DEC 31, 2019 UPDATE: This lawsuit could end all water fluoridation in the U.S.

I believe it

So you work for a water sanitation company?

It's about fookin time!!

Fluoride is great for preventing cavities why end this?

^^^I agree!^^^ I am fortunate to have a dentist for my child who is okay with opting out of the annual fluoride treatment. On a recent visit, I asked her whether she noticed any difference between her patients who receive this treatment, who drink tap water, and who use fluoridated toothpaste compared to those children who don't. She gave me her honest opinion, stating that she sees kids with multiple cavities and those with no cavities whether they use fluoride or not - there appears to be no difference. The main difference, she said, was how frequently they brush and floss using any dentrifice to remove leftover food from the gums and teeth. I appreciated her honesty, even though she still feels obligated to recommend the use of fluoride because the studies indicate it is beneficial (studies performed by the companies that make the fluoridated toothpastes, I should add.) Anyway, if fluoridation poses more harm than the supposed good that toothpaste manufacturers want people to believe, there is no reason to be ingesting the stuff into our cells.

[link to archive.nytimes.com (secure)]

I agree with your premise, but how can you be sure that you know what "proper sources" are, at this age and time?

Is water in PLASTIC bottles more safe for drinking? Do you know what time, sun rays, or heat, can do to plastics and any water exposed to plastics?

Or water filters. Do you believe that these are safe, especially if based on some "new unique technology" and "new unique materials"?

Perhaps they catch everything above 0.5 microns, but then you ingest much smaller particles (coming from the filter material itself) that are actually much more dangerous than larger particles.

I don't believe that even manufacturers really know, or are able to test properly.

This should have been done decades ago ... end is nigh

All true. Plus my country is cucked out big time, and flouridated to the hilt, so his point is entirely redundant.

one of the few good reasons to live in Portland Oregon. no fluoride in the water.

Right, because we all know on the back of toothpaste it says "swallow in large amounts, it's good for you!"

They are doing this all wrong. Teeth are not protected by drinking.

The correct way to protect teeth is by vaccines.

I hope this is a joke, AC...

Very interesting. There was a point when I started gravity-filtering my water that all my fillings started falling out. I was already doing organics, and not using chemicals in housekeeping and such.

While not good for my mouth, as this was happening, I was actively beginning to see just how diabolical the left truly was.

As registered Dem, I actually voted for Bernie in the primary...but, quickly started to awaken after my dentist needed to pull an abscessed tooth that had lost a filling.

Soon after, I made a 'miraculous recovery': jumping aboard the Trump Train.

I'm pretty certain there are people here who read my 'before and after posts' regarding how I initially reacted to Trump, then converted. While I slowly came to see through Obama over time (somehow convinced he had been co-opted by hidden hands), I totally detested Hillary and was actively pumped to defeat her chances.

Maybe that 'passion' is what started to waken me.

I've come to consider that a combination of my subconscious intellect, in line with my immune system, contributed to getting that mercury out of my system, no matter the cost it wrested upon my teeth. As implausible as it may sound, this universe does work in mysterious ways as it balances itself. It KNEW that Hillary winning, in alignment with a little-known deep state, would upset our balance. Thus...

...began the Great-Awakening.

It's uncanny how all those fillings began dropping out in a short period of time. Or, maybe it was simply a necessity in order to help save us all.

Ha! My mind's once again thinking in over-drive. Apologies, where needed.



Last Edited by esotericMorgan on 05/23/2019 12:36 PM

There goes my shares!

This^^^^

While this is absolutely true, we've yet to have the chance to try something different. Taking the 'politics' out of our system of government will be a necessity, and challenge.

There's a 'purge' going on across both aisles, that will hopefully put an end to that dichotomy of control of deep-state interests.

By the time we get there, there's a strong possibility that our electoral system - in conjunction with a more awakened populace - will enable us to begin vetting our choices more intensely. A ('revamping') of honest journalism will be a must.

Maybe that explains Stacey Abrams & her ilk.



.

Using a toothbrush moistened with food-grade H2O2!

FLUORIDE LAWSUIT FUNDRAISING UPDATE:

MAY 23, 2019

Dr. Bill Hirzy spent over thirty years as a risk assessment scientist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and as the Vice President of the EPA's Professionals' Union he championed their call for Congress to pass a moratorium on artificial water fluoridation in 2000 (also see EPA Union History on Fluoride).

...

Since Tuesday, we have raised $3,027 from 56 donors on our way to raising $100,000 by mid-July. With the current pledge to double donations included, this brings us to $6,054 total. Thank you to all who have invested in this precedent-setting lawsuit.

You can follow FAN's progress on our fundraiser webpage, as well as on social media by searching for the hashtag: #FluorideLawsuit.

...

Fluoride Awareness Week

FAN has teamed up with Dr. Joseph Mercola to bring you our 9th Annual Fluoride Awareness Week (May 19-26). Dr. Mercola has been featuring articles on his website and social media sites discussing the risks associated with fluoride and the need for ending artificial water fluoridation worldwide, and will continue to do so through Sunday.

Mercola kicked off Awareness week with a new article highlighting the lastest scientific, legal, and campaign updates:

Harmful Effects of Fluoride Continue to Mount

Share our Facebook post on the article
Share our Twitter post on the article

Thank you,

Stuart Cooper
Campaign Director
Fluoride Action Network

---

Article on Dr. Mercola's site:

Harmful Effects of Fluoride Continue to Mount
By Stuart Cooper, Campaign Director, Fluoride Action Network
May 21, 2019

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Research linking fluoridation with harmful long-term side effects continues to mount, with more undeniable evidence of fluoride’s neurotoxicity published as FAN’s historic trial with the EPA draws closer.

