Whats the deal with this "Hoaxie" thing? is that what people are being called for asking questions about the official NASA story?

Have the pseudo-know-it-all-cause-i learned it school types actually studied the question from both sides?

if not perhaps consider reading:
We never went to the moon - Bill Kaysing
Moongate
Nasa Mooned America - Ralph rene
(lots of interviews on youtube if ur to lazy some links in this thread)

or



for an analysis of the photography,
and A funny thing happened on the way to the moon has some info too.

Their are so many arguments, for example:

where was the evidence of 1/6th Gravity?

how did the flimsy antennae on the module not burn up on re-entry?

why do the feet of the lander look spotless? no dust, and no disturbance of the dust under the lander?

Why does it look like the Rovers tracks just stop and start out of no-where?

how do footprints form when their is no moisture in the dust?

how did the astronots take such amazing photos with gauntlets on, with no view finder etc. Also why do many pictures look like they were taken from viewpoints that were impossible?

why didnt the film fog?

and on and on and on...