|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Moon Landing - 50 Year Anniversary - Images Of ...? - What Did Those Astronauts See...?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
LHP598 |
|
Post Content
|
...
It is more than enough. The only issue is with you.
Quoting: LHP598 While I disagree, I don't feel the need to cloud the discussion with pointless personal attacks. Something a little more substantive than that would put the issue to rest, and not make one question motivations. nome sane? Stating the fact that a move to the side and slight rotation is more than enough to hide the rock is not a personal attack. the rocks on the left side moved to the side enough for the rock on the right to be hidden. the faint red line at the top was to the right of the rock in question before and now, though it points to the same crater in the distance, it is now right next to the large rock. You can also see that the large rock is slightly rotated. All of that together makes it a fact that it is more than enough for the rock in question to be hidden by the larger rock. It also appears to be a fact that YOU have trouble visualizing in three dimensions. Actually what I had in mind was that you would post a graphic with perspective lines drawn in to prove your point. I suspect you have already done this, and to your dismay realized the perspective does not change enough to hide the rock. Have not done it because the already provided pics with the red lines shows enough. It is enough to hide the rock whether you believe it or not. Still not a problem. But since YOU think such a diagram would help why don't YOU do it.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