Fluoridation overfeed in Sandy, Utah, sickens hundreds of residents and is only one of over 50 reported fluoridation-related accidents since 2000.

Campaign momentum is building as FAN launches an effort to warn women to avoid fluoride exposure during pregnancy and releases additional educational materials to the public.

Ending the addition of hazardous fluoridation chemicals — primarily hydrofluorosilicic acid — to the public's drinking water will be one of the greatest public health achievements of the 21st century.

With each passing month, the case against artificial fluoridation builds as new research showing harm is published, legal action advances, overfeeds and spills are exposed and local fluoride-free campaigns spread throughout the world.

Mounting Evidence of Harm
A number of significant studies — two of which were funded by the U.S. government (the National Institutes of Health, or NIH) — have been published in the last eight months linking fluoride exposure to lowered IQ, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and thyroid problems, and showing that pregnant women and infants in "optimally" fluoridated communities are exposed to significantly more fluoride than those in non-fluoridated communities.

In February 2019, a string of news stories — triggered by a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report1 admitting that at least 40% of children are overexposed to fluoride — focused on kids swallowing too much toothpaste and neglected the significant exposure from fluoridated tap water.

Regardless, the defenders of water fluoridation are missing the real story. Dental fluorosis is a biomarker of overexposure to fluoride and the "elephant in the room" is what damage fluoride is doing to other tissues.

Recent scientific research indicates that exposure to fluoridated water may lower thyroid function particularly in those with an iodine deficiency. A new study also found that significantly more infants, particularly those under 6 months of age, will exceed the upper limit set by the Institute of Medicine for fluoride when consuming formula reconstituted with the "optimal" 0.7 parts per million (ppm), greatly increasing their risk of side effects.

There are now over 350 published studies on fluoride's effect on the brain: 130 human studies, over 200 animal studies and 33 cell studies. This includes a major U.S.-government funded mother-offspring study conducted in Mexico City. This rigorous study — which controlled for many possible confounders — found a very strong association between fluoride levels in mothers' urine and lowered IQ for their offspring.

The fluoride levels in this study also correspond to levels in pregnant women living in "optimally" fluoridated areas in Canada according to an October 2018 paper.

The same research team at University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health has since released additional findings that confirm and strengthen their 2017 fetus/IQ study. Very young children, aged 1 to 3 years, also show loss of IQ. In other words, their study now covers the ages of the offspring from 1 to 12 years.

For the ages of 1 to 3 years, for every 1 mg/L increase in the urine fluoride level of their pregnant mothers, the children averaged 2.4-point lower IQ scores. The finding was statistically significant and accounted for potential confounding factors.

They concluded, "Our findings add to our team's recently published report on prenatal fluoride and cognition at ages 4 and 6–12 years by suggesting that higher in utero exposure to F has an adverse impact on offspring cognitive development that can be detected earlier, in the first three years of life."

This was followed up by another published paper that linked higher levels of urinary fluoride during pregnancy with more symptoms of ADHD — the second study to do so.

World Expert on Lead Now Warns of Fluoride's Neurotoxicity
As if the recent research condemning fluoridation couldn't get any worse, a major review article in the journal Pediatric Medicine by David Bellinger, Ph.D., professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, has included fluoride in a list of chemicals known or suspected to interfere with the neurodevelopment of children.

Bellinger, recognized as one the leading experts in the world on the neurotoxicity of lead, holds three important positions in Boston: two at Harvard and one at Boston Children's Hospital.

In his review of fluoride's neurotoxicity, Bellinger cites the meta-analysis of 27 IQ studies from China and Iran; a follow-up study in China he co-wrote and the more recent U.S. government-funded mother-offspring studies from Mexico City.

While the mainstream media covered the Choi meta-analysis from 2012, they have ignored all the major neurotoxicity studies published since then. Meanwhile, they continue to go overboard on low-quality studies that focus on tooth decay.

According to Paul Connett, Ph.D., Fluoride Action Network (FAN) director, "We hope that when more pediatricians read about these important neurotoxicity studies — especially the mother-offspring studies — that they will warn women of child-bearing age to avoid all sources of fluoride during pregnancy and parents not to bottle-feed their infants with formula prepared with fluoridated tap water."

Help FAN's Precedent-Setting Neurotoxicity Lawsuit
These new scientific findings further strengthen the evidence of fluoride's neurotoxicity. The fluoride levels at issue in these studies are within the range that pregnant women in the U.S. are receiving, so the findings are clearly relevant to our ongoing legal case against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

In November 2016, the FAN together with a coalition of organizations and private citizens, presented a petition to the EPA calling on the agency to exercise its authority to prohibit the addition of fluoridation chemicals to the public's drinking water supplies under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

The EPA dismissed our petition, which prompted our coalition to file a lawsuit in U.S. District Court. Since then, we've had several significant legal victories. First, Judge Edward Chen denied the EPA's motion to dismiss the case. Second, the judge denied a request by the EPA to prohibit our attorneys from obtaining internal documents and our experts from using the recently published studies mentioned above.

The third victory came in October 2018 when the EPA objected to sharing internal documents — or allowing their employees to be deposed — about their acknowledgment of and concerns about the known risks associated with fluoridation. Judge Chen ruled the EPA had to share this crucial information (see the Judge's full ruling).

Yet another victory came in April 2019 when the court compelled EPA to both produce further documents and produce three more of its scientists for deposition.

Read more: [link to articles.mercola.com (secure)]

Idiocracy

Trial against EPA set for two weeks in April.

Get ready.

Will aim to update this thread again when the trial begins or if there are any notable updates before then.

Jewish waters

pin requested

CHINESE FACTORY WASTE

What is the latest on this. Seems it all disappeared when Convid hit.