And on the microphone he whispered, “Send in the Trojan Horse, for those inside shall win our war.” An Anomalous tale.

The question is this;

Does one like the world? If so, then there would be no need for change.

If not, how would one change the world? What would one want the world to be like? That is the first question that plagues the minds of potential seekers.

The next question would be how would one obtain this change? One can have a vision but not know how to enact change or know how to enact change, but have no vision. In the end, the knowledge of both is necessary and acquirable.

Specifics of what one wants to see are not necessarily important. The masters have always painted in broad strokes. Why would anyone worry about the small stuff?

Then one must ask, “How can I make this change?” It is “they” who control or attempt to the world by physical, mental, and psychological methods and not us. It is they who control or attempt to control the financial world, the educational world, the religious world, the modes of transport and of production, of law enforcement and military matters. Who are we to be able to make the changes we would like to see when they control all of this? The question must be asked, “What do they not control or can never control?” If one can find this one can spot what has always been their key weakness and our key strength. It lies in proper metaphysical understanding. Once one understands and lives by natural law, man-made law is inherently superseded... They know this and we know this and they know that we know this. And they know that ultimately whatever they try will fail thus they are the fishes in water and we are whatever we want to be.

Once the practitioner discovers this, whichever way one wants the world can go. What is one’s morality like? Shall we all continue to suffer? Or shall we all break free from suffering?

Is it correct to have this massive controlling collective who believes it has the ability and right to impose its will upon the world as it sees fit? Or... is it better to have individuals who have gained their own right through challenge and suffering to change the world as they see fit? Who has gained the right? The collective or the individual? We no longer need the false rulership that the world has come to accept. We are big kids now.

The world shall either end with a whimper or it shall begin with a bang. What would you choose? What do you think a master would choose? To roll over and die or to rise and fight? Or to entrench oneself? As if in a castle? For the masters of the world never needed to be in the public eye. In the past, all knew where the true influence originated. The only difference between the present world and the past is that masters were acknowledged back in the day and now they are hunted and killed. But a true master cannot be killed. He cannot be humiliated if he does not accept humiliation. He merely perseveres and proceeds to knock all barriers down from the next step. True masters will always be in the background UNTIL they can no longer remain hidden. It will never be a master’s choice to reveal himself, but he will he pushed by those who have fear. But by that time the war will already have been decided for wars AND battles are won before they are even fought.

Why must the world continue to cower in the face of the unknown? Why must humanity cower from the evolution that is destined for every individual and thus the whole?

Embrace what lies ahead. Why not attempt to reach a higher of even full potentiality of existence? Have we not tired yet of mediocrity? Or is it that our leaders think that nothing exists beyond mediocrity? Have we not seen glimpses of our future in our past?

And on the microphone he whispered, “Send in the Trojan Horse, for those inside shall win our war.”

Fight onwards brothers.