The Royal Baby is a Plastic Baby?

LMFAO!!!!!!! Yeah, I don't doubt it! That's why they covered up the ears!

It makes me wonder why someone would want something like that, I think they're really creepy.

That is really weird and I have to say.....I do suspect that baby is older than a newborn but in fairness to Ginger he might mean that the kid will change so much in the next 2 weeks and that will tell. My guess is that the little guy won't look like either of them.

Did anybody get a pic of Big Mike floating down the Thames drinking Champagne?

it was here I saw it.. kind of wished I hadn't

That's probably it. It is sometimes hard to tell what some British royals say because of their thick accent.

In the original clip Megan said the baby was very 'calm' and a dream.

I'm sure it would be smooth sailing with a plastic baby - lol.

Good one. Wait till they exchange the prop for a real live baby. Meghan will get the shock of her sleepless life.

Look at her palm. Her life line is cut very short by her FATE line.. OH DEAR

She may well follow in Di's footsteps after all..

Why is babby not moving?

I'm convinced!




.

Divorced B- actress Meghan Markle choice word's explains it all.

The prince absolutely did say the baby has changed over the last two weeks and Meghan has the oddest walk. I was assigning it to pain killers mixed with high heels. But why would they want to say she just had the baby if it was weeks ago? I was thinking maybe they were awaiting dna tests!!! Whoops!!!

MM is 37 years old...

and no complications of pregnancy or birth???

I re-watched the introduction of Baby Sussex.

MM specifically responds to reporter's inquiry by replying:

"IT'S... MAGIC.

IT'S PRETTY AMAZING... I HAVE THE TWO BEST GUYS IN THE WORLD, SO I'M REALLY HAPPY..."

Those are not the words of the mother.

Worse than B- grade acting.

Brit TV commentator stated that MM was so nervous but glowing...

I have not heard that George's nickname is Archie. I am guessing that is just a rumor but if true it is not very nice to take the cousin's nickname. It is certainly a strange thing to do. There is a lot of talk that such trouble making is in Markle's nature. She tries to upstage people all the time apparently. I know that there were whispers about Princess Eugenie not being to pleased with Markle's attempts at taking the spotlight away from Eugenie's wedding with the announcement of Markle's pregnancy at the same time.

Again, I have the suspicion that this is all talk meant to sell newspapers but Princess Diana was accused of similar things all the time. Prince Charles became angry a number times because he thought Princess Diana was trying to take away the spotlight from him on important occasions. It made Prince Charles look like a real jerk on a number of occasions. One time she wanted to visit a friend who was dying of AIDS. She was told he had very little time left and so she tried to visit him at his bedside in the most quiet way she could. Prince Charles became enraged because he had some sort of charity function in the same general area and he believed that by going to visit her dying friend she was taking away the media resources that should be following him. No joke. He became extremely angry and threatened her over a visit to her dying friend. He told her not to go under any circumstances and he was truly threatening to her. I believe they were already divorced or in the process at the time.

It is not as if Diana did not attempt to upstage Charles. She did it all the time but his anger and nastiness to her was totally inappropriate. She was accused of all sorts of nonsense anytime she outshone him. Again she could have been smarter about her appearances and a bit more empathetic to her husband's work but she seems to have been attacked over any little thing she did. Sometimes Diana was taken aback by some of the accusation. She was accused of using charity events to undermine her husband and all sorts of nonsense. SO I am a bit skeptical of the more sensational accusations against Markle. On the other hand you have William and Kate who manage to avoid such nonsense easily.

SO is there a genuine attempt by Markle to steal the spotlight and upstage her royal in laws or is this a bunch nonsense to sell papers? It is difficult to say. There is some evidence that she may have an agenda but that was going around about Kate as well and she has turned out to be a fairly respectful public figure.

This is what I am talking about. There is an undercurrent of an agenda with Markle. The female version of Barack Obama. The thing is that if Markle is some sort of a plant meant to make the Royal family more "diverse" and maybe worse then how stupid is Prince Harry to marry her. How disturbing is it when a white guy is in to black people like that. He just comes off as a pathetic looking person. It is also very homosexual as her birth date and mixed race heritage is what he was interested in. It just seems completely shallow and creepy. He is in love with Barack Obama or the idea of him. People in love with an idea and willing to live their life around an agenda and spend their time weaving a narrative as such are disturbed individuals or completely stupid.

It is truly difficult to see and downright sad to watch white people try to act like they are friends with black people. You could see Prince Harry being excited over being with the black cast of Hamilton. He was just a little to nervous and happy. Like he is saying look at me! I am super cool and all about black people. It is disingenuous and comes through in an obvious manner. There is an English earl who is married to a black woman and every time they take a picture together he raises his head gives a very serious frown and looks down his nose at the camera. He has a black wife who he uses as a tool to prove he is not racist. His body language makes his motives obvious. It is simply painful to watch. White people who do this are mentally disturbed. To live your life as narrative to prove your better than everyone because you are married to a black woman and down with black people shows how the person is weak-minded and easily led astray by propaganda and brainwashing. It also opens to the door for blacks to use such people.

This intense propaganda and brainwashing has been going on for sometime in the United States. Most people are smart enough to rise above it and they would certainly never ruin their private lives in order to look progressive and cool. The other benefit is that in the U.S. most white people see how destructive and low IQ black culture truly is. The media constantly promotes black entertainment and culture as the standard and the advertising agencies rally push interracial coupling as the only acceptable way to portray people but in the United States the truth about how degenerate, stupid and cruel black culture truly is is put on display daily.

