Woman's church ceremony doesn't upset alimony, court says

A pastor at First Congregational Church of Traverse City performed a Christian marriage ceremony for Lueck and her partner, Matthew Bassett. They exchanged vows and rings — but didn't seek a marriage license.

This is weird on several different levels

It's called a common law marriage it counts. She should be forced to pay back her alimony since she remarried.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 06/11/2019 09:02 PM

Yea that’s messed up, what retard state was that in?

Tardigan....err Michigan

What's weird about it?

The cunt wanted to continue getting pain by her now red-pilled ex hubby to the tune of $120k/per year.

An orchestrated and manipulative move by the bitch.

Pastors like that, are why Christ utterly condemned clergy.

Michigan will be one of the first states the Patriots lose followed by New York, Maryland, and Pennsylvania in the new world war.

Yea

Wew, makes me scared of marriage.

The ex husband should just refuse to pay the Alimony and tell the judicial system to go fuck itself.

If my wife goes psycho all of a sudden and tries to force me to pay for alimony, I will go to jail before I pay a single dime.

Thats some tithe fodder right there.

I would marry her for a one time payment of S1200, those guys are going to expect it every year.

That is really mean there.

Why? Were they homos?

1) Christ hated Clerics(Read Matthew 7, is a sermon against clerics).

2) The Pastor deliberately is aiding in the fraud.

3) The Pastor is aiding adultery, as remarriage after divorce is adultery in Christianity.

It is a continuation of Anarcho-tyranny.

Michigan does not recognize them for people co-habiting in state. But yes, the original judge was correct in saying this bitch is worthless, evil, manipulative piece of shit who should be raped to death by a pack of crazed PCP and crack-addled homeless bums crusty in their own piss and shit.

Then they say the MGTOVVS are wrong.

They, common law marriages, were ruled unconstitutional by the SCOTUS so there are some grounds the groom has to fight it at a higher court if he has a smart lawyer.

Yeah but it's a guy who's paying. So, screw him.

SCOTUS has no say in marriage. Separation of church and state.

I don't understand why ANY man would be insane enough to ever get married under the current legal system, thanks feminists! You trashed it for a lot of girls dreams, and hopes of getting a husband!

Russian Roulette: 17% chance of losing everything!

Marriage in a western country: 50 to 65% chance of losing everything!

Marriage is from God and divorce/conflicts/etc were handled within the Church. But stupid Catholics integrated fake-church and government and put marriage under the govt jurisdiction, the vestigal of which exists today along with all its problems.

All marriages should be common law. Govt "license" marriages is just another govt overreach such as guns licensing/registration and such nonsense.

Last Edited by Weyoun on 06/11/2019 11:33 PM

well......they are not actually married in any state in the US.

so they get no perk to being LEGALLY married.

new husband get nothing if they split.

bet when the 10 years is over if she is still with him they get it done LEGALLY.

that was a FU to the first husband.

That is the point, rapid population reduction because people refuse to marry.

This leads to dysgenic's, as smart people refuse to breed due to the liability of it, producing a dumber underclass.

Marriage is disgusting

I shit you not, the Pastor is named "Chad".

[link to www.fcctc.org]

Life is going to be soooo much fun for some people after the economic crash.

I wonder if the church is aware of that. Quite immoral of her.