325032 Sweden 04/12/2019 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 They did explain it, they were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance, sheesh. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76325032 Sweden 04/12/2019 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tell me now how they survive the van allen radiation..they could not explain that now, and they can't explain it now. they can't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77091695 They did explain it, they were unaware of its existence therefore the van allen belts were of no significance, sheesh. a lot of you are missing the point, it is not a matter of "Surviving" The Van allen belts; that makes no sense. The belts protect the earth from solar radiation, the problem is the solar radiation. Now the moon and beyond the belts has no protection, the ships and suits also had no protection. |