White people who have sexual relationships with blacks are seen as desperate, below average in every way and mentally damaged. Again, to fall victim to propaganda shows in a person. Look at the intense way the media pushes the Kardashians on the young women as what is cool and the awesome. If you are that stupid to take sexual realtions with a black because that Kardashians do it then you deserve the heartache. Blacks treat their spouses like dirt and you are not going to live like the Kardashians. It is difficult to see how the younger sister changed everything about the way she looked and lived her life. It is like the lyrics of Pink's song Don't let me get me, LA told me, "You'll be a pop star. All you have to change is everything you are." That is the message. Don't change who you are to fit a narrative. Especially one where you open yourself up to being used and abused Young white men and women are bombarded with the propaganda that you have to be a certain way and when they do what Hollywood tells them they become victims.

Wasn't Mountbatten blown up by the IRA for being a nonce or associating with elite paedo circles. Hey Charlie boy, what did you do with that dossier you were given, go on the fire did it?

Ef deez Royals. Mean nothing to me no more. *thumbdown*

Not unless all the babies I have seen are plastic...

I collect palm prints, like Hitlary and her 2doubles, it's how I can easily tell them apart(plus Hitlery had bad teeth). I was really taken aback at Megans palm. It's a mess, Love line is tied to ambition, life-line shows a couple of near misses, looks like accidents like auto or plane, which corresponds to baby's possible birth chart showing a none-mom.(moon in zero degree of Gemini=two mothers(surrogate? or step?) and mother not around in a nurturing way).
These reborns or silicons are incredible and alot of women who cant have babies find solace in them. Also women whose child(ren) may have died. If I were meg, I would think this would be a good cover to take "baby" out in public and not worry about accidents. That would explain hiding the hair which the artists couldnt reproduce on short notice at all, and the ears,same reason. The Bob Hope nose is like both mom and dad, easy guess and of course it would be lite skinned being only 1/8th or less, and probably has "good" hair, if a little wavy. Her hair and eye color are dominent gene, but her dad had light eyes and maybe if that recessive matches both recessives Harry has baby itchy could have blue eyes.

Archie Debunked.

OP, where you got the name Harrison from?
Does not say so in the links.

Ever so this. It isn't moving or breathing. If you watch a newborn they are constantly in motion even when asleep. Lips, nose, stretching, sleep jerking, startling when touched or moved around, opening eyes briefly then closing for no reason, sighing. They didn't show it very much because, it's too big to be 2 days old and too filled out and rounded. Newborns also, have shrunken and bent legs for about 3 weeks before they straighten out of birth posture/fetal position.

It appears to be a silicone baby. She always wore silicone bump usually the wrong size for the purported month because she jacked them up too soon. Wearing a six month moonbump a month after she announced, then working up to a nine month when she would have been only 5-6 supposedly. Then upon realizing there is no 10 or 11 month sizes and she still had two months before the public, she wore a different size according to her clothing since she never wore maternity wear and never went to a pre-natal ob/gyn visit.

Harry was in on it so, I presume he is the one who is sterile and she just didn't want to be pregnant for wine and other purposes so a surrogate it is. Just my take.

Anger with the parents.

This is what fueled the political subculture of the sixties.

They went to private schools and their parents had colored maids and their revolution was to champion the maid.

They became marxists but kept all the affiliation with their privileged lives.

Most white people do not live like this and think that those
who do are crazy and it is the working class that pays the price by having their neighborhoods turned into sh1tholes because the rich kids are pissed at mummy and daddy.

I think the Krawdadshians were promised wealth and fame for pushing the black/white bf and husband thing. They needed style bloggers and tv lifestyle people to promote the agenda. They were given fake followers so they seemed popular and had their numbers padded early on and then the lemmings took over to make it self-fulfilling.

As for Harry, you can't overlook his trying to tamp down the ginger. If he marries the blondes he dated and prefers there is a good chance he will have rad-faced, red-haired gingers. By mixing with black it will cancel that and mostly ensure that it will have darker hair, eyes and skin. He might be sterile or low sperm count needing lab help and/or just need family DNA to mix.

So was diana for charles who was more comfortable with the motherly type camilla. Those type of lavender marriages can work. Oedipus much? This is a reason not to send children to same-sex schools.

It's a great clip. Of course Harry flubbed it. He spoke the truth and not the lie. BUT, that's just how long they've had IT haha I'm sure he meant "him" the other day.
To say "it" in reference to your newborn child is strange, but no so a plastic realistic doll. They've had it to practice with for the past two weeks. She still wearing an outsized fake "bump".

I have no idea what their endame is, but there is an agenda since it involves secrecy, deceit, disinfo, and subterfuge. For a baby not even in line to the throne, really. A real child will be presented again sometime when the age will not be as noticeably "OFF".

This is so funny me and hubs were watching the vid and first thing I said was that's a fake baby. I could tell by not even looking at it and just her holding it. I said I bet it's one of those realistic baby dolls. Something didn't seem natural about it. I'm guessing they do that for photo ops or maybe their actually is no baby. Wasn't there something posted about her fake bump.
Who knows and who cares at this point. The whole world's a farce these days as far as I'm concerned.