BAD BOEING!! They're REPLACING 900 workers with TECHNOLOGY amid 737 scrutiny | |
^EyeSeeAll^ User ID: 34398756 United States 05/06/2019 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like they're still going to have made money off of the 737 fiasco, as they will now replace thousands of workers (starting with 900 right now) with computers and automated processes that does not require Human input. Quoting: Yew [link to www.yahoo.com (secure)] Nothing like fixing your mistake by destroying the livelihoods of those who helped your business prosper, eh? Clearly there were people not doing their jobs correctly thus the decision to replace them with automated robots. I can't hardly blame them, and to be honest- I'd almost rather travel in a plane built by computer precision robots than your average millennial (I'm a millennial). TRUMP 2020 Willam Barr 2024 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33891072 Poland 05/06/2019 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jj johns J to the 3rd User ID: 77401508 Switzerland 05/06/2019 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they made a decision to try to save money by using engines that didn't fit on the planes. this change to the normal aerodynamics of the plane allowed them to get around FAA regulations that would have normally needed them to re do (pilot) certification on those planes. this would have cost the airlines a lot of money and time, and boeing's workaround avoided this, to the detriment of the flying public. there was a good article about this a month or so ago. i think it was in the publication named after the large ocean on the border with the east coast of the usa. (banned here sometimes). Last Edited by Jay3 on 05/06/2019 09:51 AM . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
Yew (OP) User ID: 75758325 United States 05/06/2019 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like they're still going to have made money off of the 737 fiasco, as they will now replace thousands of workers (starting with 900 right now) with computers and automated processes that does not require Human input. Quoting: Yew [link to www.yahoo.com (secure)] Nothing like fixing your mistake by destroying the livelihoods of those who helped your business prosper, eh? Clearly there were people not doing their jobs correctly thus the decision to replace them with automated robots. I can't hardly blame them, and to be honest- I'd almost rather travel in a plane built by computer precision robots than your average millennial (I'm a millennial). yeah it's not a bad idea to reduce potential for Human error. just sucks people had to die and now people are losing their jobs because of boeings self proclaimed accidental actions with the planes computer programming. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Satire is one of the few forms of protected speech we can use to, well, speak. Everything i say is satire and intended for entertainment purposes only. Not a single communication to, from, associated with, or connected to this IP address in any fashion whatsoever, at any point in time (past, present and future), is intended to convey fact. This disclaimer proves everything I type is satire and meant to entertain other people ONLY. Any data which appears to convey a fact or truth is 100% purely unintentional and should only be construed as a playful attempt to joke, provide satire, or entertain. I am not liable for any information that has been, in any way, connected to this computer, IP address, network or person. |
Yew (OP) User ID: 75758325 United States 05/06/2019 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | human error had nothing to do with the boeing max carshes. Quoting: jj johns they made a decision to try to save money by using engines that didn't fit on the planes. this change to the normal aerodynamics of the plane allowed them to get around FAA regulations that would have normally needed them to re do certification on those planes. this would have cost the airlines a lot of money and time, and boeing's workaround avoided this, to the detriment of the flying public. there was a good article about this a month or so ago. i think it was in the publication named after the large ocean on the border with the east coast of the usa. (banned here sometimes). i believe i recall that article as well. Intentional design change to avoid certain legal fees with the planes that lowered their level of safety [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Satire is one of the few forms of protected speech we can use to, well, speak. Everything i say is satire and intended for entertainment purposes only. Not a single communication to, from, associated with, or connected to this IP address in any fashion whatsoever, at any point in time (past, present and future), is intended to convey fact. This disclaimer proves everything I type is satire and meant to entertain other people ONLY. Any data which appears to convey a fact or truth is 100% purely unintentional and should only be construed as a playful attempt to joke, provide satire, or entertain. I am not liable for any information that has been, in any way, connected to this computer, IP address, network or person. |
