HOW DOES IT GO FROM A WALL TO FLOODING CITIES WITH IMMIGRANTS????

read the chain of posts and dont just chime in on the last post not knowing the conversation being had

Thank the democRats

They want more voters but they need those voters to go to Texas and other red states. By Trump sending them to the Sanctuary city he is pretty much defending the purpose the Democrats are wanting them to be allowed to come in. Plus until he gets funding for a wall and the rest of the things needed to secure the boarder the immigrant from South America are not going to stop coming in. So sending them to Sanctuary cities Trump is screwing up the Democrats plan to steal the election. At the same time Trump is showing that the Democrats are hypocrites and do not want the immigrants in their cities. This will also possibly have an event on the immigrants that have been here and they may no longer show up and vote or support the Democrats.

Dont tell others how to respond to you posts, shillings

Dont bother mate, OP is a democRat shill

and what would keep them in blue states?

by sending them to sanctuary cities he is ALLOWING IMMIGRANTS IN not stopping them.

regardless if they go to blue state or red states, it would be allowing immigrants in, not keeping them out

it contradicts his whole immigration policy / agenda

Easier to deport them in the future once they are concentrated in a few cities instead of spread around the whole country.

Don't bother trying to have a discussion with AC 60, he cannot seem to comprehend what he is reading and supports flooding the US with immigrants, not keeping them out

so you want to let them in, in order to deport them???

who am I shilling for? I am for strong borders and NOT for flooding ANY city, red or blue with immigrants

you want to kill them at the border OR allow them all in to blue states....so that huge parts of the US would now be overrun wtih immigrants

No, the ones already there. The border situation still has to be resolved, but he can't do that alone! As long as that isn't being taken care of, all the existing and future illegal aliens should be assigned to sanctuary cities.

so you are for flooding US cities with illegal aliens? Again what is keeping them from leaving the sanctuary cities?

Nothing, but they wont leave utopia to live next to the inbred family

so wait, i thought you said liberal cities were shitholes... now they are a utopia?? and the red cities are full of inbred rednecks???

Trump is just playing 8D chess with the Dems. Everyone on GLP knows that!

Last Edited by Vilja on 04/13/2019 03:11 PM

Flooding a few retarded cities or flooding the whole country, which do you prefer?

I would also put a tracker in every illegal that would only be taken out if they aquire legal US citizenship. An alert would be sent to law enforcement if they leave the sanctuary city. The penalty for unauthorized leaving should be instant deportation.

again, but it is not 8D chess to contradict your OWN immigration agenda by saying you will FLOOD the US with immigrants

i thought the idea was to STOP immigration, not allow any of it.

and again, those retarded cities have populations of conservatives living in them. So, do those conservatives who voted for trump who live in liberal cities have to suffer too? No liberal city is 100% populated with liberals. People in CA and NY and other big liberal states voted for trump too.

bump

still waiting for someone to explain this

These illegals are already in the "system" awaiting their court date. Most won't show, so bus them (while you have them) to California, Oregon, and Washington state sanctuary cities. Plus a few to New York also.

so if they are already in the system, how is it a flood? and what keeps them from not leaving CA, OR or WA?

Pretty simple if you can think for yourself. Tens of thousands are already in and being detained at the centers. Not allowed to send them back, little leftie snowflakes cry if you detain them till their court dates so let them go and why not send them to a sanctuary city...got it now junior snowflake?

WALL IS TO LADDER AS REFUGEE IS TO SANCTUARY CITY


Have a nice day.
The ladder is a wee bit longer than you anticipated it would be and it reaches all the way to the open arms of the new privileged and guilt free Sanctuary Cities.

A glorious thing to behold.



Last Edited by PINKORCHID- In the Light on 04/13/2019 06:34 PM

DIDN'T THE 9TH CIRCUIT JUST RULE HE COULD DEPORT THEM BACK TO MEXICO WHILE WAITING FOR THE TRIAL?

90% of them don't show up and stay in the US.

By putting them in ANY SANCUARY CITY, it doesn't stop coming in and staying...

WTF, this is not what we voted for!


Shills are trying hard to make everyone think this is a good idea....

pathetic

Um no.

I let you slide on your first straw man when you brought up flame throwers.

You did it again.

So now, no.

It was a feint.

Nothing more.

Everyone else reacts.

The threat is irrelevant after the fact.

The fight has moved on.

Next round.

Reminds me when some of you clowns thought Trump was going to attack North Korea and start WWIII. So relax Jack, nothins gonna happen.

We need walls around sanctuary cities to keep them IN.

Funny, that reminds me when you ass hat shills said Trump would never ban the bumpstocks.

AND BTW, WAR with NK is inching closer because NK is doing exactly the same thing they did when Bill tried getting a peace deal. They stall and atall, but this time I give that Trump did not give anything.

Sooon...

Now how about quitting your shilling and open your eyes.

omg....bumpstocks, biggest piece of junk ever devised..