jj johns J to the 3rd User ID: 77401508 Switzerland 05/06/2019 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | human error had nothing to do with the boeing max carshes. Quoting: jj johns they made a decision to try to save money by using engines that didn't fit on the planes. this change to the normal aerodynamics of the plane allowed them to get around FAA regulations that would have normally needed them to re do certification on those planes. this would have cost the airlines a lot of money and time, and boeing's workaround avoided this, to the detriment of the flying public. there was a good article about this a month or so ago. i think it was in the publication named after the large ocean on the border with the east coast of the usa. (banned here sometimes). i believe i recall that article as well. Intentional design change to avoid certain legal fees with the planes that lowered their level of safety they kept with the original plane design to prevent having to have all pilots that fly the plane needing a new certification, even though the aerodynamics of the plane changed with the new location of the engines. if each airline needed to certify all their pilots on a "new" plane, it would have been very costly, and they may have instead bought the competitors (airbus') plane. i have a feeling boeing really hurt itself on this. which isn't good--i think having competition in the airline building industry is generally a good thing. you would think, boeing would have been more worried about safety than profits though, since decreased safety would greatly weigh upon long term profits. Last Edited by Jay3 on 05/06/2019 09:56 AM . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76819929 Mexico 05/06/2019 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76819929 Mexico 05/06/2019 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AltSwede User ID: 77584388 Sweden 05/06/2019 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AltSwede User ID: 77584388 Sweden 05/06/2019 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AltSwede User ID: 77584388 Sweden 05/06/2019 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
I hate you User ID: 77619205 United States 05/06/2019 10:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like they're still going to have made money off of the 737 fiasco, as they will now replace thousands of workers (starting with 900 right now) with computers and automated processes that does not require Human input. Quoting: Yew [link to www.yahoo.com (secure)] Nothing like fixing your mistake by destroying the livelihoods of those who helped your business prosper, eh? It was outsourced labor to begin with. God like productions or God like politics. Hard to tell these days.. |
Yew (OP) User ID: 75758325 United States 05/06/2019 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like they're still going to have made money off of the 737 fiasco, as they will now replace thousands of workers (starting with 900 right now) with computers and automated processes that does not require Human input. Quoting: Yew [link to www.yahoo.com (secure)] Nothing like fixing your mistake by destroying the livelihoods of those who helped your business prosper, eh? It was outsourced labor to begin with. lol so they are firing their own employees due to difficulties seen with contractors? [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Satire is one of the few forms of protected speech we can use to, well, speak. Everything i say is satire and intended for entertainment purposes only. Not a single communication to, from, associated with, or connected to this IP address in any fashion whatsoever, at any point in time (past, present and future), is intended to convey fact. This disclaimer proves everything I type is satire and meant to entertain other people ONLY. Any data which appears to convey a fact or truth is 100% purely unintentional and should only be construed as a playful attempt to joke, provide satire, or entertain. I am not liable for any information that has been, in any way, connected to this computer, IP address, network or person. |
Yew (OP) User ID: 75758325 United States 05/06/2019 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They could not get over the fact that the white male made the airplanes great, and immigrants can't. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76819929 To avoid putting white males back to work, which the "elite" HATE, robots it is. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Satire is one of the few forms of protected speech we can use to, well, speak. Everything i say is satire and intended for entertainment purposes only. Not a single communication to, from, associated with, or connected to this IP address in any fashion whatsoever, at any point in time (past, present and future), is intended to convey fact. This disclaimer proves everything I type is satire and meant to entertain other people ONLY. Any data which appears to convey a fact or truth is 100% purely unintentional and should only be construed as a playful attempt to joke, provide satire, or entertain. I am not liable for any information that has been, in any way, connected to this computer, IP address, network or person. |
Yew (OP) User ID: 75758325 United States 05/06/2019 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We'll see this same thread pinned in 2 weeks. today is not a boeing news kinda day :P [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Satire is one of the few forms of protected speech we can use to, well, speak. Everything i say is satire and intended for entertainment purposes only. Not a single communication to, from, associated with, or connected to this IP address in any fashion whatsoever, at any point in time (past, present and future), is intended to convey fact. This disclaimer proves everything I type is satire and meant to entertain other people ONLY. Any data which appears to convey a fact or truth is 100% purely unintentional and should only be construed as a playful attempt to joke, provide satire, or entertain. I am not liable for any information that has been, in any way, connected to this computer, IP address, network or person. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21582798 Canada 05/06/2019 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The NWO, BQMTJ, Degenerates are in the process of Disemboweling, and stripping equity from the once-great Boeing Airplane Co. Patriotic Americans, and Union Workers are standing-in-their-way...? [link to static.afbeeldinguploaden.nl (secure)] ? |